Skip to main content
Log in

Observations on the polarity of mutant Drosophila follicles lacking the oocyte

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Homozygous females of the mutantsegalitarian andBicaudal-D R26produce follicles in which the oocyte is replaced by an additional nurse cell. Normal morphological markers for polarity can be identified in mutant follicles but the normal spatial organization of these markers is disturbed. For example, nurse-cell nuclei of different ploidy classes are present but, contrary to wild-type follicles, the nuclei show no anteroposterior ploidy gradient. The two cells with four intercellular bridges, one of which should have developed into the oocyte rather than a nurse cell, are located at the posterior pole only in young follicles (up to about stage 5), whereas during later stages they are more often found at lateral or intermediate positions. This disturbed polarity correlates with a variable aberrant pattern of extracellular ionic currents. Moreover, in the mutant follicles patches of columnar follicular epithelium differentiate locally although this type of epithelium forms normally only around the oocyte. The follicle cells at both follicle poles possess anterior quality since they migrate from both poles towards the centre of the follicle, as do the border cells restricted to the anterior pole in wild-type follicles. Our analysis indicates that in the mutants the follicular polarity is normal at first but becomes disturbed during stages 5 to 6. The secondary breakdown of polarity is likely to follow on from the absence of the oocyte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohrmann J (1991) Potassium uptake intoDrosophila ovarian follicles: relevance to physiological and developmental processes. J Insect Physiol 37:937–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrmann J, Sander K (1987) Aberrant oogenesis in the patterning mutantdicephalic ofDrosophila melanogaster: time-lapse recordings and volumetry in vitro. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 196:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrmann J, Dorn A, Sander K, Gutzeit H (1986a) The extracellutar electrical current pattern and its variability in vitellogenicDrosophila follicles. J Cell Sci 81:189–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrmann J, Huebner E, Sander K, Gutzeit H (1986b) Intracellular electrical potential measurements inDrosophila follicles. J Cell Sci 81:207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrmann J, Kiefer G, Sander K (1986c) Inverse correlation between mean nuclear DNA content and cell number in nurse cell clusters ofDrosophila. Chromosoma 94:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennhöfer L (1982) Cytophotometric DNA determinations and autoradiographic studies in salivary gland nuclei from larvae with different karyotypes inDrosophila melanogaster. Chromesoma 26:123–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey A, Gutzeit H (1986) Follicle cells and germ line cells both affect polarity indicephalic chimeric follicles ofDrosophila. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey A, Sander K, Gutzeit H (1984) The spatial arrangement of germ line cells in ovarian follicles of the mutantdicephalic inDrosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 193:388–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Gateff E (1982) Gonial cell neoplasm of genetic origin affecting both sexes ofDrosophila melanogaster. In: Burger MM, Weber R (eds) Embryonic development, part B. Cellular aspects. Liss, New York, pp 621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill K (1963) Developmental genetic studies on oogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool 152:251–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO (1990) The microfilament pattern in the somatic follicle cells of mid-vitellogenic ovarian follicles ofDrosophila. Eur J Cell Biol 53:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO, Sander K (1985) Establishment of polarity in the insect egg. In: Metz CB, Monroy A (eds) Biology of fertilization, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 347–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO, Strauß A (1989) Follicle cell development is partly independent of germ-line cell differentiation inDrosophila oogenesis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 198:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond MP, Laird CD (1985) Chromosome structure and DNA replication in nurse and follicle cells ofDrosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 91:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig G (1935) Die Vielwertigkeit der Speicheldrüsenkerne und -chromosomen beiDrosophila melanogaster. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererb Lehre 70:496–501

    Google Scholar 

  • King RC (1970) Ovarian development inDrosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch EA, Smith PA, King RC (1967) The division and differentiation ofDrosophila cystocytes. J Morphol 124:143–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohs-Schardin M (1982)Dicephalic - aDrosophila mutant affecting polarity in oogenesis and embryogenesis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 191:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaritis LH (1985) Structure and physiology of the egg shell. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LJ (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 153–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler J, Wieschaus EF (1986) Dominant maternal-effect mutations ofDrosophila melanogaster causing the production of double -abdomen embryos. Genetics 112:803–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall R, Jaffe LF (1985) Patterns of ionic current throughDrosophila follicles and eggs. Dev Biol 108:102–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach T (1987) Germ line and soma cooperate during oogenesis to establish the dorsoventral pattern of egg shell and embryo inDrosophila melanogaster. Cell 49:699–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach T, Wieschaus E (1991) Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster: II. Mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology. Genetics 129:1119–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Storto PD, King RC (1988) Multiplicity of functions for theotu gene product duringDrosophila oogenesis. Dev Genet 9:91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter B, Steward R (1991) Requirement for phosphorylation and localization of theBicaudal-D protein inDrosophila oocyte differentiation. Cell 67:917–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter B, Romberg LM, Steward R (1989)Bicaudal-D, aDrosophila gene involved in developmental asymmetry: localized transcript accumulation in ovaries and sequence similarity to myosin heavy chain tail domains. Genes Dev 3:1957–1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel F, Gutzeit HO, Zissler D (1990) Morphogenesis of the micropylar apparatus in ovarian follicles of the fungus gnatBradysia tritici (syn.Sciara ocellaris). Roux's Arch Dev Biol 199:146–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton RP, Struhl G (1989) Structure of theDrosophila Bicaudal-D protein and its role in localizing the posterior determinantnanos. Cell 59:881–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Marsh JL, Gehring WJ (1978)fs(1)K10, a germ-line dependent female-sterile mutation causing abnormal chorion morphology in Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 184:75–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohrmann, J., Frey, A. & Gutzeit, H.O. Observations on the polarity of mutant Drosophila follicles lacking the oocyte. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 201, 268–274 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00592107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00592107

Key words

Navigation