Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between the 21-gauge Urocut needle and the 21-gauge Surecut needle in echo-guided percutaneous biopsy of neoplastic liver lesions

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fine cutting needles for histology are now widely used in echo-guided biopsies of various organs. In this study we compared the results obtained in the biopsy of neoplastic hepatic lesions using two different 21-gauge cutting needles: Trucut needle (Urocut) and a modified Menghini needle (Surecut). Eighty-five patients with primary or metastatic hepatic neoplasms were biopsied with a Urocut needle and a further 85 patients underwent biopsy with a Surecut needle. The two groups were comparable for size and nature of hepatic neoplasms. The Urocut needle provided a much higher percentage of diagnostic material than the Surecut needle (94.8% vs 70.5%) regardless of the primary or metastatic nature of the lesion or its size. The diagnostic accuracy was only identical for both needles (91.3% for Urocut vs 91.5% for Surecut) whenever the diagnostic material was compared in cases in which both types of needles had been used to take the biopsy specimens. There were no complications in either of the two groups studied. Given the smaller incidence of non-diagnostic biopsies with the Urocut needle, we consider that this needle should be preferred in echo-guided biopsies of neoplastic hepatic lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernardino ME (1984) Percutaneous biopsy. AJR 142: 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erwin BC, Brynes RK, Chan WC (1986) Percutaneous needle biopsy in the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma. Cancer 57: 1074–1078

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall-Craggs MA, Lees WR (1986) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: pancreatic and biliary tumors. AJR 147: 399–403

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall-Craggs MA, Lees WR (1987) Fine-needle biopsy: cytology, histology or both? Gut 28: 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haubek A (1985) Puncture of focal liver lesions. In: Holm HH, Kristensen JK (eds) Interventional ultrasound. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isler RJ, Ferrucci JT, Wittemberg J (1981) Tissue core biopsy of abdominal tumors with a 22 gauge cutting needle. AJR 136: 725–728

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lees WR, Hall-Craggs MA, Manhire AR (1985) Five years experience of fine needle aspiration biopsy: 454 consecutive cases. Clin Radiol 36: 517–520

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lieberman RP, Hafez GR, Crummy AB (1982) Histology from aspiration biopsy: Turner needle experience. AJR 138: 561–564

    Google Scholar 

  9. Limberg B, Hopker WW, Kommerell B (1987) Histologic differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions by ultrasonically guided fine needle biopsy. Gut 28: 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  10. Livraghi T, Pilotti S, Ravetto C, Sangalli G, Solbiati L (1985) Inclusion-cytology versus smear-cytology in fine needle abdominal biopsy. Eur J Radiol 5: 111–114

    Google Scholar 

  11. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G (1986) Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy: a multicenter retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol 2: 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riska H, Friman C (1985) Fatality after fine needle aspiration biopsy of liver (letter). Br J Med 1: 517

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwerk WB, Durr HK, Schmitz-Moormann P (1983) Ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsies in pancreatic and hepatic neoplasms. Gastrointest Radiol 8: 219–225

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherlock S, Dick R, Van Leeuwen DJ (1984) Liver biopsy today. The Royal Free Hospital experience. J Hepatol 1: 75–85

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith EH (1984) The hazards of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 11: 629–634

    Google Scholar 

  16. Solmi L, Gandolfi L, Muratori R, Leo P, Bacchini P (1987) Echo-guided fine-needle biopsy of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 82: 744–748

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spamer C, Brambs HJ, Koch HK, Gerok W (1986) Benign circumscribed lesions of the liver diagnosed by ultrasonically guided fine needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 14: 83–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki T, Shibuya H, Yoshimatsu S, Suzuki S (1987) Ultrasonically guided staging splenic tissue core biopsy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer 60: 879–882

    Google Scholar 

  19. Torp-Pedersen S, Gronvall S, Holm HH (1984) Ultrasonically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of gastrointestinal mass lesions. J Ultrasound Med 3: 65–68

    Google Scholar 

  20. Torp-Pedersen S, Juul N, Vyberg M (1984) Histological sampling with a 23 gauge modified Menghini needle. Br J Radiol 57: 151–154

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solmi, L., Muratori, R., Brambati, M. et al. Comparison between the 21-gauge Urocut needle and the 21-gauge Surecut needle in echo-guided percutaneous biopsy of neoplastic liver lesions. Surg Endosc 3, 38–41 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591314

Key words

Navigation