Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific methods in archaeology

  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The foregoing account of the scientific work carried out in museum laboratories has of necessity been selective, since only a limited range of problems could be discussed. No reference has been made, for example, to the use of scientific methods in problems of authenticity. However the topics dealt with do show that the work involved is very varied, both as regards the nature of the problems-whether in the conservation or in the scientific examination of antiquities-and the methods used to solve these problems. This now constitutes a fascinating field of chemistry and physics in which the newest materials and techniques are being adapted to conserve and to examine the objects of past cultures. Also the concept of museum laboratories has become firmly established, and the spirit of co-operation between the archaeologist and the scientist is of mutual advantage. The archaeologist learns more about the technical aspects of his subject and is assured that the objects he excavates will be preserved by the best possible means. In return the scientist's horizon is broadened and his field of interest extended beyond the confines of his laboratory by the knowledge that his studies are correlated with the cultural development of mankind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caley, E. R.: J. Chem. Educ.28, 64 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Göbel, F.: Über den Einfluß der Chemie auf die Ermittelung der Völker der Vorzeit. Erlangen 1942.

  3. Wöcel, J.: Sitzber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Wien.11, 716 (1853);16, 169 (1855).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fellenberg, L. R.: Mitt. Naturforsch. Ges. Bern.43, 65, 153 (1860);41, 173 (1861);42, 1 (1862);43, 135 (1863);44, 122 (1864);45, 7 (1865);46, 261 (1866).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bibra, E.: Die Bronzen und Kupferlegierungen der alten und ältesten Völker mit Rücksicht auf jene der Neuzeit. Erlangen 1869.

  6. Rathgen, F.: Die Konservierung von Altertumsfunden. Berlin 1905.

  7. Werner, A. E.: Technical Notes, No. 218 (1961). Ciba (A.R.L.) Ltd.

  8. Organ, R. M.: Studies in Conservation4, 4 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mühlethaler, B.: Araldit bei der Erhaltung von Altertümern. Ciba Publ. Nr. 33870 und Nr. 34197/d. Basel 1966.

  10. Werner, A. E. Museums J.57, 3 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Organ, R. M. Studies in Conservation4 96 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franzen, A.: The Warship Wasa. Stockholm 1960.

  13. Werner, A. E.: Chronique d'Egypte33, 273 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gowers, H. J.: Museums J.58, 278 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Werner, A. E.:ibid.64, 5 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Organ, R. M.:ibid.55, 112 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Organ, R. M.: ibid.61, 2 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Madsen, H. B.: Studies in Conservation12, 163 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Organ, R. M., in: Application of Science in Examination of Works of Art, p. 126. Boston, Mass. Museum of Fine Arts 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Organ, R. M. in: Recent Advances in Conservation: Ed. byG. Thomson, p. 128. London: Butterworth 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plenderleith, H. J., in: Enkomi-Alasia. ByC. F. A. Schaeffer, p. 381. Paris: Klingsbeck 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Werner, A. E.: in: Application of Science in Examination of Works of Art. Museum of Fine Arts. Boston, Mass., p. 86 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barnett, R. D., andA. E., Werner: Brit. Mus. Quarterly32, 144 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Werner, A. E.: Anal. Chem.40, 28a (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Otto, H., andW. Witter: Handbuch der ältesten vorgeschichtlichen Metallurgie in Mitteleuropa. Leipzig 1952.

  26. Junghans, S., et al.: Metallanalysen Kupferzeitlicher u. Frühbronzezeitlicher Bodenfunde aus Europa. Berlin 1960.

  27. Richards, E. E. andK. F. Hartley: Nature185, 194 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sayre, E. V., andR. W. Smith: Science133, 1824 (1961); in: Archaeological Chemistry.Ed. byM. Levey, p. 279. University of Pennsylvania Press 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Renfrew, C., et al.: Proc. Prehist. Soc.32, 30 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brill, R. H., andJ. M. Wampler: Am. J. Archaeology71, 63 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chirnside, R. C., andP. H. C. Proffitt: J. Glass Studies5, 18 (1963); also Proc. VIIth Intern. Congr. Glass. Brussels 1965. No. 222, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brill, R. H.: Proc. VII th. Intern Congr. Glass. Brussels 1965. No. 223, p. 1.

  33. Aitken, M. J.: Physics and Archaeology. New York-London: Interscience Publ. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aitken, M. J. et al.: Nature219, 442 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, A.E. Scientific methods in archaeology. Naturwissenschaften 56, 385–392 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593613

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593613

Keywords

Navigation