Summary
The influence of contrast-depth and of the ratio between the combined light and dark areas was studied in 5 subjects. The subjects were dark-adapted and their pupils were dilated. Flash duration was 4 μsec; flashes were presented at a frequency of 2/sec; flash luminance was 3 mL unless otherwise noted. Unipolar leads were used (active electrode 21/2 cm above the inion, reference electrode at one earlobe, ground electrode over vertex).
Responses are averaged over 100 flashes, with the aid of a Nuclear Chicago data retrieval computer.
Results can be summarized as follows:
-
1.
Changes in contrast-depth at constant flash intensity as well as at constant overall flux result in a sigmoid shaped relation between the latency of the main negative component (invertedT-wave) and the contrast-depths; the amplitude decreases in a monotonical way.
-
2.
An increase in total flux results in a steeper, sigmoid, relation.
-
3.
The latency vs. contrast-depth function is independent of the spatial frequency of the pattern, for raster patterns as well as for checkerboards.
-
4.
An increase of the dark to light ratio up to 50/50 results in a linear decrease of the latency of the negative component. Beyond this value the latency does not change any more.
-
5.
The shape of the latency vs. contrast-depth function is dependent on the dark to light ratio, up to a ratio of 50/50, and independent at higher ratios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flom, M. C., Heath, G. G., Takahashi, E.: Contour interaction and visual resolution: contralateral effects. Science142, 979 (1963).
Glezer, V. D.: The receptive fields of the retina. Vision Res.5, 497 (1965).
Halliday, A. M., Michael, W. F.: Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J. Physiol. (Lond.)208, 499 (1970).
Jeffreys, D. A.: Separable components of human evoked responses to spatially patterned visual fields. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.24, 596 (1968).
MacKay, D. M.: Evoked brain potentials as indicators of sensory information processing. Neurosci. Res. Progr. Bull.7, 184 (1969).
Ratcliff, F.: Mach. bands: quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina, p. 150. San Francisco: Hocoen-Day 1965.
Rietveld, W. J.: The cocipitocortical response to light flashes in man. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.12, 373 (1963).
— MacKay, P. M.: Evoked, responses to acceleration and to tachistoscopic presentation of patterned visual stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.26, 534 (1969).
— Tordoir, W. E. M.: The influence of flash intensity upon the visual evoked response in the human cortex. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.13, 160 (1965a).
—— Duyff, J. W.: Contribution of fovea and parafovea to the visual evoked response. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.13, 330 (1965b).
—— Hagenouw, J. R. B., van Dongen, K. J.: Contribution of fovea parafoveal quadrants to the visual evoked response. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.13, 340 (1965c).
——— Lubbers, J. A.: Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes. Acta physiol. pharmacol. neerl.14, 259 (1967).
Spehlmann, R.: The average electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.19, 560 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (Z.W.O.)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rietveld, W.J., Hagenouw, J.R.B. Influence on cortical responses to patterned flashes of contrast-depth and of the ratio between the combined light and dark areas. Pflugers Arch. 322, 235–249 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00602072
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00602072