Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 209, Issue 2, pp 169–180 | Cite as

Radio source orientation and the cosmological interpretation of the angular size-redshift relation for double-lobed quasars

  • A. A. Ubachukwu
  • L. I. Onuora
Article

Abstract

The angular size-redshift test for quasars was compared with various cosmological models including non standard models. The possible effects of radio source orientation and relativistic beaming were taken into account in the analysis.

It was found that orientation effects alone were not sufficient to explain the observedθ-z relation in terms of Friedmann models. In addition, linear size evolution of the formD ~ (1 +z)n, with 0.75 ≲n ≲ 1.2 would be required for 0 ≲ Ω ≲ 1.0, or possibly an inverse correlation between luminosity and linear size. The non-standard cosmological models all gave better fits to the deprojected data than the Friedmann models in the absence of evolutionary effects, with the tired light effect providing the best fit.

Keywords

Inverse Correlation Cosmological Model Radio Source Evolutionary Effect Linear Size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthel, P. D. and Miley, G.K.: 1988,Nature 333, 319.Google Scholar
  2. Garrington, S.T.: 1988, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  3. Gopal-Krishna and Wiita, P.J.: 1988,Astron. Astrophys. 192, 37.Google Scholar
  4. Guth, A.H.: 1981,Phys. Rev. D 23, 347.Google Scholar
  5. Hickson, P.: 1977,Astrophys. J. 217, 964.Google Scholar
  6. Hough, D.H. and Readhead, A.C.S.: 1989,Astron. J. 98, 1202.Google Scholar
  7. Kapahi, V.K.: 1975,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 172, 513.Google Scholar
  8. Kapahi, V.K.: 1975,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 214, 19p.Google Scholar
  9. Kapahi, V.K.: 1986, in: J.P. Swings (ed.),Highlights of Astronomy 7, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 371.Google Scholar
  10. Kapahi, V.K.: 1987 in: A. Hewitt, G. Burbidge and L.Z. Fang (eds.),Observational Cosmology, IAU Symp.124, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, p. 251.Google Scholar
  11. Kapahi, V.K.: 1989,Astron. J. 97, 1.Google Scholar
  12. Kapahi, V.K. and Saikia, D.J.: 1982,J. Astroph. Astron. 3, 465.Google Scholar
  13. La Violette, P.: 1986,Astrophys. J. 301, 544.Google Scholar
  14. Mattig, W.: 1959,Astr. Nachr., 285.Google Scholar
  15. Miley, G.K.: 1968,Nature 218, 93.Google Scholar
  16. Miley, G.K.: 1971,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 18, 477.Google Scholar
  17. Onuora, L.I.: 1979,Astrophys. Space Sci. 136, 11.Google Scholar
  18. Onuora, L.I.: 1991,Astrophys. J. 377, 36.Google Scholar
  19. Onuora, L.I.: 1992,Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Onuora, L.I. and Ubachukwu, A.A.: 1992, (submitted to Astrophys. J.).Google Scholar
  21. Oort, M..J.et al.: 1987,Astron. Astrophys. 179, 41.Google Scholar
  22. Orr, M.J.L. and Browne, I.W.A.: 1982,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 200, 1067.Google Scholar
  23. Peacock, J.A. and Wall, J.V.: 1981,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 194, 331.Google Scholar
  24. Peebles, P.J.E.: 1988,Pub. Astron. Soc. Pac. 100, 670.Google Scholar
  25. Petit, J.P. and Viton, M.: 1989,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 2201.Google Scholar
  26. Wardle, J.F.C. and Miley, G.K.: 1974,Astron. Astrophys. 30, 3O5.Google Scholar
  27. Wills, D.: 1979,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 39, 291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Ubachukwu
    • 1
  • L. I. Onuora
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations