Advertisement

Light diffraction patterns and sarcomere length variation in striated muscle fibers ofLimulus

  • Kevin Burton
  • Ronald J. Baskin
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Summary

Light diffraction patterns produced byLimulus striated muscle fibers were examined. Segments of fibers were glycerinated, fixed or bathed in relaxing solution. Profiles of the intensity of a diffracted order vs. the angle of incidence of the laser beam often exhibited narrow peaks with the fiber at rest length. The incident angles at which the intensity of left and right orders is greatest are used to calculate the sarcomere length, supporting the notion that regions of the fiber are organised into Bragg reflecting planes. These profiles developed subpeaks and broadened upon stretch of the fiber. The broad angle scan profiles are suggested to result from a decrease in the regular packing of myofibrils as the fiber is lengthened. The angular width of the subpeaks is used to estimate the thickness of clusters of myofibrils. The variation in sarcomere length along the fiber, as determined by the 0th to 1st diffraction order spacing, was dependent upon the fiber preparation. Glycerinated fibers and those bathed in relaxing solution showed more variation than fixed fibers. The variation of sarcomere length is compared to the variation in thick filament lengths inLimulus reported by Dewey et al. (1982) lengths inLimulus reported by Dewey et al. (1982). These results are compared to those obtained from frog fiber segments.

Key words

Muscle Laser diffraction Limulus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskin RJ, Lieber RL, Oba T, Yeh Y (1981) Intensity of light diffraction from striated muscle as a function of incident angle. Biophys J 36:759–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin RJ, Burton K, Yeh Y, Corcoran M (1983) Light diffraction studies ofLimulus muscle fibers. Biophys J 41:32aGoogle Scholar
  3. Betz W, Sakmann B (1973) Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol 230:673–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleworth DR, Edman KAP (1972) Changes in sarcomere length during isometric tension development in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 227:1–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Villafranca GW, Marschhaus CE (1963) Contraction of the A band. J Ultra Res 9:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidheiser S, Levine R, Davies R (1982) Two different fiber types inLimulus telson mucle. Fed Proc 41:1522Google Scholar
  7. Dewey M, Blasie K, Levine R, Colflesh D (1972) Changes in A-band structure during shortening of a paramyosin-containing striated muscle. Biophys J 12:82aGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey M, Levine R, Coleflesh D (1973) Structure ofLimulus striated muscle. The contractile apparatus at various sarcomere lengths. J Cell Biol 58:574–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey M, Colflesh D, Brink P, Fan S-F, Gaylinn B, Gural N (1982) Structural, functional, and chemical changes in the contractile apparatus ofLimulus striated muscle as a function of sarcomere shortening and tension development. In: Twarog B, Levine R, Dewey M (eds) Basic biology of muscles: a comparative approach. Raven Press, New York, pp 53–72Google Scholar
  10. Dewey M, Brink P, Colflesh DE, Gaylinn B, Fan S-F, Anapol F (1984)Limulus striated muscle provides an unusual model for muscle contraction. In: Pollack G, Sugi H (eds) Contractile mechanisms in muscle (Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 170). Plenum Press, New York, p 93Google Scholar
  11. Fourtner C, Sherman R (1972) A light and electron microscopic examination of muscles in the walking legs of the horseshoe crab,Limulus polyphemus (L). Can J Zool 50:1447–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franzini-Armstrong C (1970) Natural variability in the length of thin and thick filaments in single fibres from a crab,Portunas depurator. J Cell Sci 6:559–592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujime S (1984) An intensity expression of optical diffraction from striated muscle fibers. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 5:577–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huxley AF Peachey LD (1961) The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate striated muscle. J Physiol 156:150–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huxley AF (1980) Reflections on muscle. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, pp 60–61Google Scholar
  16. Kawai M, Kuntz I (1973) Optical diffraction studies of muscle fibers. Biophys J 13:857–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leung Af (1982) Laser diffraction of single intact cardiac muscle cells at rest. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 3:399–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leung AF (1983) Determination of myofibrillar diameter by light diffractometry. Pflügers Arch 396:238–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leung AF (1984) Fine structures in the light diffraction pattern of striated muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 5:535–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieber RL, Yeh Y, Baskin RJ (1984) Sarcomere length determination using laser diffraction: the effect of beam and fiber diameter. Biophys J 45:1007–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paolini PJ, Sabbadini R, Roos KP, Baskin RJ (1976) Sarcomere length dispersion in single skeletal muscle fibers and fiber bundles. Biophys J 16:919–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rome E (1967) Light and X-ray diffraction studies of the filament lattice of glycerol-extracted rabbit psoas muscle. J Mol Biol 27:591–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1979a) Do laser diffraction studies on striated muscle indicate stepwise sarcomere shortening? Nature 278:573–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1979b) Interpretation of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle as Bragg reflexion of light by the lattice of contractile proteins. J Physiol 290:317–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F (1980) Efficiency of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle fibers under stretch und during isometric contraction. Biophys J 30:507–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandow A (1936) Diffraction patterns of the frog sartorius and sarcomere behavior under stretch. J Cell Comp Physiol 9:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundell CL, Goldman YE, Peachey LD (1985) Microstructure in near-field and far-field laser diffraction patterns of muscle fibers. Biophys J 47:383aGoogle Scholar
  28. Tameyasu T, Ishide N, Pollack GH (1982) Discrete sarcomere length distribution in skeletal muscle. Biophys J 37:489–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walcott B, Dewey M (1980) Length-tension relation inLimulus striated muscle. J Cell Biol 87:204–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wray J, Vibert P, Cohen C (1974) Cross-bridge arrangements inLimulus muscle. J Mol Biol 88:343–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh Y, Baskin RJ, Lieber RL, Roos KP (1980) Theory of light diffraction by single skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J 29:509–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Burton
    • 1
  • Ronald J. Baskin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Biophysics Graduate GroupUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations