Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 121, Issue 3, pp 307–324 | Cite as

Responses of giant interneurons of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana to wind puffs of different directions and velocities

  • Joanne Westin
  • Jonathan J. Langberg
  • Jeffrey M. Camhi
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Controlled wind puffs of different directions and velocities were delivered to the cerci of cockroaches (Periplaneta americana), while the responses of individually identifiable giant interneurons (GI's) were recorded intracellularly.

     
  2. 2.

    All fourteen histologically identified GI's (seven bilateral pairs) respond with a burst of action potentials to wind from some or all directions. The directional sensitivity of a given GI is consistent from animal to animal (Fig. 7).

     
  3. 3.

    Varying the angle of delivery of wind puffs revealed that, in each side of the nerve cord, two GI's (2, 4) show little or no directional selectivity, two GI's (1, 7) have a greater response to wind from the ipsilateral side, two GI's (3, 6) respond primarily to wind from in front of the animal, and one GI (5) responds primarily to wind from the ipsilateral rear quadrant (Fig. 7). These directional properties are independent of wind velocity up to at least 2.6 m/s (Fig. 8).

     
  4. 4.

    Varying the peak velocity of the wind stimuli (delivered from each GI's maximal response angle) showed that the number of action potentials evoked increases with wind velocity up to at least 2.6 m/s for some GI's (1, 5, 6, 7), while the number does not increase with velocity beyond 0.5 m/s for others (2, 3, 4) (Fig. 9).

     
  5. 5.

    Covering or removing the cercus contralateral to a given GI reduced the response of each GI without appreciably altering its directional selectivity (Fig. 11 A). Eliminating the ipsilateral cercus also moderately reduced the responses of some GI's (4, 5, 7), but nearly or completely abolished responses in others (GI's 1, 2, 3, 6) (Fig. 11B).

     
  6. 6.

    The spike frequencies of the GI's in response to “standard wind puffs” (peak velocity 0.6 m/s or 2.6 m/s) are high, with maintained frequencies often over 300 spikes per s (Table 1), and instantaneous frequencies some times over 900 per s (Fig. 10).

     
  7. 7.

    The directional selectivity, high spike frequency, and rapid conduction velocity of the GI's may be adaptations for mediating the short latency, directional evasive behavior of the cockroach. The results are discussed in terms of the presumed role of the GI's in this behavior and implications for sensory integration.

     

Keywords

Wind Velocity Peak Velocity Instantaneous Frequency Nerve Cord Sensory Integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Callec, J.: Synaptic transmission in the central nervous system of insects. In: Insect neurobiology (ed. J. Treherne),pp. 120–185. New York: American Elsevier 1974Google Scholar
  2. Callec, J.J., Guillet, J.C., Pichon, Y., Boistel, J.: Further studies on synaptic transmission in insects. II. Relations between sensory information and its synaptic integration at the level of a single giant axon in the cockroach. J. exp. Biol.55, 123–149 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Callec, J.J., Sattelle, D.B.: A simple technique for monitoring the synaptic actions of pharmacological agents. J. exp. Biol.59, 725–738 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Camhi, J.M.: Non-rhythmic sensory inputs: influence on locomotory outputs in arthropods. In: Neural control of locomotion (eds. R.M. Herman, S. Grillner, P.S.G. Stein, D.G. Stuart), pp. 561–586. New York and London: Plenum Press 1976Google Scholar
  5. Counter, A.: An electrophysiological study of sound sensitive neurons in the “primitive ear” ofAcheta domesticus. J. Insect Physiol.22, 1–8 (1976)Google Scholar
  6. Dagan, D., Parnas, I.: Giant fibre and small fibre pathways involved in the evasive response of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J. exp. Biol.52, 313–324 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J.S., Palka, J.: The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket,Acheta domesticus. Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. B185, 83–103 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Farley, R.D., Milburn, N.S.: Structure and function of the giant fiber system in the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J. Insect Physiol.15, 457–476 (1969)Google Scholar
  9. Feng, A.S., Gerhardt, H.C., Capranica, R.R.: Sound localization behavior of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) and the barking treefrog (H. gratiosa). J. comp. Physiol.107, 241–252 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Gnatzy, W.: The ultrastructure of the thread-hairs on the cerci of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana L.: The intermoult phase. J. Ultrastruct. Res.54, 124–134 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Harris, C.L., Smyth, T.: Structural details of cockroach giant axons revealed by injected dye. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.40A, 295–303 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Iles, J.F.: Structure and synaptic activation of the fast coxal depressor motoneurone of the cockroach,Periplaneta americana. J. exp. Biol.56, 647–656 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. Langberg, J.J., Westin, J., Camhi, J.M.: Response of cockroach giant fibers to wind from different directions. Neurose. Abstr.2, 329 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. Markl, H., Tautz, J.: The sensitivity of hair receptors in caterpillars ofBarathra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to particle movement in a sound field. J. comp. Physiol.99, 79–87 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. Matsumoto, S.G., Murphey, R.K.: The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets. IV. Patterns of connectivity between receptors and the medial giant interneuron. J. comp. Physiol.119, 319–330 (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Murphey, R.K., Zaretsky, M.D.: Orientation to calling song by female cricketsScapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J. exp. Biol.56, 335–352 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Nicklaus, R.: Die Erregung einzelner Fadenhaare vonPeriplaneta americana in Abhängigkeit von der Größe und Richtung der Auslenkung. Z. vergl. Physiol.50, 331–362 (1965)Google Scholar
  18. Palka, J., Olberg, R.: The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets. III. Receptive field organization. J. comp. Physiol.119, 301–317 (1977)Google Scholar
  19. Parnas, I., Dagan, D.: Functional organizations of giant axons in the central nervous system of insects: New aspects. Advanc. Insect Physiol.9, 95–143 (1971)Google Scholar
  20. Pumphrey, R.J., Rawdon-Smith, A.F.: Synaptic transmission of nervous impulses through the last abdominal ganglion of the cockroach. Proc. roy. Soc. B122, 106–118 (1937)Google Scholar
  21. Ritzmann, R.E., Camhi, J.M.: Responses of leg motor neurons to electrical stimulation of giant axons in the cockroach,Periplaneta americana. Neurose. Abstr.2, 333 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Roeder, K.D.: Organization of the ascending giant fiber system of the cockroach (Periplaneta americana). J. exp. Zool.108, 243–261 (1948)Google Scholar
  23. Spira, M.E., Parnas, I., Bergman, F.: Organization of the giant axons of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. J. exp. Biol.50, 615–627 (1969)Google Scholar
  24. Spira, M.E., Yarom, Y., Parnas, I.: Modulation of spike frequency by regions of special axonal geometry and by synaptic inputs. J. Neurophysiol.39, 882–899 (1976)Google Scholar
  25. Vennard, J.K., Street, R.L.: Elementary fluid mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1975Google Scholar
  26. Whitfield, I.C.: The auditory pathway. London: Edward Arnold Ltd. 1967Google Scholar
  27. Wiese, K.: Mechanoreceptors for near-field water displacements in crayfish. J. Neurophyiol.39, 816–833 (1976)Google Scholar
  28. Wiese, K., Calabrese, R.L., Kennedy, D.: Integration of directional mechanosensory input by crayfish interneurons. J. Neurophysiol.39, 834–843 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Westin
    • 1
  • Jonathan J. Langberg
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Camhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations