Skip to main content
Log in

The value of in vitro ultrasonography in the intraoperative staging of gastric cancer

Blind study of 93 cases

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The correct staging is of crucial importance in the choice of surgical treatment in patients affected by stomach carcinoma. In an attempt to achieve a greater accuracy in the diagnosis of depth of tumor invasion, we propose to perform ultrasonography of the gastric wall during surgery (in vitro ultrasonography). Immediately after removal by the surgeon, the portion of the stomach containing the tumor is submitted to ultrasonography with a linear 7.5-MHz probe. To obtain good ultrasonographic images it was necessary to interpose an echo-free standoff pad between the probe and the gastric wall and between the latter and support surface. On completion of ultrasonography, the surgical specimen was sent to the pathologist, who was unaware of the diagnosis formulated on the basis of in vitro ultrasonography (VUS). The VUS diagnosis of T corresponded to the pathological diagnosis in 87/93 cases (93.5% accuracy). In the early cancers the diagnosis was correct in 24/28 cases (85.7%); in the advanced cancers the diagnosis was correct in 63/65 cases (96.9%). In comparison with the results of the other preoperative and intraoperative techniques the accuracy of in vitro ultrasonography in diagnosing the depth of tumor invasion was clearly superior. We feel that VUS may become a basic instrument in T staging and an aid to the surgeon in deciding the extent of the resection and of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolondi L, Casanova P, Santi V, Caletti GC, Barbara L, Labò G (1986) Sonographic appearance of the normal gastric wall: an in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol 12: 991–998

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Manzoni G, Cordiano C (1990) Intraoperative staging in gastric cancer surgery. In: Reed PI, Carboni M, Johnston B, Guadagni S (eds) New trends in gastric cancer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Manzoni G, Borzellino G, Macrì A, Cordiano C (1991) La stadiazione intraoperatoria del T nel cancro gastrico. Arch ed Atti 93esimo Congresso S.I.C. 5: 306–312

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fracastoro G, de Manzoni G, Mazzeo GI, Macrì A (1991) Staging of gastric cancer and surgical choices. In: Cordiano C, de Manzoni G (eds) Staging and treatment of gastric cancer. Piccin, Padova, pp 190–198

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (1987) UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumours. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hiki Y, Kida M (1991) Preoperative staging of T by endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing the degree of gastric cancer invasion. In: Cordiano C, de Manzoni G (eds) Staging and treatment of gastric cancer. Piccin, Padova, pp 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  7. JRSGC (1981) The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg 11: 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kodama I, Machi J, Tanaka M, Yoshida C, Hashimoto K, Takeda J, Kakegawa T, Sigel B (1992) The value of operative ultrasonography in diagnosing tumor extension of carcinoma of the stomach. Surg Gyn Obstet 172: 479–484

    Google Scholar 

  9. Machi J, Takeda J, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Fujita H, Kuroiji T, Yamashita Y (1987) The detection of gastric and esophageal tumour extension by high resolution ultrasound during surgery. World J Surg 11: 664–671

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maruyama K (1986) Results of surgery correlated with staging. In: Preece PE, Cuschieri A, Wellwood JM (eds) Cancer of the stomach. Grune & Stratton, London, pp

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miyamoto Y, Nakatani M, Ida M, Takashi I, Ocazawa N, Ariizumi M, Tsujimoto F, Mizunuma K, Fukuda Y, Tada S, Chiba S (1989) Ultrasonographic findings in gastric cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies. JCU 17: 309–318

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sussman SK, Halvorsen RA, Illescas FF, Cohan RA, Saeed M, Silverman PM, Thompson WM, Meyers WC (1988) Gastric adenocarcinoma CT versus surgical staging, Radiology 167: 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tio TL, Coene PPLO, Schouwink MH, Tytgat GNJ (1989) Esophagogastric carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology 167: 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  14. Valette JP, Souquet JC, Lambert R, Bret P (1988) L'echoendoscopie: ses indications en pathologie oesophagienne et gastrique. J Radio 69: 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yasuda K, Kiyota K, Nakajima M, Kawai K (1987) Fundamentals of endoscopic laser therapy (ELT) for G.I. tumours. New aspects with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Endoscopy 19: 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yasuda K, Nakajima M, Cho E, Kobajashi M, Kawai K (1987) Benign versus malignant gastric ulcers: a role of endoscopic ultrasonography. In: Dancygier H, Classen M (eds) 5th International symposium on endoscopic ultrasonography. Demeter-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida S, Miyamato K, Hijikata A (1990) Endosonography: its diagnostic utilities for gastric cancer. In: Reed PI, Carboni M, Johnston B, Guadagni S (eds) New trends in gastric cancer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zeitz M, Riecken ED (1990) Preoperative staging of gastrointestinal tumours by endosonography. Surg Endosc 4: 154–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Manzoni, G., Macrì, A., Borzellino, G. et al. The value of in vitro ultrasonography in the intraoperative staging of gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 8, 765–769 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593437

Key Words

Navigation