Skip to main content
Log in

132-hydroxy-bacteriopheophorbidea-methylester pharmacokinetics in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma

  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photosensitiser 132-hydroxy bacteriopheophorbide a-methylester (132-OH-BPME) is characterised by a high absorption coefficient at the far red wavelength 750 nm and a good singlet oxygen quantum yield. The pharmacokinetics of 132-OH-BPME was studied on the Lewis lung carcinoma in mice after i.v. administration of 5 mg/kg body weight at different incubation intervals. The accumulation dye was chemically extracted from selected tissues and the concentrations were measured by absorption spectroscopy. The parenchymatous organs, liver, spleen and kidney, showed maximum 132-OH-BPME concentrations after 2 h incubation (liver, spleen) and 4 h postinjection (kidney). A high uptake was detected in the lung with the maximum concentration at 2 h. The malignant tissue accumulated high 132-OH-BPME concentrations at 2–12 h postinjection with peaking at 8 h. The 132-OH-BPME concentrations in muscle tissue, representing the normal tumour surroundings, and in the skin were very low. The results of our study suggest that photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 132-OH-BPME could be effective at an incubation time of about 8 h postsensitiser injection, when the tumour 132-OH-BPME concentration has reached its maximum and the muscle and skin concentrations are at a minimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bown S, Tralau C, Coleridge S et al. Photodynamic therapy with porphyrin and phthalocyanine sensitisation: quantitative studies in normal rat liver. Br J Cancer 1986; 54:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan W, Marshall J, Svenson J et al. Effect of sulfonation on the cell and tissue distribution of the photosensitizer aluminium phthalocyanine. Cancer Res 1990; 50:4533–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moser J, Herchenbach B, Evenschor K et al. Biotechnology of bacteriopheophorbides,'naturally occurring second generation photosensitizers. Laser in Med Sci 1992; 7:272

    Google Scholar 

  4. Röder B, Dressler C, Hagemann R et al. On the pharmacokinetics of 132-hydroxybacteriopheophorbide a methylester studied by fluorescence spectroscopy on Lewis lung carcinoma bearing mice. SPIE 1994; 2078:427–37

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iwai K, Kimura S. Efficiency of pheophorbide dimer in photodynamic therapy of mouse tumour. J Clin Biochem Nutr 1988; 5:145–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richter A. Characterization of benzoporphyrine derivatives, a new photosensitizer. SPIE 1988; 997:132–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yano T, Uozumi T, Kawamoto K et al. Photodynamic therapy for rat pituitary tumour in vitro and in vivo using pheophorbide a and white light. Laser Surg Med 1991; 11:174–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reddi E, Castro G, Biolo R et al. Pharmacokinetic studies with zinc 11 phthalocyanine in tumour-bearing mice. Br J Cancer 1987; 56:597–600

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ismail, M.S., Dressler, C., Roder, B. et al. 132-hydroxy-bacteriopheophorbidea-methylester pharmacokinetics in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma. Laser Med Sci 13, 78–81 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00592963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00592963

Keywords

Navigation