Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 151, Issue 4, pp 483–486 | Cite as

Thetrp is aDrosophila mutant sensitive to developmental temperature

  • Baruch Minke
Article

Summary

In thetrp mutant ofDrosophila the receptor potential decays close to baseline during prolonged illumination (Fig. 1). The mutant can be characterized by two parameters: the rate of decay of the receptor potential towards the dark baseline during illumination (decay rate) and the recovery time of the responses in the dark following prolonged illumination (dark recovery). These parameters may be modulated consistently: rearing the fly at 19 °C instead of 25 °C slows the decay rate but speeds up an initial phase of the dark recovery when measurements are performed at 25 °C (Figs. 1, 2). A transition from one phenotype to the other and vica versa is observed within a few days when the adults are transferred from one temperature to the other (Fig. 3). This suggests turnover of the defective gene product.

Keywords

Gene Product Decay Rate Initial Phase Recovery Time Receptor Potential 

Abbreviations

trp

transient receptor potential mutant

ERG

electroretinogram

R1–6

the peripheral photoreceptors of the fly

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cosens DJ (1971) Blindness in aDrosophila mutant. J Insect Physiol 17:285–302Google Scholar
  2. Cosens DJ, Manning A (1969) Abnormal electroretinogram from aDrosophila mutant. Nature (London) 224:285–287Google Scholar
  3. Minke B (1977)Drosophila mutant with a transducer defect. Biophys Struct Mech 3: 59–63Google Scholar
  4. Minke B (1982) Light-induced reduction in excitation efficiency in thetrp mutant ofDrosophila. J Gen Physiol 79:361–385Google Scholar
  5. Minke B, Wu C-F, Pak WL (1975) Induction of photoreceptor voltage noise in the dark inDrosophila mutant. Nature (London) 258:84–87Google Scholar
  6. Minke B, Armon E (1980) Intermediate processes in phototransduction: a study inDrosophila mutants. Photochem Photobiol 32:553–562Google Scholar
  7. Stephenson RS, O'Tousa J, Scavarda NJ, Randall LL, Pak WL (1982)Drosophila mutants with reduced rhodopsin content. Soc Exp Biol Symposium on Biology of Photoreceptors. (In press)Google Scholar
  8. Swanson GJ, Cosens D (1981) A comparative study of specific chromatic adaptation of the wild type andtrp mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 27:215–223Google Scholar
  9. Wilcox MJ (1980) The ionic mechanism of the photoreceptor in mutant and wild typeDrosophila melanogaster Ph.D. thesis — Purdue University, West Lafayette, IndianaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baruch Minke
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Department of PhysiologyThe Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical SchoolJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.The Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityW. LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations