Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 341, Issue 2, pp 155–170 | Cite as

Changes in muscle spindle activity of the chronically de-efferented gastrocnemius of the rat

  • Pavel Hník
  • Mary Jane lessler
Article

Summary

The response to stretch of chronically de-efferented muscle spindles was studied in the rat gastrocnemius muscle 6 days (short-term) and 48 days (long-term) after ventral rhizotomy respectively. Chronic de-efferentation enhances both the dynamic and static component of the response. There was no difference between the short-term and long-term de-efferentation, i.e. the response to stretch was as high several days after de-efferentation as after 1–2 months, when the muscle had undergone considerable atrophy. The response of both spindle primaries and secondaries was enhanced, but more so in the latter group. This suggests that the probable site of these changes after ventral root section lies in the polar regions. Early adaptation of de-efferented group I endings remained unaltered throughout the whole experimental period. Group II and III afferents, on the other hand, exhibited less adaptation than those from control muscles. Fibrillation activity of intrafusal muscle fibres does not seem to be involved, since quinidine sulphate in doses suppressing fibrillations in extrafusal muscle fibres does not eliminate the enhanced response. Ultrastructural changes at the site of sensory nerve terminals on the receptor cells of the spindle caused by chronic de-efferentation are probably responsible.

Key words

Muscle Spindle Activity Chronic De-efferentation Response to Muscle Stretch Muscle Atrophy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrew, B. L., Leslie, G. C., Thompson, J.: Characteristics of secondary endings in muscle spindles in caudal segmental muscles of the rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.)206, 31–32P (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arutyunyan, R. S.: Vliyanie atsetilkholina na normalnye i denervirovannye myshechnye retseptory. Byull. eksp. Biol. Med.12, 14–17 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barker, D., Ip, M. C., Adal, M. N.: A correlation between the receptor population of the cat's soleus muscle and the afferent fibre-diameter spectrum of the nerve supplying it. In: Symposium on Muscle Receptors, pp. 257–261 (D. Barker, ed.). Hongkong: Hongkong University Press 1962.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batten, F. E.: The muscle-spindle under pathological conditions. Brain20, 138–179 (1897).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bessou, P., Laporte, Y.: Activation des fibres afférentes myélinisées de petit calibre, d'origine musculaire (fibres du groupe III). C.R. Soc. Biol. (Paris)154, 1093–1096 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyd, I. A.: The structure and innervation of the nuclear bag muscle fibre system and the nuclear chain muscle fibre system in mammalian muscle spindles. Phil. Trans. B245, 81–136 (1962).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eldred, E., Granit, R., Merton, P. A.: Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J. Physiol. (Lond.)122, 498–523 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer, E., Ramsey, V. W.: Changes in protein content and in some physicochemical properties of the protein during muscular atrophies of various types. Amer. J. Physiol.145, 571–582 (1946).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukami, Y., Ridge, R. M. A. P.: The effect of chronic denervation on spindle discharge patterns and morphology in isolated costocutaneous muscles of garter snakes. J. comp. Neurol.143, 137–156 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granit, R., Homma, S.: The discharge to maintained stretch of spindles in slow and fast muscles of rabbit. Acta physiol. scand.46, 165–173 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granit, R., Ström, G.: Stretch reflexes before and after de-efferentation. Acta physiol. scand.27, 255–264 (1952).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gutmann, E.: The Denervated Muscle. Prague: Academia 1962.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harvey, R. J., Matthews, P. B. C.: The response of de-efferented muscle spindle endings in the cat's soleus to slow extension of the muscle. J. Physiol. (Lond.)157, 370–392 (1961).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hines, M., Knowlton, G. C.: Relation of recovery of strength of skeletal muscle to the regeneration of its cellular elements. J. comp. Neurol.103, 33–82 (1955).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hník, P.: Motor function disturbances and excitability changes following de-afferentation. Physiol. bohemoslov.5, 305–315 (1956).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hník, P.: Rate of denervation muscle atrophy. In: The Denervated Muscle, pp. 341–375 (E. Gutmann, ed). Prague: Academia 1962.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hník, P.: Increased sensory outflow from de-efferented muscles. Physiol. bohemoslov.13, 405–410 (1964).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hník, P.: The increased response of chronically de-efferented rat muscle spindles to stretch. Brain Res.21, 448–451 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hník, P., Beránek, R., Vyklický, L., Zelená, J.: Sensory outflow from chronically tenotomized muscles. Physiol. bohemoslov.12, 23–29 (1963).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hník, P., Hudlická, O., Kučera, J., Payne, R.: Activation of muscle afferents by nonproprioceptive stimuli. Amer. J. Physiol.217, 1451–1457 (1969).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hník, P., Kučera, J., Kidd, G. L.: Muscle sensory outflow following stimulation of alpha motor nerve fibres. Physiol. bohemoslov.19, 49–54 (1970).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hník, P., Lessler, M. J.: The enhanced spindle response to stretch of tenotomized gastrocnemius muscle of the rat. Brain Res.33, 237–240 (1971).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hník, P., Payne, R.: The origin of increased sensory outflow from chronically de-efferented muscles. Physiol. bohemoslov.15, 498–507 (1966).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horsley, V.: Short note on sense organs in muscle and on the preservation of muscle spindles in conditions of extreme muscular atrophy, following section of the motor nerve. Brain20, 375–376 (1897).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hunt, C. C.: Relation of function to diameter in afferent fibres of muscle nerves. J. gen. Physiol.38, 117–131 (1954).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hunt, C. C., Kuffler, S. W.: Further study of efferent small-nerve fibres to mammalian muscle spindles. Multiple spindle innervation and activity during contraction. J. Physiol. (Lond.)113, 283–297 (1951).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Husmark, I., Ottoson, D.: Is the adaptation of the muscle spindle of ionic origin? Acta physiol. scand.81, 138–140 (1971a).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Husmark, I., Ottoson, D.: The contribution of mechanical factors to the early adaptation of the spindle response. J. Physiol. (Lond.)212, 577–592 (1971b).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katz, B.: Depolarization of sensory terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle. J. Physiol. (Lond.)111, 261–282 (1950).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kay, R. H.: A reciprocal time-interval display using transistor circuits. Electronic Engng.37, 543–545 (1965).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kolínská, J.: Somatic innervation and its effect upon muscle collagen (in Czech). Čs. Fysiol.7, 223–224 (1958).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kozak, W., Westerman, R. A.: Plastic changes of spinal monosynaptic responses from tenotomized muscles in cats. Nature (Lond.)189, 753–755 (1961).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuffler, S. W., Hunt, C. C., Quilliam, J. P.: Function of medullated small-nerve fibres in mammalian ventral roots: Efferent muscle spindle innervation. J. Neurophysiol.14, 29–54 (1951).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lapresle, J., Milhaud, M.: Pathologie du fuseau neuromusculaire. Rev. neurol.110, 97–122 (1964).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leksell, L.: The action potential and excitatory effects of the small ventral root fibres to skeletal muscle. Acta physiol. scand.10, (Suppl. 31) 1–84 (1945).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lloyd, D. P. C., Chang, H.-T.: Afferent fibres in muscle nerves. J. Neurophysiol.11, 199–207 (1948).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Matthews, P. B. C.: Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions. London: Arnold 1972.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matthews, P. B. C., Rushworth, G.: The discharge from muscle spindles as an indicator of efferent paralysis by procaine. J. Physiol. (Lond.)140, 421–426 (1958).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maynard, J. A., Tipton, C. M.: The effects of exercise training and denervation on the morphology of intrafusal muscle fibres. Int. Z. angew. Physiol.30, 1–9 (1971).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ottoson, D., Shepherd, G. M.: Changes of length within the frog muscle spindle during stretch as shown by stroboscopic photomicroscopy. Nature (Lond.)220, 912–914 (1968).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ottoson, D., Shepherd, G. M.: Length changes within isolated frog muscle spindle during and after stretching. J. Physiol. (Lond.)207, 747–759 (1970).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paintal, A. S.: Functional analysis of group III afferent fibres of mammalian muscles. J. Physiol. (Lond.)152, 250–270 (1960).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sherrington, C. S.: On the anatomical constitution of nerves of skeletal muscles; with remarks on recurrent fibres in the ventral spinal nerve-root. J. Physiol. (Lond.)17, 211–258 (1894).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Solandt, D. Y., Magladery, J. W.: The relation of atrophy to fibrillation in denervated muscle. Brain63, 255–262 (1940).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stacey, M. J.: Free nerve endings in skeletal muscle of the cat. J. Anat. (Lond.)105, 231–254 (1969).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Teorell, T.: A biophysical analysis of mechano-electrical transduction. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 1, Principles of Receptor Physiology, pp. 291–339 (W. R. Loewenstein, ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thomson, J. D.: Mechanical characteristics of skeletal muscle undergoing atrophy of denervation. Amer. J. Phys. Med.34, 606–611 (1955).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tower, S. S.: Atrophy and degeneration in the muscle spindle. Brain55, 77–90 (1932).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weiss, P., Edds, M. V., Jr.: Spontaneous recovery of muscle following partial denervation. Amer. J. Physiol.145, 589–607 (1946).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zelená, J., Hník, P.: Motor and receptor units in the soleus muscle after nerve regeneration in very young rats. Physiol. bohemoslov.12, 277–290 (1963).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zimmerman, G. W., Grossie, J.: Sensitivity and behavior of muscle spindles to systemic arterial hypoxia. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)132, 1114–1118 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Hník
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mary Jane lessler
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Utah, Medical CenterSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options