Abstract
The development of an international climate policy builds on national policy perspectives. These depend on the perceived risks of climate change, socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of the nations and regions involved, and the technical feasibility of policy measures. Scientific and technological research supports the policy making process about these issues. The perspectives of the scientific community and the policy makers differ and as a consequence communication is often troublesome. The construction and utilization of knowledge under such circumstances can only be effective if all parties involved engage in a continuous dialogue about causes, effects, impacts and responses. This paper describes a project carried out in the Netherlands. It has as its major objective the articulation of a variety of perceptions and positions related to climate change. As a result of the project, policy actors produced five policy options and formulated research questions. The policy options are linked in the framework of a policy life cycle. Research questions focus on the risks of climate change and on feasible social, economic, cultural and technological responses to it. As to the policy options, striving for common means appears to be more promising than pursuing shared goals and philosophies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernabo, J.C.: 1992, ‘Joint Climate Project to Address Decision Maker's Uncertainties’. SPA-Report, Washington, D.C.
Bolin B.: 1994, ‘Next Step for Climate-Change Analysis’.Nature 368, 94
Klabbers J.H.G.: 1982, ‘Futures Research and Public Policy Making: A context of use for Systems Theory and Gaming’. In Kallen D.B.P.et al. (eds.)Social Science Research and Public Policy Making, The NFER-Nelson Publishing Company Ltd., Windsor.
Klabbers J.H.G.: 1985, ‘Instruments for Planning and Policy Formation: Some Methodological Considerations’.Simulation and Games 16(2), 135–160.
Klabbers J.H.G., Vellinga P., Janssen R. Swart R.J. and Van Ulden A.P.: 1994, ‘NRP-Project “Policy Options Addressing Climate Change”’. Reports of Working Conferences I; IIA and IIB; III (In Dutch). Secretariat NRP-RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Klabbers J.H.G., Vellinga P., Janssen R. Swart R.J. and Van Ulden A.P.: 1994, ‘NRP-Project “Policy Options Addressing Climate Change”’. Executive Summary. Secretariat NRP-RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Mitchell D.E.: 1980, ‘Social Science Impact on Legislative Decision Making: Process & Substance’.Educational Researcher 9, 10.
Winsemius P. and Guntram U.: 1991, ‘Responding to the Environmental Challenge’. McKinsey & Company, The Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klabbers, J.H.G., Swart, R.J., Janssen, R. et al. Climate science and climate policy: Improving the science/policy interface. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 1, 73–93 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00625616
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00625616