Skip to main content
Log in

Desensitization in denervated mouse muscles

  • Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology
  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In denervated mouse soleus (DSOL) muscle preparations washed in Na methanesulfonate solutions containing 30 mmol · l−1 K+, bath-applied ACh (55 μmol · l−1) caused the resting potential to decrease from about −36 to −3.2 mV within 2–4s; the potential remained stable or became slightly more negative when ACh was applied for 1–2 min. Two components of the membrane current change (ACh current) were found in DSOL when using a point voltage clamp, and initial current component declining to 1/2 the initial amplitude in 11–15 s (desensitization) and a steady late current comprising 16–47% of the maximum ACh current. Membrane conductance (in μs · cm−2) was 0.35 in the absence of ACh, 20.3 at the peak of the initial current, and 1.57 during late current. The late current saturated a 0.55 to 5.5 μmol · l−1 ACh, whereas the initial current required 55 or more μmol · l−1 ACh to saturate. The null (reversal) potential was 6–13 mV more positive for the late current than for the initial current. The late current was masked when Na+ was replaced by Tris+, sucrose, or K+. An initial and a late current could also be distinguished in non-denervated endplates. The late current was more sensitive to ACh than the initial current, but the null potenital was more negative than that for the initial current in endplates. In denervated membrane, the half time of desensitization was increased when Mg2+ was replaced by Ca2+ but the changes were on the average less than 15% the control values. It was concluded that desensitizing and non-desensitizing receptors may exist in extrajunctional membranes of denervated muscles and in endplates, the two being attached to different ionic channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bregestovski PD, Bukharaeva EA, Iljin VI (1979) Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine receptor desensitization in isolated mollusc neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 297:591–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg RS, Gage PW (1969) Ionic conductances of the surface and transverse tubular membranes of frog sartorius fibers. J Gen Physiol 53:279–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Fambrough DM (1979) Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev 59:165–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage PW (1976) Generation of end-plate potentials: Physiol Rev 56:177–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall MT, Maleque MA, Wadsworth RM (1975) Desensitization in the innervated and in the chronically denervated soleus muscle of the mouse. Br J Pharmacol 55:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall MT, Maleque MA, Wadsworth RM (11977) The role of extracellular calcium in the contractions produced by acetylcholine in chronically denervated muscle. Br J Pharmacol 61:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz B, Miledi R (1977) The reversal potential at the desensitized end-plate. Proc R Soc B 199:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz B, Thesleff S (1957) A study of the “desensitization” produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol (Lond) 138:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuba K, Koketsu K (1976) Decrease in Na-conductance during desensitization of the frog endplate. Nature 262:504–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DH, Spannbauer PM, Parsons RL (1977) Desensitization does not selectively alter sodium channels. Nature 268:553–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorković H, Tomanek RJ (1977) Potassium and chloride conductances in normal and denervated rat muscles. Am J Physiol 232:C109-C114

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeno T, Edwards C, Hashimura S (1970) Difference in effects on end-plate potentials between procaine and lidocaine as revealed by voltage-clamp experiments. J Neurophysiol 34:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Magazanik LG, Vyskočil F (1973) Desensitization at the motor endplate. In: Rang HP (ed) Drug receptors. McMillan, London, pp 105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Manalis RS, Werman R (1976) In: Reuben JP, Purpura DP, Bennett MVL, Kandel ER (eds) Electrobiology of nerve, synapse and muscle. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manthey AA (1966) The effect of calcium on the desensitization of membrane receptors at the neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol 49:963–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Manthey AA (1970) Further studies on the effect of calcium on the time course of action of carbamylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol 56:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastuk WL, Parsons RL (1970) Factors in the inactivation of postjunctional membrane receptors of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol 56:218–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher E, Sakmann B (1976) Noise analysis of drug induced voltage clamp currents in denervated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 258:705–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Rang HP, Ritter JM (1970) On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 6:357–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyskočil F (1975) Recovery of sensitivity to acetylcholine following desensitization in muscles of different vertebrate species. Pflügers Arch 361:83–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorković, H. Desensitization in denervated mouse muscles. Pflugers Arch. 391, 171–177 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596166

Key words

Navigation