Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 159, Issue 4, pp 545–557 | Cite as

The eye of a passeriform bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics

  • Graham R. Martin
Article

Summary

The European starling,Sturnus vulgaris, is a diurnal, ground feeding bird of the order Passeriformes. Aspects of its visual fields, eye movements and the optical structure of its eye are described.
  1. 1.

    The magnitude of eye movements as a function of elevation in the median sagittal plane of the head was measured (Fig. 1). Maximum eye movement amplitude (32°) occurs in a plane which passes 50°–60° below the closed bill while the minimum amplitude (11°) occurs in a plane approximately orthogonal to this.

     
  2. 2.

    The ways in which eye movements can alter the binocular and cyclopean retinal visual fields are described (Figs. 3 and 5). When the eyes are fully converged maximum binocular overlap equals 43° and this occurs approximately 40° below the bill. The bill intrudes into the visual field and when the bill is fully open, maximum binocular field width occurs between the mandibles. The eyes can also be swung backwards and upwards so that the margins of the monocular fields just coincide behind the head to give extensive visual coverage of the celestial hemisphere. When the eyes are in this position the frontal binocular field is almost abolished.

     
  3. 3.

    The monocular retinal field is asymmetric about the optic axis and this can be attributed to asymmetry in the gross structure of the eye rather than asymmetry in the optical system (Figs. 4 and 9). From purely optical considerations the starling could have a maximum binocular field width twice that actually found.

     
  4. 4.

    A schematic model of the starling eye optical system (Fig. 4 and Table 2) shows that optically this ‘flat-diurnal’ eye is a small scaled version of the larger ‘tubular-nocturnal’ eye of an owl (Figs. 6 and 7). In addition the calculated optical fields of these two eyes are very similar (Fig. 8), and these eyes differ in their maximum retinal image brightness by only 0.33 log10 (Table 4). However, although the rat and starling eyes are of similar total dioptric power they are found to be of quite different optical design (Fig. 7). It is concluded that no particular ‘diurnal’ feature can be discerned in the optical structure of the starling eye.

     
  5. 5.

    The starling feeds mainly on the ground where it is known to employ vision to locate prey at short range. However, when foraging it is vulnerable to aerial predators. The visual problems which this presents are considered. How the bird's visual fields and eye movements may cope with these problems are discussed. There is evidence that the starling eye may embody a ‘ramp’ retina as a static accommodatory device which could facilitate the simultaneous detection of both close prey and distant predators (Fig. 9 and Table 5).

     

Keywords

Visual Field Optical Structure European Starling Aerial Predator Binocular Field 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker RR (1978) The evolutionary ecology of animal migration. Hodder and Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett SA (1963) A study in behaviour. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Beecher WJ (1978) Feeding adaptations and evolution in the starlings. Bull Chicago Acad Sci 11:269–298Google Scholar
  4. Bloch S, Rivaud S, Martinoya C (1984) Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. III. Different patterns of eye movements for binocular and monocular fixation. Behav Brain Res 13:173–182Google Scholar
  5. Bonnet R (1964) La topographie cornéenne. Desroches, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowmaker JK (1979) Visual pigments and oil droplets in the pigeon retina, as measured by microspectrophotometry and their relationship to spectral sensitivity. In: Granda AM, Maxwell JH (eds) Neural mechanisms of behaviour in the pigeon. Plenum, New York, pp 287–305Google Scholar
  7. Catania AC (1964) On the visual acuity of the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 7:361–366Google Scholar
  8. Donner KO (1951) The visual acuity of some passerine birds. Acta Zool Fennica 66:1–40Google Scholar
  9. Duke-Elder S (1958) System of ophthalmology, vol 1. The eye in evolution. Henry Kimpton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Emsley HH (1948) Visual optics, 4th ed. Hatton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Feare C (1984) The starling. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodge WR (1960) Adaptations for amphibious vision in the Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus). J Morphol 107:79–91Google Scholar
  13. Gullstrand A (1909) Appendix in Helmholtz H (1909)Google Scholar
  14. Helmholtz H von (1909) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. 3rd ed. Gullstrand et al. (eds) English translation by JPC Southall, 1924. Optical Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirsch J (1982) Falcon visual sensitivity to grating contrasts. Nature 300:57–58Google Scholar
  16. Howcroft MJ, Parker JA (1977) Aspheric curvature for the human lens. Vision Res 17:1217–1223Google Scholar
  17. Hughes A (1972) A schematic eye for the rabbit. Vision Res 12:123–138Google Scholar
  18. Hughes A (1976) A supplement to the cat schematic eye. Vision Res 16:149–154Google Scholar
  19. Hughes A (1977) The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: Comparative optics and retinal organisation. In: Crescitelli F (ed) The visual system of vertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/5) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 613–756Google Scholar
  20. Hughes A (1979) A schematic eye for the rat. Vision Res 19:569–588Google Scholar
  21. Kramer G (1952) Experiments on bird orientation. Ibis 94:265–285Google Scholar
  22. Land MF (1981) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6B) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–594Google Scholar
  23. Levy B, Sivak JG (1980) Mechanism of accommodation in the bird eye. J Comp Physiol 137:267–272Google Scholar
  24. MacFadden SA, Reymond L (1985) A further look at the binocular field of the pigeon (Columba livia). Vision Res 25:1741–1746Google Scholar
  25. Marshall J, Mellerio J, Palmer DA (1973) A schematic eye for the pigeon. Vision Res 13:2449–2453Google Scholar
  26. Martin GR (1982) An owl's eye: Schematic optics and visual performance inStrix aluco L. J Comp Physiol 145:341–349Google Scholar
  27. Martin GR (1983) Schematic eye models in vertebrates. In: Ottoson D (ed) Progress in sensory physiology, vol 4. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 43–82Google Scholar
  28. Martin GR (1984) The visual fields of the tawny owlStrix aluco. Vision Res 24:1739–1751Google Scholar
  29. Martin GR (1985) Eye. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds, vol III. Academic Press, London, PP 311–373Google Scholar
  30. Martin GR (1986) Total panoramic vision in the mallard duck,Anas platyrhynchos. Vision Res 26:1303–1305Google Scholar
  31. Martin GR, Young SR (1983) The retinal binocular field of the pigeon (Columba livia: English racing homer). Vision Res 23:911–915Google Scholar
  32. Martin GR, Young SR (1984) The eye of the Humboldt penguin,Spheniscus humboldti: Visual fields and schematic optics. Proc R Soc Lond B 223:197–222Google Scholar
  33. Martinoya C, Le Houezec J, Bloch S (1984) Pigeon's eyes converge during feeding: evidence for frontal binocular fixation in a lateral-eyed bird. Neurosci Lett 45:335–339Google Scholar
  34. Martinoya C, Rey J, Bloch S (1981) Limits of the pigeon's binocular field and direction for best binocular viewing. Vision Res 21:1193–1200Google Scholar
  35. Meyer DBC (1977) The avian eye and its adaptations. In: Crescitelli F (ed) The visual system of vertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/5) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 549–612Google Scholar
  36. Millodot M, Blough PM (1971) The refractive state of the pigeon eye. Vision Res 11:1019–1022Google Scholar
  37. Nye PW (1969) The monocular eye movements of the pigeon. Vision Res 9:133–144Google Scholar
  38. Pettigrew JD (1983) A note on the eye of the letter-winged kiteElanus scriptus. Emu 82:305–308Google Scholar
  39. Pumphrey RJ (1948) The sense organs of birds. Ibis 90:171–199Google Scholar
  40. Remtulla S, Hallett PE (1985) A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat. Vision Res 25:21–31Google Scholar
  41. Reymond L (1985) Spatial visual acuity of the eagleAquila audax: a behavioural, optical and anatomical investigation. Vision Res 25:1477–1491Google Scholar
  42. Rochon-Duvigneaud A (1943) Les yeux et la vision des vertébrés. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Sivak JG (1976) The accommodative significance of the ‘ramp’ retina of the eye of the stingray. Vision Res 16:945–950Google Scholar
  44. Sivak JG, Allen DB (1975) An evaluation of the ‘ramp’ retina of the horse eye. Vision Res 15:1353–1356Google Scholar
  45. Slonaker JR (1918) A physiological study of the anatomy of the eye and its accessory parts of the English sparrow (Passer domesticus). J Morphol 31:351–359Google Scholar
  46. Snyder AW, Laughlin SB, Stavenga DG (1977) Information capacity of eyes. Vision Res 17:1163–1175Google Scholar
  47. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Davey JB, Sheridan M, Tanner JM (1957) Emmetropia and its aberrations. Med Res Counc (GB) Spec Rep Ser 293Google Scholar
  48. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M (1961) Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye from the age of three. Med Res Counc (GB) Spec Rep Ser 301Google Scholar
  49. Steinbach MJ, Money KE (1973) Eye movements of the owl. Vision Res 13:889–891Google Scholar
  50. Tansley K (1965) Vision in vertebrates. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Vakkur GJ, Bishop PO (1963) The schematic eye in the cat. Vision Res 3:357–381Google Scholar
  52. Wallman J, Pettigrew JD (1985) Conjugate and disjunctive saccades in two avian species with contrasting oculomotor strategies. J Neurosci 5:1418–1428Google Scholar
  53. Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Institute of Science, MichiganGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham R. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Zoology and Comparative Physiology and of Extramural StudiesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations