Skip to main content
Log in

The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been increasing concern in the medical, business, and insurance communities and government agencies about the rising cost of health care. Since 1980 the cost of medical care has increased from $280 billion dollars per year to $670 billion dollars in 1990, and was estimated at $900 billion in 1993. Several factors have contributed to this increase, including the high cost of hospitalization and new expensive technology, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This present cost analysis was undertaken to determine the cost variables in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to see if changes in physician, nursing, and administration work activities could decrease the cost of hospitalization. Fifty-four patients who had an uncomplicated elective cholecystectomy during a five-month period in 1993 were assessed in terms of cost components of hospitalization, including nursing unit labor costs, surgery personnel labor costs, supply/instrument cost, and ancillary costs. Nine general surgeons participated in this study, four of whom accounted for 71% of the annual volume of cases. This analysis was performed with the help of Baxter Corporate Consulting, a Division of Baxter Healthcare Corporation. From this study, it was found that the average cost for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients was $1589±$223. The operating room and supply/instrument component costs were the two largest expenses, accounting for 42% of the total cost. Reimbursement from various insurance agencies were also evaluated, and it was determined that a contract made with a local HMO caused the hospital to lose an average of $443.00 per patient. Instrument cost was evaluated, showing that the surgeons who used disposable instruments had an average instrument cost of $806±$63 per case, whereas those using reusable products had an average cost of $303 per case. (A reprocessing cost of $200 was also added when reusable instruments were used. This included the cost of cleaning, repairs, and labor costs for this equipment.) The cost of disposable and reusable products was evaluated in terms of the initial purchase price, replacement charges, equipment maintenance charges, and labor costs for cleaning, repackaging and inspection, sterilization, and quality control. A second factor identified was that patients directed to an inpatient nursing unit incurred an average direct nursing labor cost of $124, whereas the cost was only $54 when the patient went to an out-patient unit. A third observation demonstrated that the operating room time averaged 203 min±31 min, and the length of the operative procedure accounted for only 96 min±20 min of the total operating room time. From this data it appears that, in hospitals with more than 300 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases per year, the costs of using reusable and disposable instruments is similar. Time/motion studies in the operating room have also been instituted, along with changes in postoperative physician orders, to decrease the cost of the hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burner ST, Waldo DR, McKusich DR (1992) National health expenditures projections through 2030. Health Care Finance Rev 14(1): 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eiseman B, Borlase BC (1978) Measurement of cost effectiveness. In: Eiseman B, Stahlgren L (eds) Cost effective surgical practice. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ginzberg E (1990) High-tech medicine and rising health care costs. JAMA 263(13): 1820–1822

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan AM (1991) Hospital charges for laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies. JAMA 266(24): 3425

    Google Scholar 

  5. McIntyre RC, Foster MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM (1992) A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 143–148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peters JH, Ellison L, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LL (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reichert M (1993) Laparoscopic instruments. AORN J 57(3): 637–655

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schieber GJ, Poulhir JP, Greenwald LM (1992) U.S. health expenditure performance: an international comparison and data update. Health Care Finance Rev 13(4): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Position statement report on transmission of microorganisms (1993) Gastrointestinal Endosc 36(6): 885–888

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacFadyen, B.V., Lenz, S. The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 8, 748–752 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593433

Key words

Navigation