Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic hernia repair

An experimental study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is becoming an increasingly common procedure. The possible creation of intraperitoneal adhesions during laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has not been examined. For the transperitoneal hernia repair to be an acceptable option, the hypothesis that this approach will incite significant adhesions must be rejected. To test this hypothesis, 21 pigs underwent laparoscopic herniorrhaphy using a standard procedure with the implantation of a polypropylene mesh graft on one side while a sham procedure was performed on the other. These animals were later examined laparoscopically for adhesion formation and the condition of the graft. None of the 21 animals developed adhesions to the trocar sites, 12 animals developed adhesions to the area of the polypropylene mesh, and 3 developed adhesions to the side of the sham procedure. There were no adhesions involving the small intestine. It is therefore concluded that the hypothesis should be rejected and that laparoscopic herniorrhaphy does not incite significant adhesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conolly WB, Stephens FO (1968) Factors influencing the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions: An experimental study. Surgery 63: 976–979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis E (1971) The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gyecol Obstet 133: 497–511

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis H (1978) Wound repair — reaction of the peritoneum to injury. Ann R Coll Surg 60: 219–221

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis H (1980) Internal overhealing: The problem of intraperitoneal adhesions. World J Surg 4: 303–306

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis H (1982) The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions. Br J Surg 69: 241–243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mage G, Pouly J-L, de Joliniere JB, Chabrand S, Riouallon A, Bruhat M-A (1986) A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertil Steril 46: 807–810

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menzies D, Ellis H (1991) The role of plasminogen activator in adhesion prevention. Surg Gyecol Obstet 172: 362–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Leary DP, Coakley JB (1992) The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74: 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robbins GF, Brunschwig A, Foote FW (1949) Deperitonealization: Clinical and experimental observations. Ann Surg 130: 466–479

    Google Scholar 

  10. Souttar HS (1925) Acute intestinal obstruction. Br Med J 2: 1000–1001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weibel M-A, Majno G (1973) Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. Am J Surg 126: 345–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eller, R., Twaddell, C., Poulos, E. et al. Abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 8, 181–184 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591826

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591826

Key words

Navigation