Skip to main content
Log in

US-guided breast biopsy with an automated cutting needle

  • Breast imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors report their experience on the use of a biopsy gun for histological sampling in the field of breast lesions. The use of cytological sampling by (FNAB) fine needle aspiration biopsy has been preferred so far, because it has been thoutht to be simpler, less risky and reliable. Nevertheless, the cytological sampling shows a number of drawbacks such as the need for passes to get sufficient cellular material, frequent problems in diagnosing benign lesions and the decisive influence of the operator's skill. By using a biopsy gun for histological sampling these disadvantages are eliminated. In this case, in fact, the validity of the sample is not influenced by the operator's skill; fewer passes are necessary and their validity does not depend on the nature of the lesion. The personal series of cases involves 91 patients subjected to histological sampling for suspected lesions. Two different kinds of needles were used with one an 18 G diameter and a 23-mm extension of the sytlet, as well as a sampling window 17 mm; the other with the same diameter and extension of the stylet, as as a sampling window 8 mm. The first needle was used in all 91 patients, and the second only in 30. The results were not influenced by the employ of the different kinds of needles. A total of 268 samples were made and 110 lesions were discovered, 79 of which were malignant and 31 benign (fibroadenoma, fibrocystic change and epitheliosis). Three carcinomas were not found (3 false-negative) and one specimen was inadequate. The values of sensibility, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the method were, respectively, 96.2%, 100% and 97.2%, with 3.8% false-negative due to three cases where the lesion was not centred for guidance mistake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant CS, Goellner JR, Welch JS et al. (1986) Fine needle aspiration of the breast. Mayo Clin Proc 61: 377–381

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hann L, Ducatman BS, Wang HH et al. (1989) Nonpalpable breast lesion evaluation by means of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 171: 373–376

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kahky MP, Rone R, Duncan DL et al. (1988) Needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast masses. Am J Surg 156: 450–452

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shabot MM, Goldberg IM, Schick P et al. (1982) Aspiration cytology is superior to tru-cut needle biopsy in establishing the diagnosis of clinically suspicious breast masses. Ann Surg 196: 122–126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macchini M, Baffoni L, Natale S et al. (1993) Microistologia mammaria nella stereotassi. Radiol Med 85: 753–755

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer JE (1992) Value of large core biopsy of occult breast lesions. AJR 158: 991–992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al. (1990) Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 176: 741–747

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dronkers DJ (1992) Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 183: 631–634

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matricardi L, Lovati R, Nazzaro V et al. (1992) L'impiego dell'ecografia e delta puntura percutanea ecoguidata in aggiunta alla mammografia per l'individuazione dei tumor maligni della mammella. Radiol Med 83: 395–401

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norton LW, Pearlman NW (1988) Needle localization breast biopsy: accuracy versus cost. Am J Surg 156(2): 1313–1513

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elston CW, Cotton RE, Davies CJ (1978) A comparison of the use of the “tru-cut” needle and fine needle aspiration cytopathology in the pre-operative diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology 2: 239–254

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alberti R, Mariuzzi L, Vecchi A (1993) L'agoaspirazione dei noduli mammari con ago sottile nella diagnosi e nella prognosi. Friuli Medico XLVIII, 9–17

  13. Davies CJ, Elston CW Cotton RE et al. (1977) Preoperative diagnosis in carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 64: 326–328

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dixon JM, Lamb J, Anderson TJ (1983) Fine needle aspiration of the breast: importance of the operator. Lancet 11: 564–567

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Bravetti P (1989) Nonpalpable breast lesion: stereotaxic fine needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 173: 57–59

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brenner RJ, Sickles EA (1989) Acceptability of periodic followup as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign. Radiology 171: 645–646

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kreula J (1990) Effect of sampling technique of specimen size in fine needle aspiration biopsy. Invest Radiol 12: 1294–1299

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazzocchi, M., Zuiani, C., Bendini, M. et al. US-guided breast biopsy with an automated cutting needle. Eur. Radiol. 4, 360–363 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00599071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00599071

Key words

Navigation