Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 165, Issue 2, pp 179–192 | Cite as

Properties of elementary movement detectors in the flyCalliphora erythrocephala

  • F. H. Schuling
  • H. A. K. Mastebroek
  • R. Bult
  • B. P. M. Lenting
Article

Summary

Experiments, involving sequential micro-stimulation of two (or more) adjacent neuroommatidia in the compound eye of the blowfly,Calliphora erythrocephala (Mg.), are presented. These experiments, using brief flashes of 3 ms duration with low intensities in the order of 8·10−3 Cd/m2, are performed to isolate individual response contributions of single Elementary Movement Detectors in the input micro-circuitry of the motion-sensitive directionally-selective H1-neuron (Figs. 4 through 6). A two-dimensional mapping of single EMD contributions to the overall response will be presented for the dark adapted eye (Fig. 7). It is concluded that under such low illumination levels (when compared to normal daylight situations, where illumination typically varies between 1 and 200 Cd/m2), contributions from EMD's with sampling bases up to 8Δ φ h, oriented along the horizontal sensitivity axis of the neuron, contribute to the total response of the neuron. In addition, results will be presented for similar experiments, in which various backgrounds with different sizes and intensities are superimposed on the sequence of stimulus flashes (Fig. 8). The dependence of the relative contributions for the smallest four sampling bases (i.e. 2, ..., 8 timesΔ φ h) on background size, background intensity and distance of the background field to the projections of the flashes, will be discussed. Supplementary experiments (Figs. 9 through 12) will be presented, which indicate that when in addition to an ongoing sequence in (for instance) the null direction, thus inhibiting the activity of the neuron, a second sequence is presented somewhere in the receptive field of the H1-neuron, the total response is a non-linear combination of both individual responses. Interpretation in terms of a pooling correlation scheme, which, over a limited target region, sums the activities of the EMD's in a highly non-linear fashion, provides a qualitative explanation.

Keywords

Prefer Direction Apparent Movement Movement Detector Sampling Base Background Field 

Abbreviations

EMD

elementary movement detecors

H1-neuron

horizontally-selective motion sensitive neuron in the lobula plate

PSTH

post stimulus time histogram

Δ φ

inter-ommatidial angle

FFRP

far field radiation pattern

F1

wild-type

R1–6

classes of retinula cells in each fly ommatidium

Cx,y

nomenclature for the EMD's

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 24:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Franceschini N (1975) Sampling of the visual environment by the compound eye of the fly: Fundamentals and applications. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 98–125Google Scholar
  3. Franceschini N (1984) Chromatic organization and sexual dimorphism in the fly retinal mosaic. In: Borselino A, Cerveletto L (eds) Photoreceptors. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 319–350Google Scholar
  4. Hateren JH van (1987) Photoreceptor optics and neural microcircuitry in the insect eye. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  5. Hausen K (1976) Functional characterization and anatomical identification of motion sensitive neurons in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. Z Naturforsch 31c:629–633Google Scholar
  6. Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the lobula plate of the fly. Verb Dtsch Zool Ges: 49–70Google Scholar
  7. Hausen K (1982a) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. I. The horizontal cells: Structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hausen K (1982b) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heisenberg M, Buchner E (1977) The role of retinula cell types in visual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 117:127–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hengstenberg R (1982) Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of blowflyCalliphora. J Comp Physiol 149:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hengstenberg R, Hausen K, Hengstenberg B (1982) The number and structure of giant vertical (VS) cells in the lobular plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala. J Comp Physiol 149:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirschfeld K (1972) The visual system ofMusca: studies on optics, structure, and function. In: Wehner R (ed) Information processing in the visual systems of arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–74Google Scholar
  13. Kirschfeld K, Lutz B (1974) Lateral inhibition in the compound eye of the fly,Musca. Z Naturforsch 29c:95–97Google Scholar
  14. Koch C, Poggio T (1986) Computations in the vertebrate retina: motion discrimination, gain enhancement and differentiation. Trends Neurosci 9:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenting BPM (1985) Functional characteristics of a wide-field movement processing neuron in the blowfly visual system. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  16. Mastebroek HAK, Zaagman WH, Lenting BPM (1982) Memory-like effects in fly vision: Spatio-temporal interactions in a wide-field neuron. Biol Cybern 43:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pick B, Buchner E (1979) Visual movement detection under light- and dark-adaptation in the fly,Musca domestica. J Comp Physiol 134:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poggio T, Reichardt W, Hausen K (1981) A neural circuitry for relative movement discrimination by the visual system of the fly. Naturwissenschaften 68:443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poggio T, Koch C (1987) Synapses that compute motion. Sci Am 255:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reichardt W, Poggio T (1979) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly. Part 1: Experimental results. Biol Cybern 35:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reichardt W, Poggio T, Hausen K (1983) Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of fly. Biol Cybern 46 [Suppl]:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riehle A, Franceschini N (1984) Motion detection in flies: parametric control over ON-OFF pathways. Exp Brain Res 54:390–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruyter van Steveninck RR de (1986) Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  24. Schuling FH (1988) Processing of moving images in natural and artificial visual systems. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  25. Srinivasan MV, Dvorak DR (1980) Spatial processing of visual information in the movement-detecting pathway of the fly. J Comp Physiol 140:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stavenga DG (1975) The neural superposition eye and its optical demands. J Comp Physiol 102:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tinbergen J (1987) Photoreceptor metabolism and visually guided landing behaviour of flies. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  28. Torre V, Poggio T (1978) A synaptic mechanism possibly underlying directional selectivity to motion. Proc R Soc Lond B 202:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zaagman WH (1977) Some characteristics of the neural activity of directionally selective movement detectors in the visual system of the blowfly. Thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Schuling
    • 1
  • H. A. K. Mastebroek
    • 1
  • R. Bult
    • 1
  • B. P. M. Lenting
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for General Physics, Biophysics DepartmentUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations