Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chains of single-domain magnetite particles in chinook salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Although the presence of magnetite in their tissues is correlated with the ability of different species to detect magnetic fields, proof that the magnetite is involved in magnetoreception has not yet been provided. Using the approach employed to localize and isolate magnetic particles in the yellowfin tuna, we found that single-domain magnetite occurs in chains of particles in tissue contained within the dermethmoid cartilage of adult chinook salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. The particles are present in sufficient numbers to provide the adult fish with a very sensitive magnetoreceptor system. Magnetite in the chinook can be correlated with responses to magnetic fields in a congeneric species, the sockeye salmon. Based on the presence of the chains of particles, we propose behavioral experiments that exploit the responses of sockeye salmon fry to magnetic fields to test explicit predictions of the ferromagnetic magnetoreception hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RR, Mather JG, Kennaugh JH (1983) Magnetic bones in human sinuses. Nature 301:78–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkwill DL, Maratea D, Blakemore RP (1980) Ultrastructure of a magnetotactic spirillum. J Bacteriol 141:1399–1408

    Google Scholar 

  • Beason RC, Nicholls JC (1984) Magnetic orientation and magnetically sensitive material in a transequatorial migratory bird. Nature 309:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EL (1972) Mechanisms controlling migration of sockeye salmon fry. Int Pac Sal Fish Comm Bull 21:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Branover GG, Vasil'yev AS, Gleyzer SI, Tsinober AB (1971) A study of the behavior of the eel in natural and artificial magnetic fields and an analysis of its reception mechanism. J Ichthyol 11:608–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler RF, Banerjee SK (1975) Theoretical single-domain size in magnetite and titanomagnetite. J Geophys Res 80:4049–4058

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisowski S (1981) Interacting vs non-interacting single-domain behavior in natural and synthetic samples. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 26:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop DJ, West GF (1969) An experimental evaluation of single-domain theories. Rev Geophys 7:709–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth HP, Waniek RW (1956) Production and use of high transient magnetic fields. Rev Sci Instr 27:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Goree WS, Fuller M (1976) Magnetometers using RF-driven SQUIDS and their applications in rock magnetism and paleomagnetism. Rev Geophys Space Phys 14:591–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL (1982) The map sense of pigeons. Nature 296:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL, Kirschvink JL, Deffeyes KS (1978) Bees have magnetic remanence. Science 201:1026–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson M, Karlsson L, Westerberg H (1984a) Magnetic material in European eel, (Anguilla anguilla L.). Comp Biochem Physiol 77A:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson M, Wirmark G, Oblad M, Strid L (1984b) Iron-rich particles in European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.). Comp Biochem Physiol 79A:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudspeth AJ (1983) Mechanoelectrical transduction by haircells in the acousticolateralis sensory system. Annu Rev Neurosci 6:187–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn AJ (1981) Biophysics of geomagnetic field detection. IEEE Trans Mag 17:1113–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL (1979) PhD Thesis. Princeton University. Xerox Univ Microfilms Internat, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL (1981) The horizontal magnetic dance of the honeybee is compatible with a single-domain ferromagnetic magnetoreceptor. Biosystems 14:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL (1983) Biogenic ferrimagnetism: A new biomagnetism. In: Williamson SJ, Romani G-L, Kaufman L, Modena I (eds) Biomagnetism: An interdisciplinary approach. NATO Adv Study Inst Ser, Plenum Publ Corp, New York, pp 501–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL, Gould JL (1981). Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals. Biosystems 13:181–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL, Walker MM (in press) Particle-size considerations for magnetite-based magnetoreceptors. In: Kirschvink JL, Jones DS, MacFadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in living organisms: A new biomagnetism. Plenum Publ Corp, New York

  • Lindauer M, Martin H (1972) Magnetic effect on dancing bees. In: Galler SR, Schmidt-Koenig K, Jacobs GJ, Belleville RE (eds) Animal orientation and navigation. Nat Aeronaut Space Adminstr, Special Publ 262, Washington DC USA

  • Lins De Barros HGP, Esquivel DMS, Danon J, De Oliveira LPH (1981) Magnetotactic algae. Acad Brasileria Notas de Fisica CBPF-NF-48

  • Mather JG, Baker RR (1981) Magnetic sense of direction in woodmice for route-based navigation. Nature 291:152–155

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny MW (1973) Paleomagnetism and plate tectonics. Cambridge Univ Press, London New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry A, Bauer GB, Dizon AE (in press) Magnetoreception and biomineralization of magnetite in amphibians and reptiles. In: Kirschvink JL, Jones DS, MacFadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in living organisms: A new biomagnetism. Plenum Publ Corp, New York

  • Presti D, Pettigrew JD (1980) Ferromagnetic coupling to muscle receptors as a basis for geomagnetic field sensitivity in animals. Nature 285:99–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP (1980) Evidence for celestial and magnetic compass orientation in lake-migrating sockeye salmon fry. J Comp Physiol 137:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Brannon EL (1982) The use of celestial and magnetic cues by orienting sockeye salmon smolts. J Comp Physiol 147:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Merrill RT, Brannon EL (1981) Magnetic field detection in sockeye salmon. J Exp Zool 217:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Towe KM, Moench TT (1981) Electron-optical characterization of bacterial magnetite. Earth Planet Sci Letters 52:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilches-Troya J, Dunn RF, O'Leary DP (1984) Relationship of the vestibular hair cells to magnetic particles in the otolith of the guitarfish sacculus. J Comp Neurol 226:489–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott C (1980) Magnetic orientation in homing pigeons. IEEE Trans Magn 16:1008–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott C, Green RP (1974) Orientation of homing pigeons altered by a change in the direction of an applied magnetic field. Science 184:180–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott C, Gould JL, Kirschvink JL (1979) Pigeons have magnets. Science 205:1027–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM (1984) Learned magnetic field discrimination in yellowfin tuna,Thunnus albacares. J Comp Physiol A 155:673–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Kirschvink JL, Chang RS-B, Dizon AE (1984) A candidate magnetoreceptor organ in the yellowfin tuna,Thunnus albacares. Science 224:751–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Perry A, Dizon AE, Kirschvink JL (in press) Detection, extraction, and characterization of biogenic magnetite. In: Kirschvink JL, Jones DS, MacFadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in living organisms: A new biomagnetism. Plenum Publ Corp, New York

  • Yorke ED (1979) A possible magnetic transducer in birds. J Theor Biol 77:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke ED (1981) Sensitivity of pigeons to small magnetic field variations. J Theor Biol 89:533–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeger J, Dunn J, Fuller M (1981) Magnetic material in the head of a common Pacific dolphin. Science 213:892–894

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 91125, Pasadena, California, USA

    J. L. Kirschvink, S. -B. Chang & K. A. Peterson

  2. Southwest Fisheries Center Honolulu Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Box 3830, 96812, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

    M. M. Walker

  3. Southwest Fisheries Center La Jolla Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, P.O. Box 271, 92038, La Jolla, California, USA

    A. E. Dizon

Authors
  1. J. L. Kirschvink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. M. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. -B. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. E. Dizon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. A. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirschvink, J.L., Walker, M.M., Chang, S.B. et al. Chains of single-domain magnetite particles in chinook salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha . J. Comp. Physiol. 157, 375–381 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00618127

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00618127

Keywords

Search

Navigation