Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 427, Issue 1–2, pp 64–70 | Cite as

Some properties of the UL-FS 49 block of the hyperpolarization-activated current (if) in sino-atrial node myocytes

  • Dario DiFrancesco
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

Block of the hyperpolarization-activated “pacemaker” current (if) by the bradycardic agent UL-FS 49 was studied in isolated sino-atrial (SA) node myocytes. Using repetitive activation/deactivation protocols, micromolar concentrations of UL-FS 49 blockedif in a dose-dependent fashion. Block development was slow, with time constants decreasing with drug concentration and ranging from 25.8 s at 10 μM to 75.5 s at 1 μM UL-FS 49. Block did not develop in cells held at −35 mV, at which voltageif channels are closed, indicating that channels must open before blocking occurs. Apparently in contrast with the requirement of negative voltages for block development, block was relieved by hyperpolarization with a time course slower than current kinetics. Due to the hyperpolarization-induced block relief, current/voltage (I/V) relations in the presence of UL-FS 49 displayed inward-going rectification. Experimental data fitted the hypothesis that UL-FS 49 behaves as an “open channel” blocker of “single-ion”if channels. Block occurs within the pore, at a distance of about 39% of the membrane thickness from its internal side.

Key words

Pacemaker current (ifBlock UL-FS 49 Sino-atrial node Bradycardic agents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong CM (1966) Time-course of TEA-induced anomalous rectification in squid giant axons. J Gen Physiol 50:491–503Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong CM, Hille B (1972) The inner quaternary ammonium ion receptor in potassium channels of the node of Ranvier. J Gen Physiol 59:388–400Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen CJ, McCarthy RT (1987) Nimodipine block of calcium channels in rat anterior pituitary cells. J Physiol (Lond) 387:195–225Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Courtney KR (1975) Mechanism of frequency-dependent inhibition of sodium currents in frog myelinated nerve by the lidocaine derivative GEA 968. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 195:225–236Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiFrancesco D (1981) A study of the ionic nature of the pacemaker current in calf Purkinje fibres. J Physiol (Lond) 314:377–393Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiFrancesco D (1982) Block and activation of the pacemaker channel in calf Purkinje fibres: effects of potassium, caesium and rubidium. J Physiol (Lond) 329:485–507Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DiFrancesco D (1993) Pacemaker mechanisms in cardiac tissue. Annu Rev Physiol 55:451–467Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DiFrancesco D, Tromba C (1988) Inhibition of the hyperpolarizing-activated current,i f, induced by acetylcholine in rabbit sino-atrial node myocytes. J Physiol (Lond) 405:477–491Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DiFrancesco D, Ferroni A, Mazzanti M, Tromba C (1986) Properties of the hyperpolarizing-activated current (i f) in cells isolated from the rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol (Lond) 377:61–88Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frace AM, Maruoka F, Noma A (1992) External K+ increases Na+ conductance of the hyperpolarization-activated current in rabbit cardiac pacemaker cells. Pflügers Arch 421:97–99Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagiwara S, Myiazaki S, Rosenthal NP (1976) Potassium current and the effect of cesium on this current during anomalous rectification of the egg cell membrane of a starfish. J Gen Physiol 67:621–638Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hille B (1992) Ionic channels of excitable membranes, chap. 15. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hille B, Schwarz W (1978) Potassium-channels as multi-ion single-file pores. J Gen Physiol 72:409–442Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hille B, Woodhull AM, Shapiro BI (1975) Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nerve: divalent ions, monovalent ions and pH. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 270:301–318Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hondeghem LM, Katzung BG (1984) Antiarrhythmic agents: the modulated receptor mechanism of action of sodium and calcium channel-blocking drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 24:387–423Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobinger W, Lillie C (1984) Alinidine. New Drugs Annu Cardiovasc Drugs 2:193–210Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lillie C, Kobinger W (1987) Investigations differentiating the mechanism of specific bradycardic agents from that of calcium channel blockers. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 335:331–333Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snyders DJ, Van Bogaert P (1987) Alinidine modifies the pacemaker current in sheep Purkinje fibres. Pflügers Arch 658:1–9Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strichartz GR (1973) The inhibition of sodium currents in myelinated nerve by quaternary derivative of lidocaine. J Gen Physiol 62:37–57Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Bogaert P, Goethals M (1987) Pharmacological influence of specific bradycardic agents on the pacemaker current of sheep cardiac Purkinje fibres. A comparison between three different molecules. Eur Heart J 8 [Suppl L]:35–42Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Bogaert P, Goethals M, Simoens C (1990) Use- and frequency-dependent blockade by UL-FS 49 of thei f pacemaker current in sheep Purkinje fibres. Eur J Pharmacol 187:241–256Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woodhull AM (1973) Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve. J Gen Physiol 61:687–708Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yeh JZ, TenEick RE (1987) Molecular and structural basis of resting and use-dependent block of sodium current defined using disopyramide analogues. Biophys J 51:123–135Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yellen G (1984) Relief of Na+ block of Ca2+-activated K+ channels by external cations. J Gen Physiol 84:187–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dario DiFrancesco
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica Generali, ElettrofisiologiaUniversità di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations