Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic colon surgery in a rat model

A preliminary report

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of laparoscopic colectomy on immune function require further study. Because the rat has been widely used to investigate the immune system we studied the feasibility of laparoscopic sutured colon anastomoses in a rat model. We used a low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum, a 2.7-mm 30° wide-angle arthroscope and video system, and microotologic forceps and scissors to perform two-handed dissection and suturing of the rat colon. The procedures included laparoscopic division of the colon and colostomy (group A,n=3), laparoscopic closure of a colotomy (group B,n=4), and complete laparoscopic division and reanastomosis of the colon (group C,n=4). One anesthetic death occurred in group C. Necropsy performed 1–15 days postoperatively revealed no anastomotic leaks and two anastomotic strictures. Laparoscopic sutured colon anastomosis in the rat is feasible and may provide a new model for the physiologic study of laparoscopic colon surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berguer R, Gutt CN, Stiegmann GV (1993) Laparoscopic surgery in the rat: description of a new technique. Surg Endosc 7: 345–347

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkenbosch F, Wolvers DA, Derijk R (1991) Neuroendocrine and immunological mechanisms in stress-induced immunomodulation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 40: 639–647

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper GM, Scoggins AM, Ward ID, Murphy D (1982) Laparoscopy: a stressful procedure. Anaesthesia 37: 266–269

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falk PM, Beart R Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons R Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Filmar S, Gomel V, McComb PF (1987) Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on post-operative adhesion formation in the rat model. Fertil Steril 48: 486–489

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flecknell, PA (1987) Laboratory animal anesthesia. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Caballero M, Vara-Thorbeck C (1993) The evolution of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study with conventional cholecystectomy and sympathetic blockade treatment. Surg Endosc 7: 416–419

    Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith J, Everitt N, Curley P, McMahon M (1993) Laparoscopic versus “open” cholecystectomy—reduced influence upon immune function and the acute phase response. Surg Endosc 7: 123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harmon G, Senagore A, Kilbride M, Luchtefeld M, MacKeigan J, Warzynski M (1993) Cortisol and IL-6 response attenuated following laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 121

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill ADK, Banwell PE, Querechi A, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A, Monson JRT, Guillou PJ (1993) IL-6 response in laparoscopic versus open herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 7: 232

    Google Scholar 

  11. Houdart R, Lavergne A, Galian A, Hautefeuille P (1983) [Anatomo-pathological evolution of single-layer end-to-end digestive anastomoses. A study of 210 colonic anastomoses in rats from the 2nd to the 180th day]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 7: 465–473

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khansari DN, Murgo AJ, Faith RE (1990) Effects of stress on the immune system. Immunol Today 11: 170–175

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koruda MJ, Rolandelli RH (1990) Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res 48: 504–515

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munday C, McGinn FP (1976) A comparison of polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures in rat colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg 63: 870–872

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG (1992) Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril 57: 1180–1185

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIH (1993) National Institutes of Health consensus development conference on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 390–398

    Google Scholar 

  17. Papalois B, Antoniou P, Athanasiades C, Pappas D, Papdopoulou M, Vlachos J, Alexiou G (1993) Comparison of surgical stress in laparoscopic and “open” cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 214

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rademaker BM, Ringers J, Odoom JA, de Wit LT, Kalkman CJ, Ossting J (1992) Pulmonary function and stress response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison with subcostal incision and influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 75: 381–385

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trueblood HW, Nelsen TS, Kohatsy S, Oberhelman HA (1969) Wound healing in the colon: comparison of inverted and everted closures. Surgery 65: 919–930

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berguer, R., Gutt, C.N. Laparoscopic colon surgery in a rat model. Surg Endosc 8, 1195–1197 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591049

Key words

Navigation