Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 411–462 | Cite as

Reciprocals andsame/different: Towards a semantic analysis

  • Friederike Moltmann


Artificial Intelligence Semantic Analysis Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barss, A.: 1986,Chains and Anaphoric Dependence, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Belletti, A.: 1982, ‘On the Anaphoric Status of Reciprocal Constructions in Italian’,The Linguistic Review 2(2).Google Scholar
  3. van Benthem, J.: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantification’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, G.: 1987, ‘Same and Different: Some Consequences for Syntax and Semantics’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1975, ‘Questions of Form and Interpretation’,Linguistic Analysis 1.Google Scholar
  6. : 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, R. and E. Keenan: 1985/6, ‘The Absorption Operator’,The Linguistic Review 5(2).Google Scholar
  8. : 1986, ‘On the Syntax and Semantics of Binary (n-ary) Quantification’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL),5, Stanford Linguistic Association, Dept. of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, D.: 1966, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Davidson (1980).Google Scholar
  10. : 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. DeMey, S.: 1981, ‘The Dependent Plural and the Analysis of Tense’, in A. Burke and J. Pustejovsky (eds.),Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS),11. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  12. Dougherty, R. C.: 1970, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjunction, Part 1’,Language 46.Google Scholar
  13. —: 1971, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjunction, Part 2’,Language 47.Google Scholar
  14. —: 1974, ‘The Syntax and Semantics ofEach Other Constructions’,Foundations of Language 12.Google Scholar
  15. Dowty, D.: 1985, ‘A Unified Indexical Analysis of Same and Different, A Response to Stump and Carlson’. Paper presented at the University of Texas Workshop on Syntax and Semantics, Austin, Texas, March 22–24, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. Fiengo, R. and J. Higginbotham: 1981, ‘Opacity in NP’,Linguistic Analysis 7(4). Fiengo, R. and H. Lasnik: 1973, ‘The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English’,Foundations of Language 9.Google Scholar
  17. Gärdenfors, P. (ed.): 1987,Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Heim, I.: 1985, ‘Notes on Comparatives and Related Matters’, Ms. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Heim, I., H. Lasnik and R. May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 22.Google Scholar
  20. Higginbotham, J.: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’,Journal of Linguistic Research 1.Google Scholar
  21. —: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16.Google Scholar
  22. Huang, J.: 1982, ‘Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  23. Kayne, R.: 1975,French Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  24. Keenan, E.: 1987, ‘Unreduciblen-ary Quantifiers in Natural Language’, in Gärdenfors (ed.), (1987).Google Scholar
  25. Landman, F.: 1989, ‘Groups I’ and ‘Groups II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12.Google Scholar
  26. Langendoen, T.: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’,Linguistic Inquiry 8.Google Scholar
  27. Lebeaux, D.: 1983, ‘A Distributional Difference Between Reflexives and Reciprocals’,Linguistic Inquiry 8.Google Scholar
  28. Lieb, H.: 1983,Integrational Linguistics General Outline, Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Nouns’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. —: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in Gärdenfors (ed.), 1987).Google Scholar
  31. Loenning, J.-T.: 1989, ‘Some Aspects of the Logic of Plural Noun Phrases’, Cosmos Report No. 11, Dept. of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  32. May, R.: 1977,The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. disertation, MIT, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  33. Moltmann, F.: 1990a,On the Part Relation in Semantics, Ms. MIT, Cambridge (Mass).Google Scholar
  34. : 1990b, ‘The Multidimensional Part Structure of Events’, in A. Halpern (ed.),Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 9. Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  35. : 1990c, ‘Semantic Selection and the Determination of the Part Structures in the Use of Natural Language’, in: M. Stokhof et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium. ITLT, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. : 1992,Individuation und Lokalität, Studien zur Nominalphrasen und Ereignissemantik. Fink Verlag, Munich.Google Scholar
  37. Nunberg, G.: 1984, ‘Individuation in Context’, in M. Cobler et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 3, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  38. Riemsdijk, H. van and E. Williams: 1980, ‘NP-Structure’,Linguistic Review 1(3).Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphors and Distributivity, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, E.: 1986, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’,Linguistic Inquiry 17.Google Scholar
  41. —: 1991, ‘Reciprocal Scope’,Linguistic Inquiry 22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friederike Moltmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMassachusetts Institute of Technology20E D213 CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations