Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 141, Issue 3, pp 303–310 | Cite as

The electrical light response of theLimulus ventral nerve photoreceptor, a superposition of distinct components — Observable by variation of the state of light adaptation

  • Günther Maaz
  • Karoly Nagy
  • Hennig Stieve
  • Josef Klomfaß
Article

Summary

Light-initiated two component receptor potentials and the transmembrane currents which generate them were recorded from ventral nerve photoreceptors ofLimulus polyphemus using intracellular microelectrodes. The magnitude and temporal separation of the two components could be manipulated by using pairs of light pulses of variable duration, repetition rate and intensity; the optimal values of these parameters for component separation varied among preparations, but two components could be obtained fromall ventral nerve photoreceptors tested.

Light adaptation reduces the magnitude of the second component,C2, much more strongly than the first component,C1, so thatC2 can be completely suppressed whileC1 persists with a partially reduced magnitude. On the other hand, receptor potentials elicited from dark adapted or moderately light adapted ventral photoreceptors by intense light pulses are dominated by theC2 component. The light-initiated currents recorded under similar conditions, but voltage-clamped, are also dominated by theC2 component. It is conceivable that the plateau of an electrical response to a prolonged light stimulus is dominated by theC1 component, which is less sensitive to light adaptation, whereas the transient phase of the response is dominated byC2.

The light-initiated currents which generate componentsC1 andC2 of the receptor potentials were recorded while the ventral photoreceptor membrane potential was voltage clamped at various levels. The results indicate that the occurrence of the two components in the transient is not dependent on membrane voltage and that the reversal potentials of the two components do not differ significantly on the average in our measurements (6 experiments). Both, chord and slope conductances are much greater (by a factor of ca. 5) forC2 thanC1.

Keywords

Light Pulse Reversal Potential Receptor Potential Light Stimulus Light Response 

Abbreviations

ReP

receptor potential

PMP

prestimulus membrane potential

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benolken RM, Russel CJ (1967) Tetrodotoxin blocks a graded sensory response in the eye ofLimulus. Science 155:1576–1577Google Scholar
  2. Brown JE, Blinks JR (1974) Changes in intracellular free calcium concentration during illumination of invertebrate photoreceptors. Detection with aequorin. J Gen Physiol 64:643–665Google Scholar
  3. Clark RB, Duncan G (1978) Two components of extracellularly-recorded photoreceptor potentials in the cephalopod retina: Differential effects of Na+, K+, and Ca++. Biophys Struct Mech 4:263–300Google Scholar
  4. Detwiler PB (1976) Multiple light-evoked conductance changes in the photoreceptors ofHermissenda crassicornis. J Physiol 256:691–708Google Scholar
  5. Lisman JE, Brown JE (1971) Two light-induced processes in the photoreceptor cells ofLimulus ventral eye. J Gen Physiol 58:544–561Google Scholar
  6. Lisman JE, Strong JA (1979) The initiation of excitation and light adaptation inLimulus ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 73:219–243Google Scholar
  7. Millecchia R, Mauro A (1969a) The ventral photoreceptor cells ofLimulus. II. The basic photoresponse. J Gen Physiol 54:310–330Google Scholar
  8. Millecchia R, Mauro A (1969b) The ventral photoreceptor cell ofLimulus. III. A voltage-clamp study. J Gen Physiol 54:331–351Google Scholar
  9. Pepose JS, Lisman JE (1978) Voltage-sensitive potassium channels inLimulus ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 71:101–120Google Scholar
  10. Sokol BA, Srebro R (1979) Broad area illumination affects the amplitude distribution of discrete waves (DWs) ofLimulus ventral photoreceptors. ARVO, 1979, Annual Spring Meeting, Sarasota, Florida, April 30–May 4, 1979, ARVO AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  11. Srebro R, Behbehani M (1974) Discrete waves and phototransduction in voltage-clamped ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 64:186–200Google Scholar
  12. Stieve H, Claßen-Linke I (1980) The effect of changed extracellular calcium and sodium concentration on the electroretinogram of the crayfish retina. Z Naturforsch 35c:308–318Google Scholar
  13. Stieve H, Bruns M, Gaube H (1977) Ability of light-induced conductance change of arthropod visual cell membrane, indirectly depending on membrane potential, during depolarization by external potassium or ouabain. Z. Naturforsch. 32c:885–869Google Scholar
  14. Wulff VJ (1973) The effect of sodium, potassium and calcium onLimulus lateral eye retinular cells. Vision Res 13: 2309–2326Google Scholar
  15. Wulff VJ, Fahy JL (1979) Influence of calcium on theLimulus photoreceptor potential. Brain Res Bull 4:809–818Google Scholar
  16. Wulff VJ, Mueller WJ (1973) On the origin of the receptor potential in the lateral eye ofLimulus. Vision Res 13:661–671Google Scholar
  17. Wulff VJ, Mueller WJ, Fahy JL (1977) A study of light-initiated currents inLimulus lateral eye retinular cells. Brain Res Bull 2:113–121Google Scholar
  18. Wulff VJ, Fahy JL, Mueller WJ (1979) Partial voltage clamping ofLimulus ventral photoreceptor potentials: evidence of programmed conductance changes. Brain Res Bull 4:819–827Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günther Maaz
    • 1
  • Karoly Nagy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hennig Stieve
    • 1
  • Josef Klomfaß
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Neurobiologie der Kernforschungsanlage JülichJülichFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research CentreHungarian Academy of SciencesSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations