Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 711–739 | Cite as

Representingde re beliefs

  • Thomas J. McKay


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, in Jody Kreiman and Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.),Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, Kent: 1987,Thought and Reference, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Boër, Steven and William Lycan: 1980, ‘Who, Me?’,Philosophical Review 89, 427–466.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, Gareth: 1985,Collected Papers, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362, reprinted in Evans: 1985, pp. 214–248.Google Scholar
  6. May, Robert: 1988, ‘Bound Variable Anaphora’, in Ruth M. Kempson (ed.)Mental Representations, Cambridge, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
  7. McKay, Thomas: 1988, ‘De Re andDe Se Belief’, in David Austin (ed.),Philosophical Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 207–217.Google Scholar
  8. McKay, Thomas: 1991a, ‘he himself: Undiscovering an Anaphor’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 368–373.Google Scholar
  9. McKay, Thomas: 19916, ‘Unbound Pronouns’, manuscript.Google Scholar
  10. Reinhart, Tanya: 1983,Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  11. Reinhart, Tanya: 1986, ‘Center and Periphery in the Grammar of Anaphora’, inStudies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 123–150.Google Scholar
  12. Richard, Mark: 1983, ‘Direct Reference and Ascription of Belief’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 425–452, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar
  13. Richard, Mark: 1990, Propositional Attitudes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  14. Salmon, Nathan: 1986, ‘Reflexivity’, inNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 401–429, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 240–274.Google Scholar
  15. Salmon, Nathan: 1991, ‘Reflections on Reflexivity’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.15 (February 1992).Google Scholar
  16. Salmon, Nathan and Scott Soames: 1988,Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Soames, Scott: 1987a, ‘Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’,Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 197–239.Google Scholar
  18. Soames, Scott: 1987b, ‘Substitutivity’, in J. J. Thomson (ed.)On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Soames, Scott: 1990, ‘Pronouns and Propositional Attitudes’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.Google Scholar
  20. Soames, Scott: 1991, “Attitudes and Anaphors,” manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. McKay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations