Abstract
Making use of the two-band model of the itinerant antiferromagnetism, we calculate the wave-vector-dependent paramagnetic susceptibility (i.e., the fluctuation propagator of the order parameter) and the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient above the Neel temperatureT N .We distinguish two regions depending on the degree of “the nesting” between the electron and the hole bands. The degree of the nesting is characterized byH, which measures the difference of the Fermi radii of the electron and the hole bands. WhenH is less than the critical nestingH*, the fluctuation is of the diffusion type indicating the transition into the commensurate spin density wave (CSDW) state; the fluctuation propagator diverges atT=T N forq=0 (the paramagnetic susceptibility diverges forq=G i /2;G i are the reciprocal lattice vectors) whereq is the wave number vector. WhenH>H*, on the other hand, the fluctuation propagator diverges atT=T N ,on the sphere in the wave vector space with the radiusq 0,signalling the transition into the incommensurate spin wave (ISDW) state; the paramagnetic susceptibility diverges now forq=(G i /2)+q′, where |q′|=q 0.The attenuation coefficient is much enhanced due to the spin fluctuation nearT N . We find that the attenuation coefficient of the longitudinal sound wave diverges atT=T N as η−3/2 forH≤H* and η−5/2 forH>H*, where η =(T/T N )−1. The latter prediction is in reasonable agreement with the recent measurement of the attenuation coefficient in pure Cr by Imai and Sawada.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. M. Lomer,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London)80, 489 (1962).
P. A. Fedders and P. C. Martin,Phys. Rev. 143, 245 (1965).
T. M. Rice,Phys. Rev. B2, 3619 (1970).
G. Sarma,Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1029 (1963).
K. Maki and T. Tsuneto,Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto)31, 945 (1964).
P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell,Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964).
A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Orchinnikov,Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964) [English trans.,Soviet Phys.—JETP 20, 762 (1965)].
D. Saint-James, G. Sarma, and E. J. Thomas,Type II Superconductivity (Pergamon Press, New York, 1968).
See, for example, A. S. Barker, Jr., and J. A. Ditzenberger,Phys. Rev. B1, 4378 (1970).
A. Jayaraman, T. M. Rice, and E. Bucher,J. Appl. Phys. 41, 869 (1970).
H. Fukuyama and T. Nagai,Phys. Rev. B3, 4413 (1971); and to be published inJ. Phys. Soc. Japan.
J. S. Imai and Y. Sawada,Phys. Letters 34A, 333 (1971).
T. L. Loucks,Phys. Rev. 139, 1181 (1965).
A. Arrott, S. A. Werner, and H. Kendrick,Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 1022 (1965).
T. J. Bastow,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London)88, 935 (1966).
S. A. Werner, A. Arrott, and H. Kendrick,Phys. Rev. 155, 528 (1967).
A. Schmid,Phys. Kondensierten Materie 5, 302 (1966).
E. Abrahams and T. Tsuneto,Phys. Rev. 152, 416 (1966).
A. B. Pippard,Phil. Mag. 46, 1104 (1955).
L. P. Kadanoff and I. I. Falko,Phys. Rev. 136, 1170 (1964).
L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin,Fiz. Tverd. Tela 10, 1104 (1968) [English transl.,Soviet Phys.—Solid State 10, 875 (1968)].
K. Maki,Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto)39, 897 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maki, K., Nakanishi, K. Paramagnetic susceptibility and ultrasonic attenuation of itinerant antiferromagnetism above the Neel temperature. J Low Temp Phys 6, 141–159 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630913
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630913