Neuroradiology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 42–47 | Cite as

Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography

  • G. Wilms
  • H. Bosmans
  • G. Marchal
  • P. Demaerel
  • J. Goffin
  • C. Plets
  • A. L. Baert
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Abstract

We compared magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the study of brain tumours and assessed the utility of gadolinium-enhanced MRA. We studied 17 patients with supratentorial brain tumors. The entire brain was imaged with multiple overlapping thin volume acquisitions. After IV injection of gadolinium-DTPA, a single thick-slab MRA acquisition was performed. Standard three-dimensional (3D-TOF) acquisitions (in six patients) and 3D-TOF with magnetization transfer prepulse and tilted optimisation nonsaturing radiofrequency excitation pulses (in 11 patients) were used. Displacement of the anterior cerebral artery, main stem and insular branches of the middle cerebral artery was seen well on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRA. Displacement of the lenticulostriate and anterior choroidal arteries was seen only once, after Gadolinium. Tumour encasement of the middle cerebral artery was demonstrated in one patient. Tumour vessels were seen in 2 of 8 cases before and 3 of 8 after gadolinium; Tumour hypervascularity was seen only after gadolinium, in 3 of 8 cases. Study of the veins was possible only on gadolinium-enhanced MRA. Displacement of the venous angle was seen in 4 of 7 patients in the frontal, and in all of 8 patients on the lateral projections. Early venous drainage was not seen. Patency of the dural venous sinuses was demonstrated in all patients, but in one neoplastic occlusion of a cortical vein was recognised.

Key words

Cerebral blood vessels, MR Magnetic resonance, vascular studies Magnetic resonance, contrast enhancement Brain, neoplasm, MR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson CM, Saloner D, Lee RE, Griswold VJ, Shapeero LG, Rapp JH, Nagarkar S, Pan X, Gooding GAW (1992) Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography: comparison with X-ray angiography and color Doppler ultrasound. AJNR 13: 989–1003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kido DK, Barsotti JB, Rice LZ, Rothenberg BM, Panzer RJ, Souza P, Dumoulin CL (1991) Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography. Neuroradiology 33: 48–51Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litt AW, Eidelman EM, Pinto RS, Riles TS, McLachlan SJ, Schwartzenberg S, Weinreb JC, Kricheff II (1991) Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR 12: 149–154Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Rugieri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR (1990) Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJNR 11: 449–456Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sevick RJ, Tsuruda JS, Schmalbrock P (1990) Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14: 874–881Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle HP et al (1989) Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography. Radiology 173: 831–837Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeMarco JK, Dillon WP, Halbach VV, Tsuruda JS (1990) Dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 175: 193–199Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L et al (1990) Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 175: 443–448Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nüssel F, Wegmuller H, Huber P (1991) Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 33: 56Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamada I, Matsushima Y, Suzuki S (1992) Moya moya disease: diagnosis with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 184: 773–778Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Keller PJ, Fram EK (1992) Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 185: 667–673Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chakeres DW, Schmalbrock P, Brogan M, Yuan C, Cohen L (1990) Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentetate dimeglumine in enhanced 3-D MR angiography. AJNR 11: 1107–1118Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nadel L, Braun IF, Kraft KA, Jensen ME, Laine FJ (1990) MRI of intracranial sinovenous thrombosis: the role of phase imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 8: 315–320Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsuruda JS, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ, Saloner D (1991) Dural sinus occlusion: evaluation with phase-sensitive gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR 12: 481–488Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blatter DD, Parker DL, Ahn SS, Bahr AL, Robison RO, Schwartz RB, Jolesz FA, Boyer RS (1992) Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Part II: Early clinical experience. Radiology 183: 379–389Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blatter DD, Parker DL, Robison RO (1991) Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Part I: Quantitative analysis of vessel visibility. Radiology 179: 805–811Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis WL, Warnock SH, Harnsberger HR, Parker DL, Chen CX (1993) Intracranial MRA: single volume vs multiple thin slab 3D time-of-flight acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17: 15–21Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edelman RR, Ahn SS, Chien D, Li W, Goldmann, A, Manfeld M, Kramer J, Kleefield J (1992) Improved time of flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 184: 395Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin W, Tkach JA, Haacke EM, Masaryk TJ (1993) Intracranial MR angiography of magnetization transfer contrast and fat saturation to short gradient echo, velocity-compensated sequences. Radiology 186: 753–761Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laub G, Purdy DE (1992) Variable-tipangle slab selection for improved three dimensional MR angiography. In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medecine. Berkeley, California, p 167Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tkach JA, Masaryk TJ, Ruggieri PM, Ross JS et al (1992) The use of tilted optimized nonsaturating excitation (TONE) RF pulses and MTC to improve the quality of MR angiograms of the carotid bifurcation. 11th Annual Scientic Meeting of the SMRM. Berlin, p 3905Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pernicorne JR, Thorp KE, Ouimette MV, Siebert JE, Potchen EJ (1992) Magnetic resonance angiography in intracranial vascular disease. Semin in Ultrasound, CT MRI 13: 256–273Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marchal G, Michiels J, Bosmans H, Van Hecke P (1992) Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain. Technique and first clinical results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 25–29Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haacke EM, Lindskog ED, Lin W (1991) A fast, iterative, partial-Fourier technique capable of local phase recovery. J Magn Reson 92: 126–145Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Wilms
    • 1
  • H. Bosmans
    • 1
  • G. Marchal
    • 1
  • P. Demaerel
    • 1
  • J. Goffin
    • 2
  • C. Plets
    • 2
  • A. L. Baert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospitals K. U. LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospitals K. U. LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations