Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 139, Issue 4, pp 277–285 | Cite as

An equivalent circuit for the quantitative description of inter-receptor coupling in the retina of the desert antCataglyphis bicolor

  • Francis G. Martin
  • Michael I. Mote


  1. 1.

    An ionic equivalent circuit model is developed for the purpose of quantifying the strengths of electrical coupling existing between certain receptor cells in the compound eye ofCataglyphis bicolor which show wavelength dependence in the slopes of their ‘V logI’ relations and orientations of maximum PS (Mote and Wehner, 1980). It combines the pure electrical equivalent of the plasma membrane, as proposed by Finkelstein and Mauro (1963), and a closed series circuit such that Kirchhoff's laws are applicable.

  2. 2.

    The model is applied to hypothetical pairs of cells with different sensitivities and different strengths of interaction. It predicts that cells are most strongly coupled when at rest and most weakly coupled when most active. When one is active and the second is not then “apparent rectification” can occur since the coupling strength is not symmetrical. This means that both “resting” and “dynamic” coupling coefficients must be considered. Transition between these modes causes irregularities in the ‘V logI’ relation of a weakly excited cell which is coupled to a strongly excited cell.

  3. 3.

    The model is then applied to data obtained from photoreceptors in the compound eye ofCataglyphis. It adequately simulates the wavelength dependence of both the ‘V logI’ relation (Fig. 6) and the orientation of maximum PS (Fig. 7) measured in these cells. In its simplest form the model permits an estimate of the coupling coefficients which are greater than 0.6 for strongly coupled cells and less than 0.4 for weakly coupled cells.

  4. 4.

    A hypothetical treatment of pairs of coupled cells under conditions approaching the natural situation in the animal's environment suggests that super-numerary analyzers of polarized light in the u.v. could arise through receptor coupling in certain ommatidial types found in the eye ofCataglyphis.



Retina Equivalent Circuit Coupling Coefficient Wavelength Dependence Equivalent Circuit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



designations of receptor classes defined previously


polarization sensitivity



V log I

response vs intensity function


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Behrens, M.E., Wulff, V.J.: Light initiated responses of retinula and eccentric cells in theLimulus lateral eye. J. Gen. Physiol.48, 1081–1093 (1965)Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, M.V.L.: Physiology of electrotonic junctions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.137, 509–539 (1966)Google Scholar
  3. Butler, R., Horridge, G.A.: The electrophysiology of the retina ofPeriplaneta L. 1. Changes in receptor sensitivity upon light/dark adaptation. J. Comp. Physiol.83, 263–278 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Chi, C., Carlson, S.D.: Close apposition of photoreceptor cell axons in the housefly. J. Insect. Physiol.22, 1153–1157 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Duelli, P.: A fovea for e-vector orientation in the eye ofCataglyphis bicolor. J. Comp. Physiol.102, 43–56 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Duelli, P., Wehner, R.: The spectral sensitivity of polarized light orientation inCataglyphis bicolor. (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J. Comp. Physiol.86, 37–53 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. Fain, G.L.: Quantum sensitivity of rods in the toad retina. Science187, 838–841 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Finkelstein, A., Mauro, A.: Equivalent circuits as related to ionic systems. Biophys. J.3, 215–237 (1963)Google Scholar
  9. Helversen, O. von, Edrich, W.: Der Polarisationsempfänger im Bienenauge: ein Ultraviolettrezeptor. J. Comp. Physiol.94, 33–47 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. Herrling, P.L.: Regional distribution of three ultrastructural retinula types in the retina ofCataglyphis bicolor Fabr. (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Cell Tissue Res.169, 247–266 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Kirschfeld, K.: Die notwendige Anzahl von Rezeptoren zur Bestimmung der Richtung des elektrischen Vektors linear polarisation Lichtes. Z. Naturforsch.27b, 578–579 (1972)Google Scholar
  12. Laughlin, S.B.: Receptor function in the apposition eye — an electrophysiological approach. In: Photoreceptor optics. Snyder, A.W., Menzel, R. (eds.), pp. 479–498. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
  13. Lillywhite, P.G.: Coupling between locust photoreceptors revealed by a study of quantum bumps. J. Comp. Physiol.125, 13–27 (1978)Google Scholar
  14. Menzel, R., Blakers, M.: Colour receptors in the bee eye. Morphology and spectral sensitivity. J. Comp. Physiol.108, 11–33 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, E.P.: Golgi-EM-study of the first and second order neurons in the visual system ofCataglyphis bicolor Fabricius (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zoomorphologie92, 115–139 (1979)Google Scholar
  16. Mimura, K.: Electrophysiological evidence for interaction between retinula cells in the flesh fly. J. Comp. Physiol.125, 209–216 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. Mote, M.I., Goldsmith, T.H.: Spectral sensitivities of color receptors in the compound eye of the cockroachPeriplaneta. J. Exp. Zool.173, 137–146 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. Mote, M.I., Wehner, R.: Functional properties of photoreceptors in the compound eye and ocellus of the Desert Ant,Cataglyphis bicolor. J. Comp. Physiol.137, 63–71 (1980)Google Scholar
  19. Muller, K.: Photoreceptors in the crayfish compound eye: electrical interactions between cells as related to polarized light sensitivity. J. Physiol. (London)232, 573–595 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Ribi, W.A.: Gap junctions coupling photoreceptor axons in the first optic ganglion of the fly. Cell Tissue Res.195, 299–308 (1978)Google Scholar
  21. Ribi, W.A.: Do the rhabdomeric structures in bees and flies really twist? J. Comp. Physiol.134, 109–112 (1979)Google Scholar
  22. Shaw, S.R.: Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honeybee and locust compound eyes. Vision Res.9, 999–1029 (1969)Google Scholar
  23. Tsukahara, T., Horridge, G.A.: Interaction between two retinula cell types in the anterior eye of the droneflyEristalis. J. Comp. Physiol.115, 287–298 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. Wehner, R.: Space constancy of the visual world of insects. Fortschr. Zool.23, 148–160 (1975)Google Scholar
  25. Wehner, R., Bernard, G., Geiger, E.: Twisted and non-twisted rhabdoms and their significance for polarization detection in bees. J. Comp. Physiol.164, 225–245 (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis G. Martin
    • 1
  • Michael I. Mote
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations