Summary
Differential kidney function is usually studied by quantification of relative renal uptake at 2–4 h after injection of the radiopharmaceutical99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). The outcome of this measurement, however, may be unreliable in cases of obstructive uropathy. The obstructed kidney may retain the radiopharmaceutical in the dilated system, which may lead to relatively high values for functioning cortical mass. In this situation, determination of the split kidney function at 24 h instead of 4 h after application of99mTc-DMSA has been advocated. In order to compare results at 4 h and 24 h an investigation was performed in 8 patients with obstructive renal disease present for more than 2 weeks, and in 7 patients who did not suffer from obstruction. In these 15 patients the differential function measured at 4 h and at 24 h was the same. From our results we conclude that overestimation of the function of an obstructed kidney by99mTc-DMSA scanning at 4 h is not a major problem. According to the literature, however, in cases of acute obstruction or “complicated” obstruction with stones or infection,99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy can underestimate the potential function of the obstructed kidney.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Taylor A (1982) Quantitation of renal function with static imaging agents. Sem in Nucl Med 12:330–344
Enlander D, Weber PM, dos Remedios LV (1974) Renal cortical imaging in 35 patients: superior quality with DMSA. J Nucl Med 15:743–748
Kawamura J, Hosokawa S, Fujita T (1978) Validity of DMSA renal uptake for an assessment of individual kidney function. J Urol 119:305–309
Chibber PJ, Chisholm GD, Hargreave TB, Merrick MV (1981) DMSA and the prediction of recovery in obstructive uropathy. Br J Urol 53:492–495
De Maeyer P, Simons M, Oosterlinck W, de Sy WA (1982) A clinical study of DMSA uptake in obstructed kidneys: comparison with the creatinine clearance. J Urol 128:8–9
Beekhuis H, Piers DA (1983) Quantification of Tc-99m-DMSA uptake in the kidney. Eur J Nucl Med 8:A3
Parker RM, Rudd TG, Wonderly RK, Ansell JS (1981) UPJ obstruction in infants and children: functional evaluation of the obstructed kidney preoperatively and postoperatively. J Urol 126:509–512
Creutzig H, Schindler E, Reuter ThD, Fröhlich D (1979) Abschätzung der seitengetrennten Nierenfunktion bei Harnabflußstörungen. Urologe 18:316–320
Scott McDougal W, Flanigan RC (1981) Renal functional recovery of the hydronephrotic kidney predicted before relief of the obstruction. Invest Urol 18:440–442
Moser E, Jocham D, Beer M, Büll U. (1980) Effects of obstruction on single-kidney function. Nucl Med 19:257–262
Creutzig H, Schindler E (1984) Szintigraphie bei chronischen Harnabflußstörungen. Urologe 23:50–54
v. Poppel H, Vereecken R, Vekemans K (1985) Clinical evaluation of DMSA renogram. Urology 25:413–417
Holten I, Storm HH (1979) Kidney scintigraphy with DMSA and hippurate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 13:275–281
Bingham JB, Maisey MN (1978) An evaluation of the use of DMSA as a static renal imaging agent. Br J Radiol 51:599–607
Abbou CC, Moretti JL, Chopin D (1981) Separate renal function evaluation by DMSA. In: Schulman CC (ed) Advances in diagnostic urology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–233
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lycklama à Nijeholt, G.A.B., Pauwels, E.K.J., Arndt, J.W. et al. The reliability of Tc-99m-DMSA scintigraphy in obstructive uropathy: is late scanning at 24 hours necessary?. World J Urol 3, 253–255 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632188
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632188