Skip to main content
Log in

Insect hearing in the field

III. Masking by noise

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Hemisaga denticulata andMygalopsis marki are two sympatrically occurring species of bushcricket. Both also have almost complete overlap in their song frequencies (Fig. 2). However, the temporal pattern of their respective songs differs considerably, males ofM. marki sing continuously compared with short bursts of song produced by males ofH. denticulata. A comparative study between two populations ofH. denticulata showed that in the presence of singing males ofM. marki, the song ofH. denticulata was suppressed (Fig. 5, Table 1). Furthermore, song interference was also demonstrated neurophysiologically in the field using the response of the omega-neuron as a ‘biological microphone’ (Fig. 4).

  2. 2.

    In aggregations ofH. denticulata males alternate their chirp pattern, and this behaviour was used as an assay in the laboratory to test the susceptibility of intraspecific communication to biological noise. It was concluded that the precise alternating pattern between two males is significantly affected by noise (Fig. 6).

  3. 3.

    Neurophysiological experiments performed in the laboratory revealed a strong masking effect by biological noise on the perception of the conspecific signal within the afferent auditory pathway (Figs. 7, 8). This experiment when conducted in the field exhibited similar masked responses in the omega-neuron (Figs. 9, 10).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey WJ, Morris GK (1986) Confusion of phonotaxis by masking sounds in the bushcricketConocephalus brevipennis (Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae). Ethology 73:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ, Robinson D (1971) Song as a possible isolating mechanism in the genusHomorocoryphus (Tettigonioidea, Orthoptera). Anim Behav 19:390–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ, Thiele DR (1983) Male spacing behaviour in the Tettigoniidae: an experimental approach. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA (1982) The active space of red-winged blackbird song. J Comp Physiol 147:511–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadour IR (in press) Temporal pattern changes in the calling song of the bushcricket Mygalopsis marki Bailey in response to conspecific song (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Insect Behav

  • Dadour IR, Bailey WJ (1985) Male agonistic behaviour of the bushcricketMygalopsis marki Bailey in response to conspecific song (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Z Tierpsychol 70:320–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficken RW, Ficken MS, Hailman JP (1974) Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest TG (1983) Calling songs and mate choice in male crickets. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (in press) Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids (Neoconocephalus): inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. Animal Behav 36:684–695

  • Hill KG, Loftus-Hills JJ, Gartside DF (1972) Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field cricketsTeleogryllus commodus andT. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust J Zool 20:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmring K (1975) The afferent auditory pathway in the ventral cord ofLocusta migratoria (Acrididae). II. Responses of the auditory ventral cord neurons to natural sounds. J Comp Physiol 104:143–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmring K, Lewis DB, Eichendorf A (1978) The physiological characteristics of the primary sensory neurons of the complex tibial organ ofDecticus verrucivorus L. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol 127:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer W (1981) Acoustic competition in bush crickets. Ecol Entomol 6:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer W, Broughton WB (1984) Acoustic interference in bush crickets; a factor in the evolution of singing insects? J Nat Hist 8:599–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn MJ, Martin AA (1969) Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Anim Behav 17:785–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Meixner AJ (1976) Acoustical behaviour and spacing in the Nebraska coneheadNeoconocephalus nebrascensis (Bruner) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). PhD thesis. Iowa State University, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM (1982) Behavioral refractory period in neotropical treefrogs. J Comp Physiol 148:337–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield BP (1983) Central projections of primary auditory fibres in Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera). J Comp Physiol 151:389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield BP, Hill KG (1983) The physiology of ascending auditory interneurons in the tettigoniidCaedicia simplex (Orthoptera: Ensifera): response properties and a model of integration in the afferent auditory pathway. J Comp Physiol 152:495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J (1975) Transmission of acoustic information at three neuronal levels in the auditory system ofDecticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol 97:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Kalmring K (1973) Die afferente Hörbahn im Bereich des Zentralnervensystems vonDecticus verrucivorus (Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol 85:361–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1980) Bilateral coding of sound direction in the CNS of the bushcricketTettigonia viridissima L. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol 140:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1986) Insect hearing in the field. I. The use of identified nerve cells as biological microphones. J Comp Physiol A 158:647–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Kalmring K, Popov AV, Rehbein HG (1976) Brain projections and information processing of biologically significant sounds by two large ventral-cord neurons ofGryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 110:251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H (1985) Anatomical representation of frequency and intensity in the auditory system of Orthoptera. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Bailey WJ (1986) Insect hearing in the field. II. Male spacing behaviour and correlated acoustic cues in the bushcricketMygalopsis marki. J Comp Physiol A 159:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Marquart V, Hardt M (1988) The organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of Orthoptera. J Comp Neurol 275:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1977) Bushcricket interspecific acoustic interactions in the field (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). J Nat Hist 11:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Broughton WB (1976) Song modification in the Orthoptera. II Types of acoustic interaction betweenPlatycleis intermedia and other species of the genus (Tettigoniidae). Physiol Entomol 1:287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983) The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog,Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologia 39:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon G (1972) Sense of place. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele DR, Bailey WJ (1980) The function of sound in male spacing behaviour in bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). Aust J Ecol 5:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulagaraj SM, Walker TJ (1973) Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female calling songs. Science 182:1278–1279

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker TJ (1957) Specificity in the response of female tree crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae) to calling songs of the males. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:626–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky MD (1972) Specificity of the calling song and short term changes in the phonotactic response by female cricketsScapsipidus marginatus (Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 79:153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhantiev RD (1971) Frequency characteristics of tympanal organs in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Zool Zh 50:507–514

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Römer, H., Bailey, W. & Dadour, I. Insect hearing in the field. J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 609–620 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00614503

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00614503

Keywords

Navigation