, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 111–127 | Cite as

Analysis of neonatally induced tolerance of H-2 alloantigens

II. Failure to detect alloantigen-specific T-lymphocyte precursors and suppressors
  • Rebecca S. Gruchalla
  • J. Wayne Streilein
Original Investigations


There is a considerable amount of evidence, confirmed and extended by our studies, in favor of clonal deletion of alloantigen-reactive cells in neonatally induced transplantation tolerance. We have demonstrated in adult mice bearing long-standing skin allografts that lymphocytes specifically reactive with the tolerated H-2 alloantigens are undetectable by mixed lymphocyte and graftversus-host reactions, and in cell-mediated lympholysis. In addition, lymphoid cells capable of suppressing the reactivity of syngeneic normal lymphocytes in these assays similarly escape detection. Moreover, putative precursors of T cells specific for the tolerated antigens cannot be activated polyclonally with concanavalin A (Con A), nor can they be identified among thymocytes ofH-2-tolerant mice. Since the tolerant state can be adoptively transferred with lymphohematopoietic cells to adult, syngeneic mice, we infer that transplantation tolerance is maintained by an active process that achieves specific clonal deletion at an early stage in the ontogeny of alloreactive T lymphocytes.


Active Process Adult Mouse Lymphoid Cell Concanavalin Tolerant State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkins, R. C. and Ford, W. L.: The effect of lymphocytes and serum from tolerant rats on the graft versus host activity of normal lymphocytes.Transplantation 13: 442–444, 1972Google Scholar
  2. Beverley, P. C. L., Brent, L., Brooks, C., Medawar, P. B., and Simpson, E.: In vitro reactivity of lymphoid cells from tolerant mice.Transplant. Proc. 5: 679–684, 1973Google Scholar
  3. Billingham, R. E., Silvers, W. K., and Wilson, D. B.: Further studies on adoptive transfer of sensitivity to skin homogafts.J. Exp. Med. 118: 397–420, 1963Google Scholar
  4. Brent, L., Brooks, C. G., Medawar, P. B., and Simpson, E.: Transplantation tolerance.Br. Med. Bull. 32: 101–106, 1976Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, C. G.: Neonatally induced transplantation tolerance:In vitro evidence supporting a clonal inactivation mechanism.Eur. J. Immunol. 5: 741–747, 1975Google Scholar
  6. Dorsch, S. and Roser, B.: Recirculating, suppressor T cells in transplantation tolerance.J. Exp. Med. 145: 1144–1157, 1977Google Scholar
  7. Dorsch, S. and Roser, B.: The nature and mode of action of suppressor cells in transplantation tolerance.In J. L. Preud'homme and V. H. L. Hawken (eds.):Fourth International Congress of Immunology: Abstract 17. 6. 10, 1980Google Scholar
  8. Elkins, W. L.: Cellular control of lymphocytes initiating grafts-vs-host reactions.Cell. Immunol. 4: 192–196, 1972Google Scholar
  9. Gorczynski, R. M. and MacRae, S.: Suppression of cytotoxic response to histoincompatible cells. 1. Evidence for two types of T lymphocyte-derived suppressors acting at different stages in the induction of a cytotoxic response.J. Immunol. 122: 737–746, 1979Google Scholar
  10. Hašek, M., Holáň, V., and Chutna, J.: Comparison of neonatally and adoptively induced transplantation tolerance in mice.Folia Biol. (Praha) 26: 167–175, 1980Google Scholar
  11. Holáň, V., Chutna, J., and Hašek, M.: Specific suppressor cells in rats with neonatally induced transplantation tolerance.Folia Biol. (Praha) 23: 66–71, 1977Google Scholar
  12. Holáň, V., Hašek, M., and Chutna, J.: Radiosensitivity of suppressor cells in neonatally tolerant rats.Transplantation 25: 27–30, 1978aGoogle Scholar
  13. Holán, V., Chutná, J., and Hašek, M.: Participation ofH-2 regions in neonatally induced transplantation tolerance.Immunogenetics 6: 397–401, 1978bGoogle Scholar
  14. HOláň, V., Hašek, M., and Chutná, J.: Suppression of allosensitization in vitro by cells from tolerant rats.Folia Biol. (Praha) 24: 95–103, 1978cGoogle Scholar
  15. Holáň, V., Chutná, J., and Hašek, M.: Individual variability and correlation of the in vitro tests in tolerant rats.Folia Biol. (Praha) 24: 15–23, 1978dGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiessling, R., Klein, E., and Wigzell, H.: “Natural” killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Specificity and distribution according to genotype.Eur. J. Immunol. 5: 112–117, 1975Google Scholar
  17. Klein, J., Flaherty, L., VandeBerg, J. L., and Shreffler, D. C.:H-2 haplotypes, genes, regions, and antigens First listing.Immunogenetics 6: 489–512, 1978Google Scholar
  18. Ramseier, H.: Immunization against abolition of transplantation tolerance.Eur. J. Immunol. 3: 156–164, 1973Google Scholar
  19. Rieger, M. and Hilgert, L: The involvement of a suppressor mechanism in neonatally induced allograft tolerance in mice.J. Immunogenet. 4: 61–67, 1977Google Scholar
  20. Roser, B. and Dorsch, S.: The cellular basis of transplantation tolerance in the rat.Immunol. Rev. 46: 55–86, 1979Google Scholar
  21. Streilein, J. W. and Klein, J.: Neonatal tolerance across regions ofH-2 complex.J. lmmunol. 119: 2947–2950, 1977Google Scholar
  22. Streilein, J. W.: Neonatal tolerance: Towards an immunogenetic definition of self.Immunol. Rev. 46: 125–145, 1979Google Scholar
  23. Streilein, J. W. and Gruchalla, R. S.: Analysis of neonatally induced tolerance ofH-2 alloantigens. I. Adoptive transfer indicates that tolerance of class I and class II antigens is maintained by distinct mechanisms.Immunogenetics 12: 161–173, 1981Google Scholar
  24. Streilein, J. W., Gruchalla, R. S., and Strome, P.: Neonatal transplantation tolerance results from two types of suppression acting during induction and at the effector phase.Transplant. Proc. 13: 578–581, 1981Google Scholar
  25. Waterfield, J. D., Waterfield, E. M., and Möller, G.: Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity against tumor cells. 1. Con A activated cytotoxic effector cells exhibit immunological specificity.Cell. Immunol. 17: 392–404, 1975Google Scholar
  26. Waterfield, J. D., Bick, P. H., Möller, E., and Möller, G.: Presence of alloantigen-reactive cells in neonatally tolerized mice.Scand. J. Immunol. 7: 435–438, 1978Google Scholar
  27. Wu, S.: Ontogeny of cell-mediated immunity of murine thymocytes and spleen cells—In vitro mixed leukocyte culture and cell-mediated lympholysis reactions.Differentiation 11: 169–174, 1978Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca S. Gruchalla
    • 1
  • J. Wayne Streilein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at DallasDallas

Personalised recommendations