Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized conjunction and temporal modification

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bach, Emmon: 1986. ‘The Algebra of Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon: 1989,The Situation in Logic, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, George: 1982,Quality and Concept, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, George: 1989, ‘On the Identification of Properties and Propositional Functions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1987, ‘Same and Different: Some Consequences for Syntax and Semantics’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 531–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, University of Massachusetts dissertation.

  • Cooper, Robin, Kuniaki Mukai, and John Perry: 1990,Situation Theory and Its Applications, vol. 1. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max: 1985,Structured Meanings, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R., Robert E. Wall and Stanley Peters: 1981,Introduction to Montague Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1980, ‘A Cross -Categorial Semantics for Conjunction’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 407–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, Robert: 1976, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in T. Bever et al. (eds.),An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Erhard: 1985,A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English, Ohio State University, doctoral dissertation.

  • Hinrichs, Erhard: 1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English,’Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack; 1988, ‘The Semantics of Non-BooleanAnd’,Journal of Semantics 6, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward and Leonard Faltz: 1985,Boolean Semantics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, ‘An Investigation into the Lumps of Thought’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in R. Bartsch et al. (eds.)Semantics and Contextual Expression, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1990a, ‘Boolean and Non-BooleanAnd’,Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Akaémiai Kiádo, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1990b, ‘Four Thousand Ships Passed through the Lock: Object-Induced Measure Functions on Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1984, ‘Data Semantics for Attitude Reports’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, 193–218, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1988,A Semantics for Groups and Events, Ohio State University doctoral dissertation.

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1989, ‘Adjectival Conjunction and Other Leftovers,' Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1990, ‘Group Action and Spatio-Temporal Proximity’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1987, ‘Algebraic Semantics for Event Structures’ in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Jerry: 1972, ‘Verb Agreement as a Rule of English’,Proceedings of the 8th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara, and Mats Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John: 1985, ‘Complex Phrases and Complex Sentences’, in T. Shopen (ed.),Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, Richmond: 1980, ‘A Model Theory for Propositional Attitudes’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, Frank: 1981, ‘Data Semantics’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

An early version of this paper was presented at the 1989 Minnesota Conference on Language and Linguistics in Minneapolis; significantly different versions were presented at the 1990 Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft in Gosen and the 1990-91 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in Chicago. Thanks to everyone who commented at these talks or on the manuscript, particularly Michael Kac, Ed Keenan, Alice ter Meulen, Fritz Hamm, and Roger Schwarzschild, as well as the Semantics Reading Group at UC Santa Cruz, and two anonymous referees. Remaining errors are my own, of course.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lasersohn, P. Generalized conjunction and temporal modification. Linguist Philos 15, 381–410 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627682

Keywords

Navigation