Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear susceptibility of liquid He3—II

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pulsed NMR measurements of the nuclear susceptibility of liquid He3 at various molar volumes are presented over the temperature range between 0.035 and 1°K. The scatter in the data is about 0.2%, while the absolute accuracy is estimated to be about ±1%. At temperaturesT such that χ0 T/C≲0.35 the susceptibility data can empirically be represented by the expression χ=χ0[1−β(x0 T/C)2]. Here χ0 is the extrapolated molar susceptibility atT=0 for a given volume, assuming the expression to be valid below 35 m°K.C is the molar Curie constant and β is a factor that appears to be somewhat dependent on molar volume and whose average value is found experimentally to be about 0.53. This result compares with the theoretical prediction by Béal-Monadet al. who used the paramagnon model for liquid He3 and obtained the expression given above with a value of β=0.58. However, the observed apparentT 2dependence of the susceptibility is over a greater temperature range than the theory would lead one to expect, and this point is discussed. The experimental results are also compared with a “molecular-field” approach by Goldstein, who proposed a representation of the susceptibility by a universal curve χT/C=f(χ0 T/C), wheref is the function for the ideal gas. In spite of some systematic discrepancies, a scaled presentation of the data is in good overall agreement with the calculated curve. The data disagree with the Stoner model of a Fermi gas with interactions. Finally, the values of χ0 are compared with those of previous work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. C. Anderson, W. Reese, and J. C. Wheatley,Phys. Rev. 127, 671 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. L. Thomson, H. Meyer, and E. D. Adams,Phys. Rev. 128, 509 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. T. Beal and J. Hatton,Phys. Rev. 139, A1751 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, e.g., A. A. Abrikosov and I. M. Khalatnikov,Soviet Phys. Uspeki 66, 68 (1958);Rept. Progr. Phys. 22, 329 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Doniach and S. Engelsberg,Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 750 (1966); D. J. Amit, J. W. Kane, and H. Wagner,Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 425 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. C. Stoner,Proc. Roy. Soc. A152, 672 (1935); J. McDougall and E. C. Stoner,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 237, 67 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. L. Jordan and K. R. Crandall (unpublished).

  8. L. Goldstein,Phys. Rev. 133, A52 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. C. Stoner,Proc. Roy. Soc. A153, 656 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. M. Richards,Phys. Rev. 132, 1867 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. R. Abel, A. C. Anderson, W. C. Black, and J. C. Wheatley,Phys. Rev. 147, 111 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. T. Béal-Monod, S. K. Ma, and D. Fredkin,Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 929 (1968), and private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Wheatley, “Experimental properties of pure He3 and dilute solutions of He3 in superfluid He4 at very low temperatures,”Progress in Low-Temperature Physics, Vol. VI, (C. J. Gorter, ed.) (to be published). See also William E. Keller,Helium-3 and Helium-4 (Plenum Press, New York, 1969), Chapter 6. See also S. Doniach,Proc. Eleventh International Conference on Low-Temperature Physics, (J. F. Allen, D. M. Finlayson, and D. M. McCall, Eds.) (St. Andrews University Press, 1968), p. 76.

  14. D. Fredkin, private communication.

  15. J. R. Thompson, H. Ramm, J. F. Jarvis, and H. Meyer,J. Low Temp. Phys. 2, 521 (1970) (the preceding paper in this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. C. Richardson, E. R. Hunt, and H. Meyer,Phys. Rev. 138, A1326 (1965), as corrected inJ. Appl. Phys. 39, 390 (1968). The volume dependence of the exchange integral so found has been confirmed by Panczyk and Adams [Phys. Rev. 187, 321 (1969)], who obtained more accurate values ofJ from (∂P/∂T) v measurements, and also by the authors of Ref. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., W. P. Kirk, E. B. Osgood, and M. Garber,Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 833 (1969), and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. G. Richards, J. Hatton, and R. Giffard,Phys. Rev. 139, 91 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. R. Hunt, R. C. Richardson, J. R. Thompson, R. A. Guyer, and H. Meyer,Phys. Rev. 163, 181 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Giffard, Thesis, Oxford University, 1968 (unpublished).

  21. W. C. Black, W. R. Roach, and J. C. Wheatley,Rev. Sci. Inst. 35, 587 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Lawless, private communication.

  23. C. Boghosian, H. Meyer, and J. E. Rives,Phys. Rev. 146, 110 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. F. Brinkman and S. Engelsberg,Phys. Rev. 169, 417 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, e.g., J. M. Ziman,Electrons and Phonons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1960), Chapter 1.11, p. 52, and references therein. See also H. H. Sample and C. A. Swenson,Phys. Rev. 158, 188 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and from the Army Research Office (Durham).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramm, H., Pedroni, P., Thompson, J.R. et al. Nuclear susceptibility of liquid He3—II. J Low Temp Phys 2, 539–553 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628273

Keywords

Navigation