Neuroradiology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 56–61 | Cite as

Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation

  • F. Nüssel
  • H. Wegmüller
  • P. Huber
Originals

Summary

10 patients with an AVM of the brain were examined by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional cerebral angiography (CCA). From MRA in 7/10 patients important information about vascular supply could be provided; in 3 patients, all with small AVM's it could be only suspected. CCA revealed the vascularisation of the AVM's in all patients and showed additional hemodynamic aspects better than MRA. With MRI in all cases the AVM could be diagnosed, but only the involvement of the main cerebral vessels could be demonstrated; however, MRI is superior to MRA and CCA in showing the nidus and the involved brain structures.

Key words

Arteriovenous malformation MRT MRA Angiography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Spetzler RF, Martin NA (1986) A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65: 476–483Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi YQ, Chen YC (1986) A proposed scheme for grading intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65: 484–489Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noorbehesht B, Fabrikant JI, Enzmann DR (1987) Size determination of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations by MR, CT and angiography. Neuroradiology 29: 512–518Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith HJ, Strother CM, Kikuchi Y et al. (1988) MR imaging in the management of supratentorial intracranial AVM's. AJNR 9: 225–235Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schörner W, Bradac GB, Treich J, Bender A, Felix R (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous angiomas. Neuroradiology 28: 313–318Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kucharczyk W, Lemme-Pleghos S, Uske A, Brandt-Zawadzkj M, Dooms G, Norman D (1985) Intracranial vascular malformations: MR and CT imaging. Neuroradiology 156: 383–389Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Le Blanc R, Levesque M, Comair Y, Ethier R (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 21: 15–20Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laub GA, Kaiser WA (1988) MR angiography with gradient motion rephasing. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 377–382Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Axel L, Shima Kawa A, Mac Fall J (1986) A time-of-flight method of measuring flow velocity by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 4: 199–205Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, Wagle W (1989) Threedimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 9: 139–149Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wehrli FW, Shimahawa A, Gullberg GT, McFall JR (1988) Time-of-flight MR flow imaging: selective saturation recovery with gradient refocusing. Radiology 160: 781–785Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle HP et al. (1989) Intracerebral arteriovenous malformation: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography. Radiology 173: 831–837Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Needell WM, Maravilla KR (1988) MR flow imaging in vascular malformations using gradient recalled acquisition. AJNR 9: 637–642Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norman D (1986) Vascular disease: hemorrhage. In: Brant-Zawadzki M, Norman D (eds) Magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system. Raven Press, New York, pp 209–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Nüssel
    • 1
  • H. Wegmüller
    • 1
  • P. Huber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeuroradiologyInselspitalBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations