Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 553–563 | Cite as

A comparison of some photoreceptor characteristics in the pineal and retina

I. The Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix)
  • R. G. Foster
  • J. J. Schalken
  • A. M. Timmers
  • W. J. De Grip
Article

Summary

Immunocytochemistry with a rod-specific antiserum was used to study the post-hatch development (2 days–300 days) of photoreceptor elements within the pineal of the Japanese quail. At all ages staining was restricted to limited numbers of pinealocytes scattered throughout the gland. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with the same rod-specific antibody, was then used to obtain a quantitative measure of rod opsin in total eye and pineal extracts in both the developing retina and pineal. The opsin content of both tissues shows a marked increase during the first 30 days after hatch and then plateaued to 0.84±0.02 nmoles opsin in the eye and 2.20±0.11 pmoles opsin equivalents in the pineal. The increase in opsin in the retina may be associated with continued post-hatch development of the photoreceptors. We then attempted to demonstrate the presence of the rhodopsin chromophore within pineal and retinal extracts using HPLC analysis. In both retinal and pineal extracts, 11-cis retinaldehyde was identified and a light-induced shift from the 11-cis to the all-trans isomer was clearly shown. This analysis also allowed us to calculate the total content of 11-cis and all-trans retinaldehyde (derived from both rod and non-rod photoreceptors) of the eye and pineal (eye: 1.7±0.2 nmoles; pineal: 4.6±0.5 pmoles). In the quail eye, the total amount of retinaldehyde is more than twice the amount of rod-like opsin. This probably reflects the large contribution of cones in the quail retina; the cone pigments will contribute to the retinaldehyde content but are not recognized by the rodspecific antibodies. In the pineal, we also found more than double the concentration of retinaldehyde than we would have predicted from the amount of rod-like opsin. These results, coupled with our immunocytochemical findings, suggest that the quail pineal contains at least two classes of photoreceptor, some ‘rod-like’, others ‘non rod-like’.

Keywords

Retina Total Content Large Contribution Japanese Quail Cone Pigment 

Abbreviations

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bischoff MB (1969) Photoreceptoral and secretory structures in the avian pineal organ. J Ultrastruct Res 28:16–26Google Scholar
  2. Bowmaker JK (1977) The visual pigments, oil droplets and spectral sensitivity of the pigeon. Vision Res 17:1129–1138Google Scholar
  3. Boya J, Calvo J (1980) Ultrastructural study of the post-hatching evolution of the pineal gland of the chicken (Gallus). Acta Anat 107:143–168Google Scholar
  4. Bridges CDB (1984) Retinoids in photosensitive systems. In: Sporn MB, Roberts AB, Goodman DS (eds) The retinoids. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–176Google Scholar
  5. Collin JP (1971) Differentiation and regression of the cells of the sensory line in the epiphysis cerebri. In: Wolstenholm GEW, Knight J (eds) The pineal gland. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London, pp 79–125Google Scholar
  6. Collin JP (1979) Recent advances in pineal cytochemistry: evidence of the production of indolamines and proteinaceous substances by rudimentary photoreceptor cells and pinealocytes of amniota. In: Kapper JA, Pevet P (eds) The pineal gland of vertebrates including man. Progr Brain Res 52:271–296Google Scholar
  7. Curd MR (1968) Dilute H2O2-NH4OH; A rapid bleach for retinal melanin. Stain Technology 43:42–43Google Scholar
  8. De Grip WJ, Daemen FJM, Bonting SL (1980) Isolation and purification of bovine rhodopsin. Methods Enzymol 67:301–320Google Scholar
  9. Deguchi T (1979) Circadian rhythm of serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity in organ culture of chicken pineal gland. Science 203:1245–1247Google Scholar
  10. Deguchi T (1981) Rhodopsin-like photosensitivity of isolated chicken pineal gland. Nature 290:702–704Google Scholar
  11. Dodt E, Meissl H (1982) The pineal and parietal organs of lower vertebrates. Experientia 38:996–1000Google Scholar
  12. Ekström P, Foster RG, Korf H-W, Schalken JJ (1987) Antibodies against retinal photoreceptor-specific proteins reveal axonal projections from the photosensory pineal organ in teleosts. J Comp Neurol 265:25–33Google Scholar
  13. Foster RG, Korf H-W, Schalken JJ (1987) Immunocytochemical markers revealing retinal and pineal but not hypothalamic photoreceptor systems in the Japanese quail. Cell Tissue Res 248:161–167Google Scholar
  14. Foster RG, Timmers AM, Schalken JJ, De Grip WJ (1989) A comparison of some photoreceptor characteristics in the pineal and retina: II. The Djungarian Hamster (Phodopussungorus). J Comp Physiol 165:565–572Google Scholar
  15. Frisch K von (1911) Beiträge zur Physiologie der Pigmentzellen in der Fischhaut. Pflügers. Arch 138:319–387Google Scholar
  16. Groenendijk GWT, De Grip WJ, Daemen FJM (1979) Identification and characterization of syn- and anti-isomers of retinal oximes. Analyt Biochem 99:304–310Google Scholar
  17. Groenendijk GWT, De Grip WJ, Daemen FJM (1980) Quantitative determination of retinals with complete retention of their geometric configuration. Biochim Biophys Acta 617:430–438Google Scholar
  18. Hartwig HG (1980) The structure of the pineal gland. In: Epple A, Stetson MH (eds) Avian endocrinology. Academic Press, New York, pp 31–51Google Scholar
  19. Hartwig HG (1984) Cyclic renewal of whole pineal photoreceptor outer segments. Ophthalmic Res 16:102–106Google Scholar
  20. Hartwig HG, Oksche A (1982) Neurobiological aspects of extraretinal photoreceptive systems: structure and function. Experientia 38:991–996Google Scholar
  21. Husain OAN, Millett JA, Grainger JM (1980) Use of polylysine-coated slides in the preparation of cell samples for diagnostic cytology with special reference to urine samples. J Clin Pathol 33:309–311Google Scholar
  22. Jansen HG, Sanyal S, De Grip WJ, Schalken JJ (1987) Development and degeneration of retina in rds mutant mice: Ultraimmunohistochemical localization of opsin. Exp Eye Res 44:347–361Google Scholar
  23. Kappers JA (1971) The pineal organ: an introduction. In: Wolstenholm GEW, Knight J (eds) The pineal gland. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Korf H-W, Vigh-Teichmann I (1984) Sensory and central nervous elements in the avian pineal organ. Ophthalmic Res 16:96–101Google Scholar
  25. Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Margry RJCF, Jacobs CWM, Bonting SL, De Grip WJ, Daemen FJM (1983) Detergent-induced specificity of anti-rhodopsin serum for opsin micro-complement fixation studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 742:465–470Google Scholar
  27. Menaker M, Oksche A (1974) The avian pineal organ. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian biology, vol IV. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Menaker M, Wisner S (1983) Temperature-compensated circadian clock in the pineal ofAnolis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:6119–6121Google Scholar
  29. Morita T (1966) Absence of electrical activity of the pigeon's pineal organ in response to light. Experientia 22:402Google Scholar
  30. Papermaster DS (1982) Preparation of antibodies to rhodopsin and the large protein of outer segments. Methods Enzymol 81:240–246Google Scholar
  31. Ralph CL, Dawson DC (1968) Failure of the pineal body of two species of birds (Coturnix japonica andPasser domesticus) to show electrical responses to illumination. Experientia 24:147–148Google Scholar
  32. Schalken JJ (1987) The visual pigment rhodopsin: Immunocytochemical aspects and induction of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. PhD thesis, Dept Biochemistry, Center for Eye Research, University of Nijmegen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Schalken JJ, De Grip WJ (1986) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitative determination of the visual pigment rhodopsin in total-eye extracts. Exp Eye Res 43:431–439Google Scholar
  34. Semm P, Demaine C (1983) Electrical responses to direct and indirect photic stimulation of the pineal gland in the pigeon. J Neural Transmiss 58:281–289Google Scholar
  35. Sheffield J, Fischmann D (1970) Intercellular junctions in the developing neural retina of the chick embryo. Z Zellforsch 104:405–418Google Scholar
  36. Slonaker JR (1921) The development of the eye and its accessory parts in the English sparrow (Passer domesticus). J Morphol 35:263–357Google Scholar
  37. Sternberger LA (1979) Immunocytochemistry. Wiley, New York Chichester Brisbane TorontoGoogle Scholar
  38. Tabata M, Suzuki T, Niwa H (1985) Chromophores in the extraretinal photoreceptor (pineal organ) of teleosts. Brain Res 338:173–176Google Scholar
  39. Veen TH van, Elofsson R, Hartwig H-G, Geri I, Mocchzuki M, Klein DC (1986a) Retinal S-antigen: immunocytochemical and immunochemical studies on the distribution in animal photoreceptors and pineal organs. Exp Biol 45:15–25Google Scholar
  40. Veen TH van, Ostholm T, Gierschik P, Spiegel A, Somers R, Korf H-W, Klein DC (1986b) alpha-Transducin immunoreactivity in the retinae and sensory pineal organs of adult vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 834:912–916Google Scholar
  41. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I (1981) Light- and electron-microscopic demonstration of immunoreactive opsin in the pinealocytes of various vertebrates. Cell Tissue Res 221:451–463Google Scholar
  42. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I (1986) Three types of photoreceptors in the pineal and frontal organs of frogs: ultrastructural and opsin immunoreactivity. Arch Histol Jpn 49:495–518Google Scholar
  43. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I, Aros B (1975) Comparative ultrastructure of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons and pinealocytes. Cell Tissue Res 158:409–424Google Scholar
  44. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I, Röhlich P, Aros B (1982) Immunoreactive opsin in the pineal organ of reptiles and birds. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch 96:113–129Google Scholar
  45. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I, Aros B, Oksche A (1985) Sensory cells of the ‘rod-’ and ‘cone-type’ in the pineal organ ofRana esculenta, as revealed by immunoreaction against opsin and by the presence of an oil (lipid) droplet. Cell Tissue Res 240:143–148Google Scholar
  46. Vigh B, Vigh-Teichmann I, Reinhard A, Szèl A, Van Veen T (1986) Opsin immunoreactions in the developing and adult pineal organ. In: Gupta D, Reiter RJ (eds) The pineal gland during development: From fetus to adult. Croom Helm, London Sydney, pp 31–42Google Scholar
  47. Vigh-Teichmann I, Vigh B (1979) A comparison of epithalamic, hypothalamic and spinal neurosecretory terminals. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hungaricae 30:1–39Google Scholar
  48. Vigh-Teichmann I, Vigh B, Szèl A, Röhlich P, Wirtz GH (1988) Immunocytochemical localization of vitamin A in the retina and pineal organ of the frog,Rana esculenta. Histochemistry 88:533–543Google Scholar
  49. Wainwright SD, Wainwright LK (1981) Regulation of the cycle in chick pineal serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity in vitro by light. J Neurochem 35:451–457Google Scholar
  50. Wald G (1968) Molecular basis of visual excitation. Science 162:230–239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Foster
    • 1
  • J. J. Schalken
    • 2
  • A. M. Timmers
    • 2
  • W. J. De Grip
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Gilmer HallUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry, Center for Eye ResearchUniversity of NijmegenHB NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations