Skip to main content
Log in

NP trace in theta theory

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bach, E.: 1980, ‘In Defense of Passive’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 297–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T.: 1982, ‘Implicit Arguments and the Projection Principle’, ????

  • van Riemsdijk H. and E. Williams: 1982, ‘NP-Structure’,The Linguistic Review 1, 171–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1974,Rule Ordering in Syntax, MIT dissertation, Combridge, Mass.

  • Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’,The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1984, ‘Grammatical Relations’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 639–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1984b, ‘PRO in NP’, manuscript.

  • Williams E.: 1986, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, E. NP trace in theta theory. Linguist Philos 10, 433–447 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628065

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628065

Keywords

Navigation