Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 363–373 | Cite as

Crayfish antennae as tactile organs: their mobility and the responses of their proprioceptors to displacement

  • D. C. Sandeman
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The crayfishCherax destructor can direct the tips of its second antennae to any point in a large solid angle covering the area in front, above, behind and to the side of its body.

     
  2. 2.

    The articulations at three joints are important for the mobility of the antennae: the carpopodite/flagellar (C/F) joint, the meropodite/carpopodite (M/C) joint, and the ischiopodite/meropodite (I/M) joint.

     
  3. 3.

    During active movement the M/C and C/F joints articulate synchronously and about the same plane. Together these two joints allow the tip of the flagellum to be swept through nearly 180° from in front of the animal to behind it.

     
  4. 4.

    The I/M joint allows the distal segments to be rotated by about 160° around the long axis of the antenna.

     
  5. 5.

    Two chordotonal organs monitor the movements of the antenna about its transverse and longitudinal axes: the distal organ measures the displacement of the M/C and C/F joints; the proximal organ that of the I/M joint.

     
  6. 6.

    Extracellular recordings from the nerve bundles of the two chordotonal organs during displacement of the individual joints revealed a range of receptor types: Smaller amplitude units have higher tonic discharge rates than larger units. All units recorded were directionally selective, and responded during movement of the joint. Some units coded the change in joint position as well as the displacement velocity, others coded only the displacement velocity.

     
  7. 7.

    Position sensitive units changed their tonic discharge frequency by a factor of about 2 in response to a maintained change in joint position from fully flexed to fully extended or vice versa, depending on their directional properties.

     
  8. 8.

    Velocity sensitive units covered a wider range, their frequency of discharge typically changing from about 40 to 160 Hz for constant angular velocities between 25 and 200°/s. The discharge frequency of pure velocity detectors increased linearly in relation to the logarithmic change in displacement velocity, over the range tested.

     
  9. 9.

    It is proposed that the chordotonal organs and the mechanoreceptors on the flagellum together constitute the receptive input for an active touch system, capable not only of detecting the presence, but also the shape of objects in their vicinity.

     

Keywords

Joint Position Discharge Frequency Constant Angular Velocity Nerve Bundle Displacement Velocity 

Abbreviations

C/F joint

carpopodite/flagellar joint

M/C joint

meropodite/carpopodite joint

I/M joint

ischiopodite/meropodite joint

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alverdes F (1930) Tierpsychologische Analyse der intracentralen Vorgänge, welche bei decapoden Krebsen die locomotorischen Reaktionen auf Helligkeit und Dunkelheit bestimmen. Z Wiss Zool 137:403–475Google Scholar
  2. Bovbjerg RV (1956) Some factors affecting aggressive behaviour in crayfish. Physiol Zool 29:127–136Google Scholar
  3. Bush BMH, Laverack MS (1982) Mechanoreception. In: Atwood HL, Sandeman DC (eds) The biology of the Crustacea, vol 3. Neurobiology: structure and function, pp 427–429. Academic Press, New York LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender M, Gnatzy W, Tautz J (1984) The antennal feathered hairs in the crayfish: A non-innervated stimulus transmitting system. J Comp Physiol 154:45–47Google Scholar
  5. Cohen MJ, Dijkgraaf S (1961) Mechanoreception. In: Waterman TH (ed) The Physiology of Crustacea, pp 65–108. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarac F, Vedel J-P (1975) Neurophysiological study of the antennal motor patterns in the rock lobsterPalinurus vulgaris. I. Reflex modulation of extensor and flexor motoneuron activities. J Comp Physiol 102:201–221Google Scholar
  7. Gilhousen HC (1927) The use of vision and of the antennae in the learning of crayfish. Univ Calif Publ Physiol 7:73–89Google Scholar
  8. Habig C, Taylor RC (1982a) The crayfish second antennae. I. Muscles, innervation patterns and movements of antennal segments. Comp Biochem Physiol 72A: 339–347Google Scholar
  9. Habig C, Taylor RC (1982b) The crayfish second antennae. II. Motoneuron structure as revealed by cobalt chloride backfilling. Comp Biochem Physiol 72A: 349–358Google Scholar
  10. Hanström B (1925) The olfactory centers in crustaceans. J Comp Neurol 38:221–250Google Scholar
  11. Hartman HB, Austin WD (1972) Proprioceptor organs in the antennae of decapod Crustacea. J Comp Physiol 81:187–202Google Scholar
  12. Herrnkind W (1969) Queuing behavior of spiny lobsters. Science 164:1425–1427Google Scholar
  13. Keim W (1914) Das Nervensystem vonAstacus fluviatilis. Z Wiss Zool 32:485–540Google Scholar
  14. Masters WM, Aicher B, Tautz J, Markl H (1982) A new type of water vibration receptor on the crayfish antenna. II. Model of receptor function. J Comp Physiol 149:409–422Google Scholar
  15. Rossi C, Vedel J-P (1980) Encoding of the angular position of the two distal joints of the spiny lobster antennae by a single mechanoreceptor. Neurosci Lett 18:301–308Google Scholar
  16. Rossi-Durand C, Vedel J-P (1981) Antennal proprioception in the rock lobsterPalinurus vulgaris: Anatomy and physiology of a bi-articular chordotonal organ. J Comp Physiol 145:505–516Google Scholar
  17. Sandeman DC, Luff SE (1973) The structural organization of glomerular neuropile in the olfactory and accessory lobes of an Australian freshwater crayfish,Cherax destructor. Z Zellforsch 142:37–61Google Scholar
  18. Sandeman DC, Sandeman RE (1984) Crayfish antennae — a sophisticated tactile sensory system. Proc Aust Physiol Pharmacol Soc 15:194PGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandeman DC, Wilkens LA (1983) Motor control of movements of the antennal flagellum in the Australian crayfish,Euastacus armatus. J Exp Biol 105:253–273Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt W (1915) Die Muskulatur vonAstacus fluviatilis (Potamobius astacus L.). Z Wiss Zool 113:165–251Google Scholar
  21. Sigvardt KA (1977) Sensory-motor interactions in antennal reflexes of the American lobster. J Comp Physiol 118:195–214Google Scholar
  22. Solon MH, Cobb JS (1980) Antennae-whipping behavior in the American lobster,Homarus americanus (Milne Edwards). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 48:217–224Google Scholar
  23. Tautz J, Masters WM, Aicher B, Markl H (1981) A new type of water vibration receptor on the crayfish antenna. I. Sensory physiology. J Comp Physiol 144:533–541Google Scholar
  24. Tautz J, Müller-Tautz R (1983) Antennal neuropile in the brain of the crayfish: Morphology of neurons. J Comp Neurol 218:415–425Google Scholar
  25. Taylor RC (1975) Physical and physiological properties of the crayfish antennal flagellum. J Neurobiol 6:501–519Google Scholar
  26. van Harreveld A (1936) A physiological solution for freshwater crustaceans. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 34:428–432Google Scholar
  27. Vedel J-P (1980) The antennal motor system of the rock lobster: competitive occurrence of resistance and assistance reflex patterns originating from the same proprioceptor. J Exp Biol 87:1–22Google Scholar
  28. Vedel J-P, Monnier S (1983) A new muscle receptor organ in the antenna of the rock lobsterPalinurus vulgaris: mechanical, muscular and proprioceptive organization of the two proximal joints J0 and J1. Proc R Soc Lond B 218:95–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. C. Sandeman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ZoologyUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations