Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 367–397 | Cite as

Definite descriptions and definite generics

  • Almerindo E. Ojeda
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Definite Generic Definite Description 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, Emmon: 1989,Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Michael: 1974,Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Benzie, David and Andrew Philipson: 1957,The Alimentary Tract of the Ruminant, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  4. Bochvar, Dmitri: 1937, ‘On a Three-Valued Logical Calculus and its Application to the Analysis of the Paradoxes of the Classical Extended Functional Calculus [Translation]’,History and Philosophy of Logic 2, 87–112, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Bunt, Harry: 1985,Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Carlson, Gregory: 1978,Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington. Published by the Garland seriesOutstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. Edited by George Hankamer. New York, Garland Publishing Company, 1982, which we cite.Google Scholar
  7. Carnap, Rudolf: 1947,Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Cartwright, Helen: 1965, ‘Heraclitus and the Bath Water’,Philosophical Review 74, 466–85.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, Robin: 1983,Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Cruse, D.: 1986,Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, Östen: 1975, ‘On Generics’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Dahl, Östen: 1988, ‘Inherited Genericity’, in Krifka,Genericity in Natural Language, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  13. Dowty, David et al.: 1981,Introduction to Montague Semantics [=Synthese Language Library 11], Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Geach, Peter: 1950, ‘Russell's Theory of Descriptions’,Analysis 10, 84–88.Google Scholar
  15. Geurts, Bart: 1988, ‘The Representation of Generic Knowledge’, in Krifka,Genericity in Natural Language, pp. 155–174.Google Scholar
  16. Heim, Irene: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published by the Garland seriesOutstanding Dissertations in Linguistics, edited by George Hankamer, Garland Publishing Company, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Heny, Frank: 1972, ‘Review ofMeaning and the Structure of Language by Wallace Chafe’,College English 33, 908–929.Google Scholar
  18. Heyer, Gerhard: 1985, ‘Generic Descriptions, Default Reasoning, and Typicality’,Theoretical Linguistics 12, 33–72.Google Scholar
  19. Heyer, Gerhard: 1988, ‘A Frame-Based Approach to Generic Descriptions’, in Krifka,Genericity in Natural Language, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar
  20. Jespersen, Otto: 1924,The Philosophy of Grammar, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  21. Jespersen, Otto: 1954,A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson-Laird, Philip: 1983,Mental Models, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in Jeroen Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322. Reprinted in Jeroen Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  24. Karttunen, Lauri: 1976, ‘Discourse Referents’, in James McCawley (ed.),Notes from the Linguistic Underground [=Syntax and Semantics 7], Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Kleene, Stephen: 1952,Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Krifka, Manfred: 1987,Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity [=FNS-Bericht 17], Forschungsstelle für natürlich-sprachliche Systeme, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  27. Krifka, Manfred: 1988,Genericity in Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1988 Tübingen Conference, Seminar für natürlich-sprachliche Systeme der Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  28. Lakoff, George: 1972, ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic’, in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language [=Synthese Library 40], Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups I, II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605, 723–744.Google Scholar
  30. Lasersohn, Peter: 1989, ‘On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 130–134.Google Scholar
  31. Leonard, Henry and Nelson Goodman: 1940, ‘The Calculus of Individuals and its Uses’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.Google Scholar
  32. Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in Rainer Bäuerle et al. (eds.),Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Link, Godehard: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in Peter Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers [=Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 31], Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Link, Godehard: 1988, ‘Dependency in the Theory of Generics’, in Krifka pp. 313–335.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, Samuel: 1975,A Reference Grammar of Japanese, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, John: 1987,Elements of Formal Semantics, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  37. Massey, Gerald: 1976, ‘Tom, Dick, and Harry, and all the King's Men’,American Philosophical Quarterly 13, 89–107.Google Scholar
  38. Mayr, Ernst: 1988, ‘The Ontology of the Species Taxon’, inToward a New Philosophy of Biology. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp. 335–363.Google Scholar
  39. McCawley, James: 1981,Everything Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Parsons, Terry: 1970, ‘An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms’,Foundations of Language 6, 362–388. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979, pp. 137–166).Google Scholar
  41. Pelletier, Francis: 1979,Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  42. Quine, Willard Van Orman: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  43. Russell, Bertrand: 1905, ‘On Denoting’,Mind 14, 479–493.Google Scholar
  44. Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective, and Cumulative Quantification’, in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stockhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language 2 [=Mathematical Centre Tracts 136], Institute Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. Schaller, George and Selsam, Millicent: 1969,The Tiger, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Sharvy, Richard: 1980, ‘A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions’,The Philosophical Review 89, 607–624.Google Scholar
  47. Simons, Peter: 1983, ‘Class, Mass, and Mereology’,History and Philosophy of Logic 4, 157–180.Google Scholar
  48. Simons, Peter: 1987,Parts. A Study in Ontology, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Strawson, Peter: 1950, ‘On Referring’Mind 59, 320–344.Google Scholar
  50. Tarski, Alfred: 1956a, ‘On the Foundations of Boolean Algebra’, inLogic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 1983, pp. 320–41.Google Scholar
  51. Tarski, Alfred: 1956b, ‘Foundations of the Geometry of Solids’, inLogic, Semantics, and Metamathematics, Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company, 1983, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
  52. Vendler, Zeno: 1971, ‘Singular Terms’, in Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits (eds.),Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 115–133.Google Scholar
  53. Wald, Jan: 1977,Stuff and Words: A Semantic and Linguistic Analysis of Non-Singular Reference, Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Almerindo E. Ojeda
    • 1
  1. 1.Linguistics ProgramUniversity of California at DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations