Functional and temporal analysis of sound production inGalleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
- 70 Downloads
Pulses of 75 kHz ultrasound are produced when male greater wax moths,Galleria mellonella L. flutter their wings. These moths use this acoustical system to coordinate their pheromone release for mate calling. The conditions under which males generate the sound pulses, and the mechanism of sound production are described forG. mellonella.
G. mellonella generates the ultrasound when it activates sound producing mechanisms on its tegulae. Wing motion pushes down a tegular-wing coupler attached to the tegula below a tymbal. This coupler, when pushed down by the wing, activates the tymbal, causing it to buckle in and produce a sound pulse. Upon release of pressure, the tymbal snaps back to produce a second sound pulse.
MaleG. mellonella generated sound only when close to or contacting other insects. Insects which caused males to generate sound include either male or femaleG. mellonella and male or femaleAchroia grisella. G. mellonella males did not produce sound in the presence of their natural honeybee hosts. The evidence suggests that maleG. mellonella produce more sound pulses per hour each when calling in groups.
MaleG. mellonella could be observed producing sound only under dim light, about 2 lux or less. Males begin to call shortly after sunset, with peak repetition rate frequency occurring during the first two hours. The rate decreases throughout the night, but on warmer nights some sound production continues until sunrise. The light level under which males begin calling approximates the light level within a honeybee hive.
KeywordsRepetition Rate Coupler Light Level Temporal Analysis Rate Frequency
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blest AD, Collett TS, Pye JD (1963) The generation of ultrasonic signals by a New World arctiid moth. Proc R Soc Lond B 158:196–207Google Scholar
- Ewing AW (1984) Acoustic signals and sexual behaviour. In: Lewis T (ed) Insect communication. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–240Google Scholar
- Finn WE, Payne TL (1977) Attraction of greater wax moth females to male-produced pheromones. Southwest Entomol 2:62–65Google Scholar
- Flint HM, Merkle JR (1983) Mating behavior, sex pheromone responses and radiation sterilization of the greater wax moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Econ Entomol 76:467–472Google Scholar
- Greenfield MD (1981) Moth sex pheromones: an evolutionary perspective. Fla Entomol 64:4–17Google Scholar
- Greenfield MD, Shaw KC (1983) Adaptive significance of chorusing with special reference to the Orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: Sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 1–27Google Scholar
- Griffin DR (1971) The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim Behav 19:55–61Google Scholar
- McCue JJG, Bertolini A (1964) A portable receiver for ultrasonic waves in air. Trans IEEE SU 11:41–49Google Scholar
- Ott L (1977) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MAGoogle Scholar
- Spangler HG (1985a) Sound production and communication in the greater wax moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:54–61Google Scholar
- Spangler HG (1985b) Detecting lesser wax moths acoustically. Gleanings Bee Cult 113:207–209, 218Google Scholar
- Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol Entomol 9:87–95Google Scholar
- Spangler HG, Takessian A (1983) Sound perception by two species of wax moths (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:94–97Google Scholar
- Spangler HG (in press) High-frequency sound production by honeybees. J Apic ResGoogle Scholar