Skip to main content
Log in

Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Akmajian, Adrian: 1984, ‘Sentence Types and the Form-Function Fit’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers and Michael Harnish: 1979,Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele, and Thomas Wasow: 1979, ‘The Category AUX in Universal Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 10, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1979a, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 4, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1979b, ‘Montague Grammar and Classical Transformational Grammar’ in S. Davis and M. Mithun (eds.),Linguistics, Philosophy, and Montague Grammar, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 3–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1980, ‘Tenses and Aspects as Functions on Verb-Phrases’, in Christian Rohrer (ed.),Time, Tense and Quantifiers, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1983a, ‘Generalized Categorial Grammars and the English Auxiliary, in F. Heny and B. Richards (eds.),Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. Two, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1983b, ‘On the Relationship between Word-grammar and Phrase Grammar’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1984, ‘Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1957,Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1982,Lectures on Goverment and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin: 1975,Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin and Richard Larson: 1982, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of When-Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1979;Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTO, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1985, ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1982, ‘Phrase Structure Grammar’, in G. K. Pullum and P. Jacobson (eds.),On the Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag: 1980, ‘A Context-Free Phrase Structure Grammar for the English Auxiliary System’, unpublished manuscript.

  • Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag: 1982, Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restricted Theory of Grammar,Language 58, 591–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.),Speech Acts: Syntax and Semantics 3, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heny, Frank: 1982, ‘Tense, Aspect, and Time Adverbials, Part II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 109–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1964,Essentials of English Grammar, University of Alabama Press, Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, M.: 1984, ‘The Semantics of English Imperatives’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward and Leonard Faltz: 1978,Logical Types for Natural Languages, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3.

  • Lapointe, Steven: 1979, ‘A Lexical Analysis of the English Auxiliary Verb Systems’, in Tenn Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst, and M. Moorgat (eds.),Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, (=GLOT 2, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1977, ‘The Grammar of Quantification’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: 1974,Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1980, ‘Modifiers and Quantifiers in Natural Language’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume VI, pp. 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1975, ‘John is Easy to Please’, unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1976, ‘Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar’, in B. H. Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984a, ‘Compositionality’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics: Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984b, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1985, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Barry: 1982, ‘Tense, Aspect and Time Adverbials, Part I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 59–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Muffly E. A.: 1984, ‘Gapping and Interpretation’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Gregory T.: 1978, ‘Interpretive Gapping in Montague Grammar’,CLS 14.

  • Thomason, Richard H.: 1980, ‘A Model Theory for Propositional Attitudes”,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1980, ‘Predication’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1984, ‘There-Insertion’,Linguistic Inquiry 15, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, M.E.A. Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries. Linguist Philos 10, 53–75 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603392

Keywords

Navigation