Does the gravitational “constant” increase?
- 49 Downloads
The possibility that the gravitational coupling “constant”G is an increasing function of the cosmic timet is discussed.
In Section 1 the Maximal Power Hypothesis (MPH) stating that no power in Nature can exceed the upper boundc5/G (Gunn's luminosity) is advocated.
In Sections 2, 3, and 4 the MPH is employed on the cosmological scale to support the idea of an increasingG. In Section 2 the increasingG is obtained by two assumptions - the MPH and the energy conservation law - and by nothing else.
In Section 3 the increasingG follows naturally from the MPH in the Einstein-Cartan theory of gravity. The arguments proposed in Sections 2 and 3 lead todG(t)/dt > 0 but cannot specify the form ofG(t). In Section 4 the MPH is applied to the energy of the vacuum and leads to a relation betweenG and the cosmological term,G α ΛS3, valid in a matter-dominated universe (S =S(t) is the expansion factor). This relation plus the time-dependence law (suggested by many authors) Λt2 = constant, plustH > 2/3 (suggested by observations on the age of globular clusters;H is the Hubble parameter) implies an increasingG. One finds also Λ αGU, whereU is the mass density of the universe, in agreement with other studies.
KeywordsEnergy Conservation Mass Density Hubble Parameter Globular Cluster Expansion Factor
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abdel-Rahman, A.-M.M.: 1990,Gen. Rel. Grav. 22, 655.Google Scholar
- Berman, M.S.: 1991,Phys. Rev. D 43, 1075.Google Scholar
- Berman, M.S. and Som, M.M.: 1990,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 29, 1411.Google Scholar
- Bertolami, O.: 1986,N. Cimento B 93, 36.Google Scholar
- Butcher, H.R.: 1987,Nature 328, 127.Google Scholar
- Damour, T.et al.: 1988,Phys. Rev. Letters 61, 1151.Google Scholar
- De Sabbata, V. and Gasperini, M.: 1980,Lett. N. Cimento 27, 133.Google Scholar
- De Sabbata, V. and Sivaram, C.: 1993,Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 561.Google Scholar
- Felten, J.E. and Isaacman, R.: 1986,Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 689.Google Scholar
- Ford, L.H.: 1987,Phys. Rev. D 35, 2339.Google Scholar
- Hawking, S.W.: 1984,Phys. Lett. B 134, 403.Google Scholar
- Hehl, F.W., Von Der Heyde, P., Kerlick, G.D., and Nester, J.M.: 1976,Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 393.Google Scholar
- Hellings, R.W.et al.: 1983,Phys. Rev. Letters 51, 1609.Google Scholar
- Massa, C.: 1994,Astrophys. Space Sci. 215, 59.Google Scholar
- O'Connel, R.F.: 1976,Phys. Rev. Letters 37, 1653.Google Scholar
- Reasenberg, R.D.: 1983,Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 310A, 227.Google Scholar
- Sivaram, C. and Garcia de Andrade, L.C.: 1993,Astrophys. Space Sci. 201, 131.Google Scholar
- Wetterlich, C.: 1988,Nucl. Phys. B 302, 668.Google Scholar