Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 8, Issue 10, pp 1198–1201 | Cite as

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in complicated cholelithiasis

  • J. M. Fabre
  • H. Fagot
  • J. Domergue
  • F. Guillon
  • M. Balmes
  • C. Zaragosa
  • H. Baumel
Original Articles

Abstract

From January 1990 to December 1992, 129 patients presenting complicated cholelithiasis were included in a prospective study to assess the feasibility and efficiency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were 84 females (65%) and 45 males (35%). Mean age was 60 years (range from 23 to 88). There were 90 acute cholecystitis (70%), 14 empyema (11%), 14 cholecystitis on scleroatrophic gallbladder (11%), and 11 mucocele (9%) cases. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been successfully performed in 106 cases (82%)(group I). In this group of patients, morbidity and mortality were 4.7% and 0.9% (n=1), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 4.7 days after uneventful postoperative course. Two patients required reoperation for complications (1.8%). Twenty-three patients (18%) required enforced conversion to laparotomy after unsuccessful laparoscopic procedure (group II). Mean hospital stay was significantly higher in group II (10.8 days,P=0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups according to sex, previous surgery, or indications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be attempted and successfully realized in complicated cholelithiasis without morbidity increase. Main advantages of this procedure are a shorter hospital stay and a better recovery period.

Key words

Complicated cholelithiasis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Morbidity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161: 355–360Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron JL, Gadacz TR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1: 1–2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Domergue J, Fabre JM, De Seguin Ch, Lepage B, Baumel H (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and non-acute cholecystolithiasis. Res Surg 3: 147–149Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edlung G, Ljungdahl M (1990) Acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 159: 414–416Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabre JM, Prezmyslaw P, De Seguin Ch, Lepage B, Balmes M, Baumel H, Domergue J (1992) Evaluation of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patients with simple and complicated cholecystolithiasis. World J Surg 16: 113–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fabre JM, Fagot H, Domergue J, Guillon F, Lepage B, De Seguin Ch, Balmes M, Baumel H (1992) Cholecystectomie coelioscopique dans la lithiase vesiculaire simple et compliquee à propos de 392 cas. Ann Chir 46: 330–334Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–216Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flowers JL, Bailey R, Scovill WA, Zucker KA (1991) The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 161: 388–392Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franklin ME, Vancaillie TG, Daniel C (1992) Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy applicable to patients with acute cholecystitis? J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 159–163Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gutman C (1990) Changing trends in surgery for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 14: 567–570Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hermann RE (1990) Surgery for acute and chronic cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am 70: 1263–1275Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles R (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Surgery 163: 221–226Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 339–344Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 8–12Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217: 233–236Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sackier JM, Berci G, Phillips E, Carroll B, Shapiro S, PazPartlow M (1991) The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126: 1021–1026Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. New Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Testas P, Chollet JM, De Watteville JC (1990) Essai d'évaluation de la cholecystectomie par abord coelioscopique. A propos de 2266 malades. Chirurgie 116: 844–847Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trede M, Schaupp W (1990) Support for cholecystectomy — the “gold standard” of gallstone therapy. Chirurg 61: 365–369Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varma JS, King PM (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. Br Med J 305: 394–396Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Voyles CR, Petro AB, Meena AL, Haick AJ, Koury AM (1991) A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 365–370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Fabre
    • 1
  • H. Fagot
    • 1
  • J. Domergue
    • 1
  • F. Guillon
    • 1
  • M. Balmes
    • 1
  • C. Zaragosa
    • 1
  • H. Baumel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil DigestifMontpellier CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations