Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 203–254 | Cite as

Aspects of english aspect: On the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases

  • Anita Mittwoch


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Durational Phrase English Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abusch, Dorit: 1985,On Verbs and Time, University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, Emmon: 1980, ‘Tenses and Aspects as Functions on Verb-Phrases’, in C. Rohrer (ed.),Time Tense and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, Emmon: 1981, ‘On Time, Tense and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in P. Cole (ed.),Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, Gero: 1970, ‘The English ‘Perfect’ Re-considered’,Journal of Linguistics 6, 189–198.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, David C.: 1975,Spatial and Temporal Uses of English Prepositions: An Essay in Stratificational Semantics, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, Michael: 1981, ‘Of Tense and Aspect: One Analysis’, in P. J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 14: Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, Michael and Barbara H. Partee: 1972, ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’, Systems Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, Gregory: 1980,Reference to Kinds in English, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Comrie, Bernard: 1976,Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Declerck, Renaat: 1979, ‘Aspect and the Bounded/Unbounded (Telic/Atelic) Distinction’,Linguistics 17, 761–794.Google Scholar
  11. Dowty, David: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Emonds, Joseph E.: 1976, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Gabbay, Dov and Julius Moravcsik: 1980, ‘Verbs, Events and the Flow of Time’, in C. Rohrer (ed.),Time, Tense and Quantifiers, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
  14. Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Ivan A. Sag: 1982, ‘Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar’,Language 58, 591–638.Google Scholar
  15. Goldsmith, John and Erich Woisetschlaeger: 1982, ‘The Logic of the English Progressive’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 79–89.Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, William W.: 1889,Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  17. Hatcher, Anna G.: 1951, ‘The Use of the Progressive Form in English’,Language 27, 254–280.Google Scholar
  18. Heny, Frank: 1982, ‘Tense, Aspect and Time Adverbials, Part II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 109–154.Google Scholar
  19. Jackendoff, Ray: 1978, ‘Grammar and Evidence for Conceptual Structure’, in M. Halle, J. Bresnan and G. A. Miller (eds.),Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
  20. Jespersen, Otto: 1931,A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part IV, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  21. Inoue, Kyoko: 1978, ‘How Many Senses Does the English Perfect Have?’,Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 167–178.Google Scholar
  22. Kamp, Hans and Christian Rohrer: 1983, ‘Tense in Texts’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 250–269.Google Scholar
  23. Kenny, Anthony: 1963,Action, Emotion and Will, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  24. König, Ekkehard: 1980, ‘On the Context-Dependence of the Progressive in English’, in C. Rohrer (ed.),Time, Tense and Quantifiers, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 269–292.Google Scholar
  25. Ladusaw, William A.: 1980,Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  26. Leech, Geoffrey N.: 1969,Towards a Semantic Description of English, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  27. Leech, Geoffrey N.: 1971,Meaning and the English Verb, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  28. Lyons, John: 1977,Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. McCawley, James D.: 1971, ‘Tense and Time Reference in English’, in C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (eds.),Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
  30. McCawley, James D.: 1981a,Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic but were Ashamed to Ask, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. McCawley, James D.: 1981b, ‘Notes on the English Present Perfect’,Australian Journal of Linguistics 1, 81–90.Google Scholar
  32. McCoard, Robert W.: 1978,The English Perfect: Tense-Choice and Pragmatic Inferences, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Meulen, Alice ter, 1983, ‘The Representation of Time in Natural Language’, in Alice G. B. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp, 177–191.Google Scholar
  34. Mittwoch, Anita: 1977, ‘Negative Sentences with Until’,Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 410–417.Google Scholar
  35. Mittwoch, Anita: 1982, ‘On the Difference between Eating and Eating Something’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 113–121.Google Scholar
  36. Mourelatos, Alexander, P. D.: 1978, ‘Events, Processes, and States’,Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–434. Reprinted in Philip Tedeschi and Annie Zaenen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 14:Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York, pp. 191–212.Google Scholar
  37. Palmer, Frank R.: 1974, The English Verb, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  38. Partee, Barbara H.: 1984, ‘Compositionality’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  39. Prior, Arthur: 1967,Past, Present and Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. Richards, Barry: 1982, ‘Tense, Aspect and Time Adverbials, Part I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 59–107.Google Scholar
  41. Taglicht, Joseph: 1983,Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English Longman, London.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, Barry: 1977, ‘Tense and Continuity’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.Google Scholar
  43. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Waterhouse, John: 1967, ‘‘Already’ and ‘Yet’: A Suppletive Set of Aspect-Markers?’,Journal of Linguistics 5, 287–304.Google Scholar
  44. Vendler, Zeno: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Vlach, Frank: 1981, ‘The Semantics of the Progressive’, in P. J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 14:Tense and Aspect, Academic Press, New York, pp. 271–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Mittwoch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations