Summary
A naturalistic study was set up to screen, identify and treat hypertensive patients aged 20–60 years in a rural general practice. 3,222 patients (92%) of a stable population of 3,489 were screened by 2 nurse research assistants and of these 455 patients (14%) were found to be hypertensive or borderline hypertensive. After careful assessment, 192 of these patients were found suitable for treatment and subsequently 138 entered the study. Two well recognised treatment regimes were used and no significant difference between patient response resulted. 84 patients (60.9%) completed the 2 year duration of the study discussed here. The cost of the study is not feasible in an average general practice, but day to day running of such a project, run along clearly defined treatment regimes was managed easily by 2 research assistants: this reduced, therefore, the work load on individual general practitoners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lasagna L (1974) A Plea for the “Naturalistic” Study of Medicine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 7: 153
Liljestrand A (1980) Significance of Controlled Clinical Trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 18: 290–211
Report on the Sixth European Symposium on Clinical Pharmacological Evaluation in Drug Control, Deidesheim, November 1977 (1978). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 13: 73–80
Dollery CT (1979) A Bleak Outlook for Placebos (and for Science). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15: 219–221
Lasagna L (1979) Placebos and Controlled Trials Under Attack. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15: 373–374
Fell PJ, Watson NP, O'Donnell HF (1978) Post Marketing Drug Surveillance, Another String to the Bow. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 13: 315–316
Tudor Hart J (1970) Semicontinuous Screening of a Whole Community for Hypertension. Lancet 2: 223–226
Barber JH (1979) Blood Pressure Screening and Supervision in General Practice. Br Med J 1: 843–846
Veterans Administration Co-operative Study Group on Anti-hypertensive Agents: Effects of Treatment on Morbidity in Hypertension (1967). J Am Med Assoc 202: 1028–1034
Zacharias FJ (1971) Propranolol in Hypertension: a 5-year Study. Postgrad Med J 47 [Suppl]: 75–79
Prichard BNC, Gillam PMS (1964) The Use of Propranolol in the Treatment of Hypertension. Br Med J 2: 725–730
Conway J, Lawers P (1960) Hemodynamic and Hypotensive Effects of Long Term Therapy with Chlorothiazide. Circulation 21: 21–27
Birdwood GFB, Wink CAS (eds) (1978) Modern Aspects of Beta-Blocker Therapy: Report of an International Clinical Symposium, 1978, Ciba-Geigy Ltd, pp 123–136
Hayes J (ed) (1974) Proceedings of Cardiology Conference, Gothenburg-Sweden, 1974. Astra Chemicals Ltd, pp 101–115
Kubik M, Kendall M, Ebbutt A, John V (1979) Metoprolol with and without Chlorthalidone in Hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Therap: 23–25
Forrest WA (1979) Efficacy of a Combination of Diuretic, Beta-Blocker and Vasodilator in the Treatment of Hypertension in General Practice. Br J Clin Pract pp 326
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fell, P.J., Shakespeare, J.M., Watson, N.P. et al. A naturalistic study of hypertension in a rural U.K. community. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24, 191–197 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613816
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613816