International Review of Education

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 187–211 | Cite as

To vocationalize or not to vocationalize? That is the curriculum question

  • George Psacharopoulos
Articles

Abstract

The paper presents a framework within which curriculum options can be analyzed, with emphasis on the economics of choosing the vocational intensity of instruction. Empirical evidence is reviewed at the primary, secondary and university levels regarding the costs and benefits of alternative programmes. Such evidence indicates that the costs of vocational programmes are considerably higher than those of general education, while their benefits are comparable. The paper questions the validity of providing more efficient alternatives like purely vocational institutions or employment-based training.

Zusammenfassung

In dem nachfolgenden Artikel wird ein Bezugsrahmen entworfen, innerhalb dessen Optionen des Curriculums unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Wirtschaftlichkeit einer beruflichen Orientierung des Schulsystems analysiert werden können. Empirisches Beweismaterial wird auf Primär-, Sekundärund Universitätsebene im Hinblick auf Kosten und Nutzen alternativer Programme überprüft. Die Ergebnisse der Überprüfung zeigen, daß berufsorientierte Erziehung in der Regel höhere Kosten verursacht und weniger Nutzen erzeugt als das allgemeine Erziehungssystem. Der Autor bezweifelt die Gültigkeit der Berufsausbildung als Bestandteil des allgemeinen Erziehungssystems und empfiehlt effizientere Alternativen wie reine Berufsausbildungsinstitute oder eine auf Berufstätigkeit basierende Ausbildung.

Résumé

L'article présente un cadre à l'intérieur duquel les choix de programmes peuvent être opérés en insistant sur les aspects économiques liés à la préférence pour l'intensité professionnelle de l'instruction. On y analyse des évidences empiriques recueillies aux niveaux primaire, secondaire et universitaire concernant les coûts et les bénéfices des programmes alternatifs. Ces données indiquent que les coûts de l'enseignement professionel sont considérablement plus élevés que ceux de l'enseignement général, alors que leurs bénéfices sont comparables. L'article met en cause le bienfondé de l'introduction d'un enseignement professionnel dans le courant principal de l'éducation et considère plus efficace d'avoir recours à d'autres alternatives comme les institutions pures de formation professionnelle ou celles de formation basée sur l'emploi.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, M. and Coombs, P.H. (eds.)Education for Rural Development: Case Studies for Planners. New York: Praeger, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Bukhari, N. ‘ISsues in Occupational Education: A Case Study in Jordan’. Stanford: SIDEC, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W.S. Jr. ‘Educational Change and Economic Development’.Sociology of Education. 40 (1967), NO. 2, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
  4. Blaug, M.Education and the Employment Problem in Developing Countries. Geneva: I.L.O., 1973.Google Scholar
  5. Castro, C. de Moura. ‘High Technology in Intermediate Countries? The Case of Brazil’. Brasilia: Instituto de Planejamento Economico e Social (June 1983) (mimeo).Google Scholar
  6. Chapman, D.W. and Windham, D.M. ‘Academic Program “Failures” and the Vocational School “Fallacy”: Policy Issues in Secondary Education in Somalia’.International Journal of Educational Development. 5 (1985), No. 4, pp. 269–282.Google Scholar
  7. Corazzini, A.J. ‘The Decision to Invest in Vocational Education: An Analysis of Costs and Benefits’.Journal of Human Resources. 3 (Supplement) (1968).Google Scholar
  8. Foster, P.J. ‘The Vocational School Fallacy in Development Planning’. In Anderson, C.A. and Bowman, M.J. (eds.)Education and Economic Development. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, W.P. ‘More Evidence Supporting the Demise of Pre-employment Vocational Trade Training: A Case Study of a Factory in India’.Comparative Education Review. 20 (1976), No. 1, pp. 30–41.Google Scholar
  10. Grubb, W. ‘The Phoenix of Vocational Education: Implications for Evaluation’. InThe Planning Paper for the Vocational Education Study. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1979, pp. 195–215.Google Scholar
  11. Grubb, W.N. ‘The Convergence of Educational Systems and the Role of Vocationalism’.Comparative Education Review. 29 (1985), No. 4, pp. 526–548.Google Scholar
  12. Gustman, A.L., and Steiner, T.L. ‘The Relation Between Vocational Training in High School and Economic Outcomes’. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 642, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Harma, R. ‘The Farmer Entrepreneur and his Prerequisite Prior Education in Agricultural Development’. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1979 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  14. Hinchliffe, K. ‘Cost Structures of Secondary Schooling in Tanzania and Colombia’. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, Education Department, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, T.W.Studies of the Cost-Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness of Vocational Education, National Center for Research in Vocational Education. Ohio State University, Information Series No. 202, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Jamison, D. and Lau, L.Farm Education and Farm Efficiency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  17. Jimenez, E., Kugler, B. and Horn, R. ‘An Economic Evaluation of a National Job Training System: Colombia'sServicio Nacional de Appredizaje (SENA)’. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, Education and Training Department, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. King, A. ‘Educational Needs of Society in Transition’.European Journal of Education. 20 (1985), Nos. 2–3, pp. 233–243.Google Scholar
  19. Lauglo, J. ‘Concepts of “General Education” and “Vocational Education”. Curricula for Post-compulsory Schooling in Western Industrialized Countries: When Should the Twain Meet?’.Comparative Education. 19 (1983), No. 3, pp. 285–304.Google Scholar
  20. Lauglo, J. ‘Practical Subjects in Academic Secondary Schools: An Evaluation of Industrial Education in Kenya’. London: Institute of Education, University of London, 1985 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  21. McGinn, N.F., and Bolart, E.T. ‘Una Evaluación de la Educación Media Technica en El Salvador’.Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos. 10 (1980), No. 2.Google Scholar
  22. Munoz Izquierdo, C. and Rodriguez, P. ‘La Ensenanza Tecnica: Canal de Movilidad Social para los Trabajadores?’.Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos. 10 (1980), No. 3, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  23. Narman, A.et al. ‘What Happens to Kenyan Secondary School Students with Industrial Education: A Tracer Study One Year After the KCE-Exam 1983’. University of Gothenburg, 1984 (mimeo), Table 3.1.Google Scholar
  24. Nazareth, A. ‘Microcomputer Simulation: Economics in Curricula Choice (ECC Model)’. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, Economic Development Institute, 1985 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  25. Nystrom, D. and Hennessy, J. ‘Cost Differential Analysis: Providing Data for Added Cost Funding’.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. (1985), pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
  26. Oxtoby, R. ‘Vocational Education and Development Planning: Emerging Issues in the Commonwealth Caribbean’.Comparative Education. 13 (1977), No. 3, pp. 223–243.Google Scholar
  27. Psacharopoulos, G. and Zabalza, A. ‘The Effect of Diversified Schools in Employment Status and Earnings in Colombia’.Economics of Education Review. 3 (1984), No. 4, pp. 315–331.Google Scholar
  28. Psacharopoulos, G. ‘An Evaluation of Curriculum Diversification in Colombia and Tanzania’.Comparative Education Review. 29 (1985a), No. 4, pp. 507–525.Google Scholar
  29. Psacharopoulos, G. ‘Returns to Education: A Further International Update and Implications’.Journal of Human Resources. 20 (1985b), No. 4, pp. 583–604 (and Appendix B, available from the author).Google Scholar
  30. Psacharopoulos, G.Higher Education in Developing Countries: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, Staff Working Paper No. 440, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. Sullivan, G. ‘Secondary School Leavers and the Labor Market in Swaziland’.International Journal of Educational Development. 1 (1981), No. 2, pp. 20–43.Google Scholar
  32. Taussig, M.K. ‘An Economic Analysis of Vocational Education in the New York City High Schools’.Journal of Human Resources. 3 (Supplement) (1968).Google Scholar
  33. Urquidi, V.L. ‘Technical Education in Mexico: A Preliminary Appraisal’.Prospects. 12 (1982), No. 1, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
  34. Urevbu, A.O. ‘Vocational Education in Nigeria: A Preliminary Appraisal’.International Journal of Educational Development. 4 (1984), No. 3, pp. 223–229.Google Scholar
  35. Vulliamy, G.SSCEP and High School Outstations: A Case Study. ERU Research Report No. 33. University of Papua New Guinea, 1980.Google Scholar
  36. Wanasinghe, J. ‘A Critical Examination of the Failure of the Junior Secondary School Curriculum and Pre-Vocational Studies in Sri Lanka’.International Journal of Educational Development. 2 (1982), No. 1, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  37. Weisberg, A. ‘What Research Has to Say About Vocational Education in the High Schools’.Phi Delta Kappa. 33 (1983), pp. 335–359.Google Scholar
  38. Wilms, W.W. ‘The Dubious Promise of Post-Secondary Vocational Education: Its Payoff to Dropouts and Graduates in the USA’.International Journal of Educational Development. 2 (1982), pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
  39. Zachariah, M. and Hoffman, A. ‘Gandhi and Mao on Manual Labor in the School: A Retrospective Analysis’.International Review of Education. 31 (1985), No. 3, pp. 265–282.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Psacharopoulos

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations