Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 99–104 | Cite as

An experimental model for determination of the elastic deformation properties of vascular transplants

  • É. S. Karvanen
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Keywords

Experimental Model Elastic Deformation Deformation Property Vascular Transplant Elastic Deformation Property 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    A. F. Dronov, S. L. Dzemeshkevich, N. V. Agureeva, M. I. Tropov, and V. E. Shestoperov, “Biomechanical studies and their significance in the evaluation of vascular substitutes in arterial plastics,” Éksp. Khirurg. Anesteziol., No. 4, 16–20 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Kas'yanov and B. A. Purinya, “New principles for the reinforcement for substitutes of individual elements of the cardiovascular system from a study of their mechanical properties and structure,” in: Abstracts of the Fifth All-Union Symposium on Synthetic Medical Polymers [in Russian], Riga (1981), pp. 67–69.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    É. S. Karvanen, “Biomechanical properties of vascular substitutes made from polytetrafluoroethylene and biological material,” in: Abstracts of the Fifth All-Union Symposium on Synthetic Medical Polymers [in Russian], Riga (1981), pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Mochizuki, “On the mechanical strength of the human blood vessels,” J. Kyoto Pref. Med. Univ.,52, 1–29 (1952).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. M. Learoyd and M. G. Taylor, “Alterations with age in the viscoelastic properties of human arterial walls,” Circulation Res.,18, No. 3, 278–292 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. D. Valtnerix, “Physical activity and age-related changes in the arterial system determined by sphygmography and pulse wave propagation velocity data,” Author's Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation, Biological Sciences;, Riga (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    É. É. Tseders and B. A. Purinya, “The mechanical properties of human blood vessels relative to their site,” Mekh. Polim., No. 2, 320–325 (1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Kas'yanov and A. F. Kregers, “Differences in the deformative and strength properties of large blood vessels relative to their site, stressing direction, and age,” Mekh. Polim., No. 4, 704–711 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. S. Khamin, “The strength properties of the human ilical and carotid arteries and their age-related changes,” Mekh. Polim., No. 5, 889–892 (1978).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu. A. Yartsev, “The mechanical properties of arotic walls: variation with age, sex, topography, and structure,” Abstracts of the Second All-Union Conference on Biomechanics [in Russian], Vol. 1, Riga (1979), pp. 166–169.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. A. Purinya, V. A. Kas'yanov, É. É. Tseders, and G. L. Vilka, “Determination of the major mechanical indices of a vascular human femoral transplant,” in: All-Union Symposium on Synthetic Medical Polymers [in Russian], Tashkent (1973), p. 61.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. A. Purinya, I. V. Knets, and V. A. Kas'yanov, “The autovenous transplant in reconstructive vascular surgery,” Mekh. Polim., No. 1, 153–159 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. A. Purinya and V. A. Kas'yanov, The Biomechanics of Large Human Blood Vessels [in Russian], Riga (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. E. Kinley and A. E. Marble, “Compliance: A continuing problem with vascular grafts,” J. Cardlovasc. Surg., No. 21, 163–170 (1980).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. V. Lebedev, L. L. Plotkin, and A. D. Smirnov, Blood Vessel Prostheses [in Russian], Leningrad (1975).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A, V. Pokrovskii, Diseases of the Aorta and Its Branches [in Russian], Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. A. Shalimov and N. F. Dryuk, Surgery on the Aorta and the Major Vessels [in Russian], Kiev (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ya. V. Volkolakov, S. N. Tkhor, and M. A. Skuin', “The kinetic evauation of biological tissues and synthetic prostheses in the reconstruction of the abdominal aorta and arteries of the lower extremity,” Mekh. Polim., No. 4, 737–739 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. N. Zyryanov, Reconstructive Surgery for Occlusion of the Femoral and Popliteal Arteries [in Russian], Tomsk (1979).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. E. Szilagyi, J. H. Hageman, R. F. Smith, J. P. Elliott, F. Brown, and P. Dietz, “Autogenous vein grafting in femoropopliteal atherosclerosis: The limit of its effectiveness,” Surgery,86, No. 6, 836–851 (1979).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. A. Purinya, V. A. Kas'yanov, and É. É. Tseders, “The large subcutaneous vein of arterial substitute,” Éksp. Khirurg. Anesteziol., No. 5, 11–15 (1975).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    É. S. Karvanen and B. A. Purinya, “Elastic deformation properties of biological transplants and arteries for an intended reconstruction zone,” Biomekhanika (Sofia), No. 14, 3–9 (1983).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    É. S. Karvanen and B. A. Purinya, “Autogeneous vein grafts and their elastic deformation properties,” Krovoobrashchenie, No. 1, 56–59 (1983).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Dardik, I. M. Ibrahim, and I. I. Dardik, “Glutaraldehyde-stabilized human umbilical cord vein as a fascular prosthesis,” in: Graft Materials in Vascular Surgery, USA (1976), pp. 279–295.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. E. Baier, C. K. Akers, J. R. Natiella, and J. Wirth, “Physicochemical properties of stabilized umbilical vein,” Vascular Surgery,14, No. 3, 145–157 (1980).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. V. Pokrovskii, B. A. Purinya, P. O. Kazanchan, V. L. Buyanovskii, D. D. Mungalov, and É. S. Karvanen, “The umbilical cord vein of the newborn as a vascular prosthesis,” Izv. Akad. Nauk Latv. SSR, No. 12, 80–87 (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    É. S. Karvanen, “The radial subcutaneous vein as an arterial prosthesis,” Klin. Khirurgiya, No. 7, 53–54 (1982).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. V. Dzemeshkevich, “Evaluation of the resistance of vascular prostheses and grafts to the atherosclerotic process. An experimental study,” Candidate's Dissertation, Medical Sciences, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. G. May, J. A. De Weese, and C. G. Rob, “Hemodynamic effects of arterial stenosis,” Surgery,53, No. 4, 513–524 (1963).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Vänttinen, “Electromagnetic measurement of the arterial blood flow in the femoropopliteal region,” Acta Chir. Scand., No. 141, 353–359 (1975).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    N. N. Savitskii, Several Methods for the Study and Functional Evaluation of the Circulatory System [in Russian], Leningrad (1956).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. D. Valtnerix, “An experimental study of the pulse wave propagation velocity,” Candidate's Dissertation, Biological Sciences, Riga (1963).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Kapo, T. Pedly, R. Shroter, and U. Sid, Circulatory Mechanics [Russian translation], Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Hallock, “Arterial elasticity in man in relation to age as evaluated by the pulse wave velocity method,” Arch. Int. Med.,54, No. 5, 770–798 (1934).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Valtneris, Asinsrites Fiziologija, Riga (1979).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. I. Karpik, “A study of the vascular system in the case of thromboobliterative disease,” Vestn. Khirurg., No. 12, 32–35 (1963).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ya. V. Skards and I. A. Silin'sh, “The regulation of the circulation to the human extremities in the normal case and upon blockage of the major arteries,” in: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Regulation of Regional Circulation [in Russian], Leningrad (1965), pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    N. A. Kristal', “Instrumental studies in the evaluation of the labor capacity of Patients with thromboobliterative damage to the arteries of the lower extremities,” Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Medical Sciences, Petrozavodsk (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • É. S. Karvanen
    • 1
  1. 1.O. V. Kuusinen Petrozavodsk State UniversityUSSR

Personalised recommendations