Abstract
A marker study of nickel oxidation in SO2 at 600°C has proved that after the reaction metallic markers (Au, Pt, W) are covered with a sulfide rim. This effect is not observed on quartz markers. The metallic markers make the intermediate “NiO” layer adjacent to them increase, whereas the quartz marker makes this layer disappear.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. Vasantasree and M. G. Hocking,Corros. Sci. 16, 261 (1976).
M. G. Hocking and V. Vasantasree,Corros. Sci. 16, 279 (1976).
P. Kofstad and C. Åkesson,Oxid. Met. 12, 503 (1978);13, 57 (1979).
K. L. Luthra and W. L. Worrel,Metall. Trans. 9A, 1055 (1978).
K. L. Luthra and W. L. Worell,Metall. Trans. 10A, 621 (1979).
M. R. Wootton and N. Birks,Corros. Sci. 12, 829 (1972).
K. Kowalska, E. Roszczynialska and T. Werber, to be published.
C. B. Alcock, M. G. Hocking and S. Zador,Corros. Sci. 9, 117 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kowalska, K., Roszczynialska, E. & Werber, T. Effect of a marker material on the oxidation of nickel in sulfur dioxide. Oxid Met 15, 399–405 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603532
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603532