Skip to main content
Log in

Osmotropotaxis inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Drosophila melanogaster is able to perform osmotropotaxis under open-loop conditions. With an ‘optimal’ stimulus the average turning tendency to the side of higher concentration corresponds to a circular track with radiusr=0.8 cm. The response amplitude does not decrease within 1 or 2 h. Unilaterally antennectomized flies in an homogeneous odor field show a permanent turning tendency towards their intact side.

The smallest concentration ratio to elicit osmotropotaxis in normal flies ranges between 6∶10 and 9∶10 at high and between 2∶10 and 5∶10 at an about 50 times lower odor intensity. No negative tropotaxis (i.e. turning to the side of lower concentration) is observed, even with strong repellents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aceves-Piña EO, Quinn WG (1979) Learning in normal and mutantDrosophila larvae. Science 206:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 24:85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y (1977) Properties of learning and memory inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 114:69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y, Yan Y-N, Byers D, Quinn WG, Benzer S (1976) Dunce, a mutant ofDrosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:1684–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman G, Berglund B, Berglund U, Lindvall T (1967) Perceived intensity of odor as a function of time of adaptation. Scand J Psychol 8:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen T (1971) Olfactory psychophysics. In: Beidler LM (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 4. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 216–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach KF (1979) Influence of homogeneously applied olfactory stimuli on phototaxis ofDrosophila melanogaster. In: Gilles R (ed) Animals and environmental fitness (Abstracts). Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Sydney Paris Frankfurt, pp 91–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Flügge Ch (1934) Geruchliche Raumorientierung vonDrosophila melanogaster. Z Vergl Physiol 20:463–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (1979) Properties of olfactory conditioning in the housefly,Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol 25:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1975) Hirnforschung am Navigationssystem der Fliegen. Naturwissenschaften 62:468–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG, Wenking H (1973) Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitflyDrosophila. J Comp Physiol 85:235–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Hangartner W (1967) Spezifität und Inaktivierung des Spurphero- mons vonLasius fuliginosus Latr. und Orientierung der Arbeiterinnen im Duftfeld. Z Vergl Physiol 57:103–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M (1980) Mutants of brain structure and function: what is the significance of the mushroom bodies for behavior? In: Siddiqi O, Babu P, Hall LM, Hall J (eds) Development and Biology ofDrosophila. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 373–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellog FE, Frizel DE, Wright RH (1962) The olfactory guidance of flying insects. 4.Drosophila. Can Entomol 94:884–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi T (1973) Genetic alteration of olfactory functions inDrosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Gen 48:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn A (1919) Die Orientierung der Tiere im Raum. Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer E (1976) The orientation of walking honey-bees in odour fields with small concentration gradients. Physiol Entomol 1:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Lob J (1913) Die Tropismen. In: Winterstein H (ed) Handbuch der vergleichenden Physiologie, Bd 4. Fischer, Jena, pp 451–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin H (1965) Osmotropotaxis in the honey-bee. Nature 208:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuhr T, Menzel R (1972) Learning experiments on the use of side-specific information in the olfactory and visual system in the honey-bee (Apis melliferd). In: Wehner R (ed) Information processing in the visual system of arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto E (1951) Untersuchungen zur Frage der geruchlichen Orientierung bei Insekten. Zool Jahrb Allg Zool Physiol 62:65–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiss R (1980) Anemotaxis im Lauf und Flug beim Schwammspinner. Versuche zur Aufklärung des Wirkungsgefüges. Doctoral thesis, L.M. Universität, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn WG, Harris WA, Benzer S (1974) Conditioned behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:708–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues V, Siddiqi O (1978) Genetic analysis of chemosensory pathway. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 87:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöne H (1980) Orientierung im Raum. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins L, Hall J, Hall LM (1980) Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutantDrosophila. J Insect Physiol 26:689–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Traynier RMM (1968) Sex attraction in the mediterranean floor mothAnagasta kühniella: location of the female by the male. Can Entomol 100:5–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borst, A., Heisenberg, M. Osmotropotaxis inDrosophila melanogaster . J. Comp. Physiol. 147, 479–484 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612013

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612013

Keywords

Navigation