Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 109–113 | Cite as

Effect of cyclic cooling to low temperatures on the adhesive strength of fiber-thermoplastic matrix joints

  • Yu. A. Gorbatkina
  • Z. P. Sulyaeva
Article

Abstract

The adhesive strength τ of the interface between the polyarylene sulfone PSK-1 and a steel wire 150 mm in diameter was measured using a pull-out technique after cyclic cooling of the joints from room temperature down to liquid nitrogen temperature. All specimens were prepared under isothermal conditions (300 °C, 30 min) without applying pressure. The number of cycles N of plunging in liquid nitrogen reached 900. All measurements were taken at room temperature with constant loading rate. The joint areas S were varied within a wide range. It was found that ten cooling cycles do not cause any appreciable change in the values of τ (Figs. 1–3). After 100 cooling cycles, the adhesive strength losses reached 30–45% (Figs. 1–3). After 810 cycles, the fiber-matrix interface is almost totally destroyed (Fig. 1). As the number of cycles N increases, the character of the dependence of the adhesive strength τ on the joint area changes: when N < 100, the values of τ are reduced as the interfacial surface area increases; when N = 810, the adhesive strength does not depend on S. The main factor that governs the reduction in adhesive strength is assumed to be residual thermal stresses. Analysis of the data obtained here and earlier shows that the behavior of polymer-fiber systems after cyclic cooling down to low temperatures is the same for both network and linear polymer matrices. The origin of this behavior also seems to be the same for all polymer-fiber adhesive joints.

Keywords

Thermal Stress Adhesive Strength Steel Wire Polymer Matrice Liquid Nitrogen Temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. A. Gorbatkina, Adhesive Strength in Polymer-Fiber Systems [in Russian], Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. A. Gobatkina, Adhesive Strength of Fiber-Polymer Systems, Ellis Horwood, London-New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Kvlividze, Yu. A. Gorbatkina, V. G. Ivanova-Mumzhieva, A. M. Kuperman, and N. K. Shaidurova, “Strength of unidirectional epoxide composites and the fiber-matrix interface upon cyclic cooling to low temperatures,” Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, No. 3, 387–394 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. V. Korneeva, Yu. A. Gorbatkina, V. I. Nedel'kin, S. I. Ovsyannikova, O. B. Andrianova, and V. A. Sergeev, “Investigation of adhesion of sulfur-containing polyarylenes,” Vysokomolek. Soedin., Ser. A,35, No. 1, 58–62 (1993) (Polymer Sci., Ser. A,35, No. 1, 46–49 (1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Gaur and B. Miller, “Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface: evaluation of experimental parameters,” Composites Sci. Technology, 35–51 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. A. Gorbatkina
    • 1
  • Z. P. Sulyaeva
    • 1
  1. 1.N. N. Semenov Institute of Chemical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations