Skip to main content
Log in

Cardioselectivity of atenolol in asthmatic patients

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This double-blind, randomised, within patient, placebo-controlled study set out to investigate the effect of a cardioselective beta-blocker, atenolol, at different oral doses (50, 100 and 200 mg) and a non-selective agent, propranolol (40 mg), upon 1. airways resistance (forced expiratory volume at one second=FEV1) and 2. the bronchodilator action of increasing doses of inhaled isoprenaline, in patients with co-existent hypertension and reversible airways obstruction. In 10 patients, two hours after drug administration, the 3 doses of atenolol caused a significantly greater (P<0.05) degree of B1-blockade than propranolol. In contrast the 3 doses of atenolol caused significantly less (P<0.05 to 0.01) B2-blockade as evidenced by a smaller fall in FEV1. The isoprenaline FEV1 dose response curves were displaced progressively to the right of the placebo curve with increasing doses of atenolol, but the greatest displacement was with propranolol. It was concluded that patients with reversible airways obstruction who require beta-blockade should be given a low dose of a cardioselective agent in conjunction with, if required, a beta2 stimulant such as isoprenaline. Such a treatment will be less likely to cause a troublesome increase in airways resistance and the bronchodilator action of the beta2 stimulant will be almost fully preserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNeill RS (1971) The effect of beta-antagonists on the bronchi. Postgrad Med J 47: 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vilsvik JS, Schaanning J (1976) The effect of atenolol on ventilatory and cardiac function in asthma. Br Med J 2: 453–455

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh BN, Nisbet HD, Harris EA, Whitlock RM (1975) A comparison of the actions of ICI 66,082 and propranolol on cardiac and peripheral beta adrenoreceptors. Eur J Pharmacol 34: 75–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waal-Manning HJ, Simpson FO (1971) Practolol treatment in asthmatics. Lancet 2: 1264–1265

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zacharias FJ, Cuthbertson PJR, Prestt J, Cowen KJ, Johnson TBW, Thompson J, Vickers J, Simpson WT, Tuson R (1977) Atenolol in hypertension: a study of long-term therapy. Postgrad Med J 53: (Suppl. 3) 102–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Formgren H (1976) The effect of metoprolol and practolol on lung function and blood pressure in hypertensive asthmatics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 1007–1014

    Google Scholar 

  7. Decalmer PBS, Chatterjee SS, Cruickshank JM, Benson MK, Sterling GM (1978) Beta-blockers and asthma. Br Heart J 40: 184–189

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benson MK, Berrill WT, Cruickshank JM, Sterling GS (1978) A comparison of four beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with asthma. Br J Clin Pharmacol 5: 415–419

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carruthers SG, Ghosal A, McDevitt DG, Nelson JK, Shanks RG (1974) The assessment of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in hyperthyroidism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tattersfield AE, Mackay AD, Gribben HR, Baldwin CJ: How cardioselective are the new beta-blocking drugs? Sixth Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Hypertension, Gothenburg 173: June 1979 (abstr.)

  11. Conway FJ, Fitzgerald JD, McAinsh J, Rowlands DJ, Simpson WT (1976) Human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on atenolol (ICI 66,082), a new cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 267–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellis, M.E., Sahay, J.N., Chatterjee, S.S. et al. Cardioselectivity of atenolol in asthmatic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 21, 173–176 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627916

Key words

Navigation