Skip to main content
Log in

Unwanted symptoms in depressed patients treated with viloxazine: An algorithm for identification of illness-related symptoms

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ninety-six depressed outpatients from 5 centres were given viloxazine 200–400 mg/day. The treatment produced significant clinical improvement as evaluated by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Thirteen patients dropped-out because of possible side effects. Many untoward symptoms were described by all the patients. To distinguish between illness-related symptoms (IRSs) and potential side effect symptoms (SESs) a new approach was taken, using an algorithm that provides a decision strategy based on the time course both of the symptom and the illness. By this procedure, 90 of the 187 claimed untoward symptoms were identified as IRSs. Of the 97 potential SESs, only 36 were spontaneously volunteered, and the remaining 61 symptoms were elicited on specific questioning. Whenever possible, volunteered potential SESs were assessed to determine the relationship between the drug treatment and the adverse reaction. It was found that only a few instances of gastric disturbance and exacerbation of anxiety were probably violxazine-related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin MM, Pecknold JC (1978) Nomifensin in the treatment of depression: a standard-controlled clinical study. Psychopharmacol Bull 14: 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ananth J, Van Den Steen N (1978) A double-blind controlled comparative study of nomifensine in depression. Curr Ther Res 23: 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Åsberg M, Cronholm B, Sjöqvist F, Tuck D (1970) Correlation of subjective side effects with plasma concentrations of nortriptyline. Br Med J 4: 18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen A, Ghose K, Montgomery S, Rama Rao VA, Christiansen J, Mikkleson PL, Van Praag HM, Van de Poel F, Minsker EJ, Kozulja VG, Matussek N, Kungkunz G, Jørgensen A (1978) Amitriptyline plasma-concentration and clinical effect. Lancet 1: 63–64

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde J (1977) Double-blind controlled trial of viloxazine hydrochloride and imipramine hydrochloride in the treatment of hospital depressed patients. Acta Ther 3: 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald JF (1977) A comparison of high and low dosage regimes of maprotiline (Ludiomil). J Int Med Res 5 [Suppl 4]: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekdawi MY (1971) Dibenzepin and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression. Br J Psychiatr 118: 523–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanueli A, Sacchetti G (1980) An algorithm for the classification of untoward events in large scale clinical trials. Agents Actions [Suppl, Vol 7] Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding JM (1969) A double-blind comparative trial of dibenzepin and imipramine. Med J Aust 1: 614–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Floru L, Czarny G, Tegeler J (1976) Double-blind study with the novel antidepressant viloxazine versus imipramine in 50 in-patients. Arzneim Forsch 26: 1170–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Rojo R (1976) Controlled double-blind study of viloxazine and imipramine in depression. Hosp Gen 16: 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermann W (1977) A review of controlled studies with nomifensine, performed outside the UK. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 237S-241S

    Google Scholar 

  • Karch FE, Lasagna L (1977) Towards the operational identification of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 21: 247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiloh LG, Bartrop RW, Franklin JA, Neilson MD (1979) A double-blind comparative trial of viloxazine and amitriptyline in patients suffering from endogenous depression. Aust NZ J Psychiatr 13: 357–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer MS, Leventhal JM, Hutchinson TA, Feinstein AR (1979) An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. J Am Med Assoc 242: 623–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew RJ, Weinman M, Claghorn JL (1980) Tricyclic side effects without tricyclics in depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 16: 58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland HA, Kerr TA, Little JC (1977) A clinical comparison of nomifensine and amitriptyline. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 233S-236S

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillin WP (1977) A comparison of maprotiline (Ludiomil) and slow release amitriptyline (Tryptizol SR). J Int Med Res 5 [Suppl 4]: 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JE (1977) A comparison of Ludiomil, Tryptizol and Lentizol. J Int Med Res 5 [Suppl 4]: 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JE, Bridgman KM (1978) A comparative clinical trial of mianserin (Norval) and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression in general practice. J Int Med Res 6: 199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder RM, Brodgen RN, Speight TM, Avery GS (1977) Viloxazine: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs 13: 401–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöldinger W, Gammel G (1978) Differences in effect between nomifensine and nortriptyline. Int Pharmacopsychiatr 13: 58–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsegos IK, Ekdawi MY (1974) A double-blind controlled study of viloxazine and imipramine in depression. Curr Med Res Opin 2: 455–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman D (1977) The treatment of depression comparing divided and single doses of maprotiline (Ludiomil). J Int Med Res 5 [Suppl 4]: 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler VE, Taylor JR, Wetzel RD, Biggs JT (1978) Nortriptyline plasma levels and subjective side effects. Br J Psychiatr 132: 55–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maistrello, I., Grassi, G., Bertolino, A. et al. Unwanted symptoms in depressed patients treated with viloxazine: An algorithm for identification of illness-related symptoms. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24, 277–281 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613832

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613832

Key words

Navigation